| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site is very cheap since it costs less than $5 a month, so the ratio of price to the amount of content is definitely in your favor
-You get about 100 galleries of the twenty or so feature models from the site with about half belonging to the star of the site, Rawcklin
-The videos number around 65 and each clip runs anywhere from one to five minutes long
-There are additional galleries of "guest models" with their own sites, so the site is a good resource for additional BBW content |
| Cons: |
-It's pretty clear that very little has been updated at this site in quite a long time since the most recent pictures and videos are from 2005
-The number of pictures per gallery is highly variable and there aren't any zip options for easy downloading, so you'd have to save them one at a time
-The video quality is average at best with many being very poor and others not playing at all
-There are numerous references to new content and contests coming soon in 2006, when it's already 2007 |
| Bottom Line: |
I've had my eye on this site for a long time, but the low price (under $5 a month) always left me suspicious. I mean, what could there possibly be in terms of quality content for so little money? However, I finally decided to give it a try, mostly because there wasn't much to lose.
The focus of the site is women with VERY large asses and features about 20 different girls, though only about 7 of those have more than a couple galleries and/or videos. In fact, one model, Rawcklin, has 52 galleries while the next highest had just 13. The distribution of videos is about the same with 65 clips of anywhere from 1 to 5 minutes each.
The five pages of galleries add up to around a hundred overall and while the picture quality is decent, the number of shots per gallery varies quite a bit. The most recent page doesn't have dates, but most others do and run from '03 to '05, which indicated to me that there was very little recent activity. Nearly all of the pictures and videos are close ups of the girl's ass which I like as much as the next guy, but I found it a bit repetitive after awhile and I was looking for more variety.
In the final analysis, this is a site with plenty of vids and pics, but without any updates for a year or so there's not much reason to stay a member for more than a month. I can honestly say the amount of content is worth the price if you like this sort of thing, but that's only because it's so cheap. Otherwise, I'm sure you can find better content elsewhere. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|