Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Busty Brits

Visit Site

Busty Brits

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Big Boobs
2. European Girls

Busty Brits
1 Site Listed
Partner: Busty Brits Cash

Monthly: $19.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $24.99 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.99 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all Busty Brits Site Facts at TBP.

65.0
Feedback History  (4)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

83.5
TBP Review

Date: 09-12-13

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Exclusive British collection.
+  HD videos.
-  Older scenes aren't HD.
-  Not enough browse tools.

User Reviews (1)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
65
RagingBuddhist (65) 10-07-14  08:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (63), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 130 models
+ Excellent download speeds - average 3.5+ mb/s without a download manager
+ Lower than usual cost to join
+ Streaming previews for video
+ Zip files for newer picture sets
Cons: - 1990s layout
- split updates
- No search engine
- Some video quality really poor
- Lackluster and repetitive picture sets
- No set update schedule
- Only one file type for video - wmv
- Links that open to no content
Bottom Line: I know this site's been around for years so I knew I'd be looking at a lot of old video and pictures. The earliest content appears to date back to 2003 and I can't say I remember some of the video and picture quality being that bad back then. The newest video is a typical 1280 x 720 @ 4000+ kbps, well-lit, and look pretty good. But the older stuff is 640 x 480 @ 700+ kbps - those specs are somewhat deceiving because a lot of the old files are dim and blurry. Picture quality? The biggest are 1500 pixels on the long side. Meh. Going back in time gives you a not unexpected drop in size. And I've never been a fan of picture sets that contain portions that look like they were shot with a rapid fire shutter. Six, seven or more shots of a crotch that look like the model moved maybe an inch? WHY?

"What? No search function?"
"Split updates in this day and age?"
I think I actually said that out loud to myself when I first started running through the site. No excuse for that in 2014. There's also no excuse for links that open to blank and/or incomplete picture sets. I hit at least a dozen.

The content here really didn't do much for me. Some of the women are only busty because they're seriously overweight, some aren't all that well endowed and some (only a few that I saw) are siliconed. When I first joined, I jumped around the site a bit, ignoring the 1990 look to it, and downloaded maybe two dozen videos and a few dozen pictures, then I all but forgot about it until I got the email today that said my subscription was ending. Anyway, I went back, hit all the models' thumbs to see what else I might want and ended up with just under 100 videos and a few hundreds pics. Unfortunately, I can see me deleting a lot of files later as I really check 'em out. I also see that I'm going to have to break out the video editor to try to fix some color and lighting issues, even on some of the newer video.

I'm giving this site a 65 only because they're mostly true to their niche and because it's relatively cheap to join. All in all I see it as just another site that's probably best left as a one-time join for lovers o' the bigguns.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Capn (28) 07-01-11  05:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

TBP Review.

I am very surprised the recent TBP review made no mention of the fact that updates on this site are still split.

Not only that, but what is worse, the parts are not posted consecutively.

IMO that would take at least 10 off the score.

Cap'n. :0/

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Capn (28) 02-20-10  11:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Any Opinion on this Site?

I am considering giving this one a whirl.

Are there any folk who are / were a member who would like to give any info or advice on it?

Cap'n. :0/

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Busty Brits

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Busty Brits (1) 65.0 83.5

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.39 seconds.