| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Loads of pee here
-Decent amount of content
-Videos reasonable quality
-No DRM
-Some very good looking girls
-Most file names include model
-Access to network
-Many download and stream file type options
-Do not have to log in frequently |
| Cons: |
-Sites is pretty expensive at $35 for a month
-Older videos are not named well, newer ones are ok
-Older stuff is low resolution, to be expected though
-Must download videos in clips, usually 10 minutes each. No option for a single larger file.
-Videos can be very repetitive
-Many scenes have a handle full of guys but no intercourse
-Videos open a new page, even for downloading
-Navigation takes a minute to get used to |
| Bottom Line: |
Better bring a very large towel with you here! The site is about pee and they do not mess around, there is a lot of it.
The average scene is a girl peeing in a bowl then dumping on herself. Then a bunch of guys come in a pee all over her. After than they all jerk of and she blows them until they cum all over her.
It is all pretty random here. The only scripted parts are when they should pee, or get head and such. There is no organization for anything else. The site definitely has an amateur feel to it. The content itself and the presentation seems amateur. The camera bounces around a lot.
This is one of the larger sites on the network in actual size to download anyway. The site is 35.3 GB and has 239 video clips and has about 50 scenes. Each scene has four or so clips to it.
The quality of the videos is not bad. The average clip is about 150 MB or so and 7 to 10 minutes long. The bit rate goes up to 2300 KBit and at full scene look about like VHS. The videos are mostly 640 x 480. The older ones are half that.
The photos here are nothing special and are basically screen caps anyway. It is all about the videos.
In many of the scenes some of the pee can be pretty yellow. This may of may not bother you, but I prefer it to be clear. I also prefer lesbian pee scenes over scenes with guys. For me it is about where it comes from rather than what it is. There is some solo and lesbian peeing but it is vastly guy peeing on girl.
The sites gives access to a network of other sites, many of which feature peeing and fisting. If are into pee at all than this site should be worth considering because of the network access. You are bound to find a few scenes that do the trick for you. This is the only site here that features a group of guys peeing on one or two girls, many other sites have just one or two guys.
If you have a things for golden showers than the price would be worth it to you. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Normal looking men with emphasis on the girl.
Female narrating in background enjoys herself.
Decent looking females.
The best looking female an Indian was a complete dipshit and should have been slapped as well.
Part of a package, so enough for a month.
Quality of video fine. |
| Cons: |
My first experience with gs on a web site. Would much prefer 5:1 female to male instead of the opposite. If you have seen one you have seen them all. No variety in script, shot or positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mediocre. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Bukkake Pee!
Add Comment
|
RSS Feeds : All Bukkake Pee Activity - Bukkake Pee Reviews - Bukkake Pee Comments - Bukkake Pee News
