Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Steady flow of updates.
-Sexy sets.
-Some models are to die for.
-Original Ideas.
Cons:
- Sets are only displayed 20 pics at a time.
- Non nude sets might disappoint some subscribers
- Could clean up the how viewing content works.
- Large pixel pictures are a bit fuzzy
Bottom Line:
I did not really want to write a review on Breath Takers because what has been said in the reviews below pretty much summed it all up, and i would only be repeating what other have reviewed. But i decided it is more then a half decent site and it deserves a review and rating.
This site was refereed to me from a friend with more then creditability in taste when it comes to erotica, So i got a month subscription. It did not disappointment all. The models are next to the best i have seen, actually only one other site i know of that it could push in for fist place.
The photography in this site is outstanding, I'm very impressed with the shots. With the mix of Drop dead gorgeous models and the shooting style it made for a very seductive atmosphere that lets you almost feel present at the set. I found myself thinking what a beautiful picture, and not just because of the naked model on it.
There are some issues though, I couldn't handle 20 pictures at a time. I need way more on the page that i can scroll down to. Also clicking on an enlarged picture opens up a different window, so you have to go back to the original window which makes it a pain to see other sets from the model. fixing that mess would do wonders for the navigation for the site.
Some times it was hurtful to not see a model naked or even half undressed. Such beautiful models and not even a tease in some sets. Makes a guy kinda sad. We need something !
Although breath takers isn't my favorite site, it does have the hottest set i have seen since i have been in the scene. I also found myself zipping a good half of the models there for my personal collection too.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (7)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Just saw Spencer's new review of this site and it's a shame it seems to have stopped updating - it's one of my favourite sites in terms of material. It's rarely much, if any, more explicit that Met Art but somehow it puts more atmosphere and context into the photos, and makes them more appealing/arousing.
Interestingly, a quick look at Girlfolio, which has a large overlap with this site - the same photographer and locations, and many of the same models, shows it is still updating. That bumps it up my list a bit...
I really wanted to like this site.
Great models, shot in a borderline artsy style.
Lack of zip size choice, colour casts on many sets.
Flaky page loading.
Sets lacking progression, starting out part way through & or concluding prior to full nudity.
Some sets feature some lingerie, so may be a better fit for my friend M, than myself.
A shame....Fairly close, but no cigar for this one.
SASHA / CRYSTAL BLUE
Here's a new set with Sasha that we did back in the past and kept secret...til now. This is the first one of a new spicyer style
That we have decided to add on BT.
Stay tuned...there's a second part coming very soon !
---
Just found that note in the preview area of BT guess I'll give that site a try now :-) oh, an b.t.w. the set has been released last month so there might be a chance of getting more intimate stuff in the near future.
I joined this site to take advantage of this month's reduced pricing - I'll review when I get a chance, but meantime, if anyone else is tempted, I'll point out:
* The content is soft, but perhaps a little less so than when anyonebutme reviewed it, and there are a number of videos with masturbation;
* Cap'n, full strips seem to be one of the main ideas here - a rough look shows 4/10 sets in April, and 7/13 sets in March, show models starting fully clothed and ending fully naked (although some still with shoes). FYI! :)
Drawn particularly to Amandine and Crystal Klein, I was a member in November. Will definitely not return.
Most of the photo sets were repetitious pics of women rarely getting completely undressed, usually in light that's way too low for my taste. And there were way too many "JC Penny poses," jd1961's term for models looking away from the camera, or just having their backs to the camera, and standing around like real, flesh-and-blood mannequins.
The photography is "professional," but that doesn't mean you're going to like it any more than you'll like the work of certain professional musicians, composers, or architects.
To be fair, I suppose this kind of stuff is in a niche that would appeal to someone. I'd call it "Extreme Softcore." But if you want nudity, or ample light, or models that often look at the camera, forget it!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
