Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Brazilian Facials

Visit Site

Brazilian Facials

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Cum Shots
2. Blowjobs
3. Porn Videos

Falcao Media
4 Sites Listed
Partner: Brazil Syndicate

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $84.95 (3 months, non-recurring)

View all Brazilian Facials Site Facts at TBP.

N/A
Feedback History  (13)

Active Reviews 0
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 4
Review by TheBestPorn:

76.0
TBP Review

Date: 12-22-09

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Exclusive scenes with huge loads.
+  Great-sized collection.
-  Infrequent updates.
-  Video quality could be better.

User Reviews (9)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
50*
hopslam (0) 07-24-13  06:14pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True amateur Brazilian girls
Huge facials
Cons: Hardly any content (they pulled it all and are recycling 30 or so at a time now)
Bottom Line: I just signed up for this board to warn anybody who is considering joining this site that they pulled all their content. One of the major plusses of this site was the amount of content (close to 300 videos). Now they only have 35.

In my opinion 35 measly low quality videos for 30 dollars a month is a rip off.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
85*
ElPorno (0) 01-09-13  11:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great site mainly because of its large collection of content. The fact that these are average girls doing hardcore sex acts makes it all that much special.
Cons: The biggest downer in the site is the incredibly slow download speed. It would at least helped if it had download resume but not even that it has. Hell it doesn't even need to place a daily download limit.
Bottom Line: Lots and lots of content makes this site that worthy of a look. However be warned that the slow download speed will result in less of a chance of watching much scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
70
mbaya (356) 05-13-09  05:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
93
pr0n addict (9) 07-14-08  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90*
lips71 (0) 05-10-08  09:49pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
95
guvner (8) 03-16-08  06:18am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
85
Toadsith (48) 02-02-08  07:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
95
uscue (39) 03-01-07  01:50pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
91
bjorn7 (19) 01-22-07  10:40am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (4)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

uscue (39) 07-20-10  08:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)

Complete Site Redesign

Well I guess they are still active. The site has undergone a completely new redesign. They now use a flowplayer for their streaming videos as well. The new design takes away the date of updates, so now you don't know when a scene was actually updated, but it does seem like the are back to updating regularly. A quick view of the "updates" page shows a count of 253 videos currently on this site alone, and you get four total sites on the network. Not sure how many videos are on the other network sites.

I may end up joining again. Only thing I don't really like with the new design is they changed the way they name their scenes. It used to be named by the girls name followed by a number, making it easy to just tack on the next number (emyly1, emyly2, etc) and find her next scene. Now the scenes are labeled by update number (240, 001, 180, etc), so it's harder to pull up additional scenes by a girl (they typically are able to get some girls to come back for 2 or 3 shoots ... they are obviously scenes shot with a wide range of time between them because most girls have completely different looks and/or bodies by the time they shoot another scene).

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

uscue (39) 07-14-09  07:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)

Recycling Updates

As of a few months ago they've started using the first batch of videos as their udpates for the week, so I think that means they've run out of material and stopped filming new material. That still shouldn't hinder anyone new that hasn't joined though because there are literally gigs and gigs and gigs of content that will take a long time to get all of it.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

uscue (39) 06-01-07  09:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)

More Sites now included

Brazilian Facials has now added two affiliate sites to their membership: Real Sex Rio and Candid Rio. Although I have yet to view the content of these sites, it looks like more of the stuff you love from the main site as I see mostly the same girls but in completely new scenes. This is great for those that love the site because it is a truly amateur site (no porn stars) so these new additions give you a chance to see some of your favorite girls again in new videos.

In all, that makes the 24.95 price tag better with three sites now instead of just one.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Woodruff (37) 01-26-07  09:51pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)

Good although ugly girls

This is a decent facial site - good design, massive loads, etc. My big problem with it is that the girls are not very good looking. I think what's hot about facials usually is the juxtaposition of a hot girl with the nastiness of a bunch of cum on her face. Watching an ugly girl get plastered - it's just unpleasant.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Brazilian Facials

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Candid Rio (0) N/A 76.5
2. Brazilian Facials (0) N/A 76.0
3. Backdoor Brazil (0) N/A 75.0
4. Real Sex Rio (0) N/A N/A

View All: Company Sites (4)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.42 seconds.