| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly attractive mature women.
Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.
Videos can be streamed.
Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.
Updates are regular. |
| Cons: |
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.
Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.
If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.
Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message. |
| Bottom Line: |
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.
I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.
The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.
In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.
In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.
Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.
One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.
Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)
General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.
Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”
As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
