| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Download managers supported.
-The most recent videos can be downloaded WMV 640x360, 2000 kbps or MP4 640x360.
-Videos can streamed or downloaded, in parts or as a whole video.
-No DRM or download restrictions. I did get the message a few times that I was exceeding their bandwidth restrictions while downloading.
-Nice mix of masturbation, softcore and hardcore videos. Most picture sets were not hardcore.
-Photos can be zipdownloaded.
-Photos are 1600x1063. |
| Cons: |
-No access to other websites in the network. Discounts available for multiple signups though.
-Full archive available only by scrolling through the list of models. The video and picture sections were dreadfully incomplete. The archives contain nothing before October 2007, although the site started in December 2005.
-I suspect that some of the material is no longer on the site. I counted 85 models, 70 videos, and 147 photo sets. Compare this to the TBP facts update as of 8/24/8 which has 73 videos and 263 picture sets. I see that new material has been added, yet the site is smaller. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site specializes in big asses and generally has larger women as a result. As such it can be compared to other sites such as XLGirls and Roundandbrown. I found the videos generally more interesting here than on either of these sites. The others focus more exclusively on body parts such as breasts in XLgirls and ass in roundandbrown. This site is more whole girl with an emphasis on the part as a secondary matter. I prefer whole girl to parts. XLgirls is mostly white girls. In contrast, roundandbrown and this site have mostly black and latina girls. More than half are black, probably two thirds. What I also preferred here was that there is some anal, which was sadly lacking in roundandbrown. Overall I liked the sex, but it was not greatly different from what you could find on a site featuring ordinary gonzo style porn. There were many well known pornstars, but some of the models were strippers and not the most common names and faces you could find anywhere. I did not appreciate the lack of any easy way to find the content or the fact that apparently some of the material is no longer on the site. Good value for a discounted site, but I would feel disappointed at full price. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great video quality, vids can be downloaded in full scenes or clips.
- Solid amount of Content, some 80 plus vids and hundreds of picture galleries.
- 100% Exclusive content
- Nice variation of solo and hardcore scenes with some anal mixed in.
- Very good pic quality, sets of about 60 pics each, zip files can be downloaded in 800X1600 and 1600X1200 sizes.
- Frequent updates.
- Easy browsing options which have improved since I first joined. |
| Cons: |
- Focus on ass alone is a bit obsessive
- The price, at 29.99, is a bit steep for a site offering no network access. There is at least one way around it however, I joined Legsex at 29.99 and got this site included for 16.99 a month (of course I know not everyone will be interested in Legsex).
- Although there are plenty of pics, it could offer more for a magazine affiliated site.
- Noticed a few dead link picture galleries, these were rare however.
- Plenty here, but still needs growth |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site is strong on the fundamentals of pic/vid quality and options. I've been a member of this site for a while now simply due to the fact that for this particular niche there really isn't any better out there. The price is quite high considering there is no network access here; so if you only OCCASIONALLY like to see ebony and Latino gals I would probably suggest other sites like the Bangbros Ballhoneys, or RoundandBrown from Reality Kings. However, the afformentioned sites really have nothing on Bootylicios Mag in terms of both quality, and even potential(as it's still a fairly new site); so if REALLY you need your fill of these ladies, this is the place.
That said, my only real gripe is that the obsessive focus on ass alone may limit the site somewhat. It's quite normal to see whole photo sets without even one full frontal shot of the girl photographed. The videos also follow a similar track, which can make them a bit one dimensional as well. Obviously the name of the site IS "Bootyliciousmag", but for those wanting to see ALL these gals have to offer this could be a turnoff. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Bootylicious Mag Activity - Bootylicious Mag Reviews - Bootylicious Mag Comments - Bootylicious Mag News
