| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Naturally-busty models, including some stunners
- Lots of content up
- Zipfiles for pics
- Zipped pics up to 1200x1800
- No navigation issues
- Good, clear video (640x480, 2000-3000 bitrate), though not HD
- Not heavy on toys or masturbation (con for most, probably) |
| Cons: |
- Pics in browser are smaller versions than the ones in the zipfiles
- Many vids in small chunks rather than single files
- Needs more variety of action in solo vids: too many long periods with model doing nothing but playing with her breasts.
- Someone has a tooth-brushing fetish, which is a tad strange. Many models shown brushing teeth. |
| Bottom Line: |
All in all, this is one of my favorite boob sites, and I've tried a great many of them. Most of the solo vids are silent, meaning no music and precious little blather. Some find this a con, but it's a major plus for me. I also have to say that this site features some of the sexiest women in this genre, like April O'Neil, Holly Webster, Petra, and the amazing Alina. Not to mention Arika, who might not have a beautiful face but is sheer perfection from the neck down.
There is not a great deal of HC here, but there is some. All I took was solo content. Still, I ended up with 27 gigs of video and 10 gigs of zipfiles. There is a good deal of variance in pic size, going from smallish to 1200x1800. Most of the sets I've extracted look very nice.
I would venture to say that most guys would find this site too tame, and maybe a tad silly. There is a monotony in what the models are actually doing in the vids: lots of tooth-brushing, showering, and continuous auto-booby-squeezing. For sites like this to be more interesting to the average perv as far as solo content, we need to think of getting the models to engage in a wider variety of activities. I love to watch beautiful women do mundane things so this actually isn't a huge problem for me.
I will probably join again in about six to nine months to get the updates. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Full access trial, 2 days
Many large breasted models
Updates daily!
Shows a picture from coming updates
Photos have Zips
decent picture size, zips only though
A good amount of content
Can search by model
Simple naviagtion |
| Cons: |
Very little har4dcore, no lesbian found
Photos are small in browser
Access to other sites is a joke, just junk streams
Some videos must be downloaded in chunks, up to 10
You only have one option for file type, wmv
Must relog in periodically, messes up downloaders |
| Bottom Line: |
All around I would say this is a good site. I will definitely be keeping this one on my periodic rejoin list. The girl look pretty good and they have awesome natural breasts.
The video quality here is not bad at 2040 KBit/s for all of the videos, even the first ones. There is currently 114 videos but they update daily. The videos are 640x480 or 720x480 and total for 22.2 GB. They could use a little work but look nice regardless.
The photo sets are strange in that if you just browse through them and look you will only see a low res picture. If you download the zip you get the high res pictures. The photos look very nice though and I always go for the zips anyway. The older ones are at 768x1024 and the newer photos are at 1200x1800 and really do look crisp.
Your log in will last a good part of the evening, but you cant just put the whole site in your download manager and let it rip...unless you got a hell of a connection! The speed of the site is good as well.
The only difference between here and DDFBusty for example is the age of the model and that there is very little hardcore. Well, there is a price difference too.
I would recommend this site to anyone who does not mind a lot of solo content or someone who is addicted to naturally large breasts on girls who do not look like they spent too much time at the all-you-can-eat buffet. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|