Although it's presented differently, MOST of the content in the members area for this site is the same as Twistys (90.0). We do allow reviews and comments for clones of all types, but we recommend reviewing the source site to keep them in one location.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (6)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Having rejuiced my Twisty's membership for a few days I thought I'd take a gander to see what's new at BlueFantasies. Guess what? Nothing. The last update was in October of 09. Don't know why this happened but it's too bad as it was a decent site.
For those of you thinking about joining Twisty's or here (still worth a cheap trial membership even though it's no longer updating) here's the run down on what you get:
Pics: About 780 galleries, almost all solo. Pic sizes are only 1200x860 with a few 1600x1070 tossed in. All sets have zip and the quality is very good. No size options to choose from.
Vids: About 435 with virtually all of them solo. All vids seem to be 640x480. Only DL options are wmv, QT and iphone. Again, the quality is very good.
You get the same search engine that they have at twistys when it comes to choosing your model or toy or body type your looking for which is useful. The tags are a bit generic though. The model directory is just OK when compared to Twistys because the data seems a lot less specific.
As I mentioned, if you like glamour and decent quality then this site isn't bad. I woulnd't fork out a monthly membership here, especially since they're no longer updating but if you hop on for on the 2 day full access trial specials available through TBP you might like the offerings.
As part of my "economic sustainability program," I've joined Twistys (which includes BlueFantasties) for an acceptable rate of $10 per month. I've been happy with the increased pic sizes to a standard 1600px.
But I'm dismayed by the increased size of the watermark in the most recent photoset of Vanessa Cooper, "Stair Way ..." That blasted watermark is certainly larger than in the previous sets. It gets right on her head or arms in several shots.
Vanessa is a hot babe and the photoset is pretty nice, but that watermark just RUINS the pics in which it intrudes on my viewing.
Why didn't they see the problem before posting this set? It's OBVIOUS. What, do they just run the watermark layer macro, zip, and post without checking the results?
I'm currently a member of this site by way of joining Twistys. TBP may want to consider reclassifying the site as there is nothing hardcore about it. There is no boy/girl and the few lesbian movies they have are definitely in the softcore realm.
I'm just curious here, the preview shows a whole page of models with the name that starts with A, a couple of rows with B, then jumps to J. Most of you probably know, I am looking to see if Eve Angel is on this site. It has several of my favorites that I do see, but I was just wondering if anyone that has been a member remembers if Eve is on it?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.