| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The most beautiful girls/women are gathered in this quite softcore site.
But not so softcore after all: Masturbation included for most models
Not crisp, but anyway good quality of videos - 640x480 wmv.
Ok price
Easy/good navigation |
| Cons: |
First of all: No zip - please change that!
Muzak-background for videos.
Not sure about updates |
| Bottom Line: |
First thanks to Drooler for getting my attention to this site.
I'm giving it a higher score than he is, here's my reasons:
1: Some great - and I repeat great - videos of Crissy Moran - I thought I've seen them all, but these are both sexy, cute and well performed by the faboulous woman. The muzak is not her fault.
2: There are generally some ekstremely fine women here doing videos at poolsites and typical other outdoor locations: Summer and sun and these girls getting rid of their bikinis is just great.
3: Not only Crissy Moran, but the US-answer to Eve Angel: Mindy Vega (no offense to the devoted Eve-fans here, but admid: there ARE SOME resemblance).
This site gives me a bit like when a kid eating different kinds of desert: Don't want to taste them all at once - or here the first day/week - saving some for a rainy day.
Well, yeah bottom line:
This is softcore with a special flavour that has no really resemblamce to sites like European Glamour Girls or 1ByDay/1ByNight - but has a thing of its own.
But get rid of that muzak-background, please...why can't we listen to Crissy moaning a bit? She moves her lips, but nothing comes out for the viewer. Guys at Bikini Riot: Please think about that. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Very hot & familiar women, usually posing by a pool, striping out of bikinis and getting into some nicely provocative poses
+Collection of 53 models with a total of 140 exclusive pic sets and approx. 15 non-exclusive sets (usually older stuff seen at MatrixNudes)
+95 videos of acceptable quality at 640x480 wmv; 480x360 wmv and iPod mp4 320x240 also available
+What’s New link gives all of the updates
+Attractive design and mostly easy navigation
+1200px images (the last two updates only) |
| Cons: |
-No zips
-Very slow w/updates: just 3 new pic sets and 3 new vids per month is typical
-Only most recent updates dated, on home page
-a few “Polaroid Scans” and BTS pics of lesser quality; those who run the site seem to think these are worth getting excited over
-Pic sizes vary: 42 sets top at 800 px, 96 at 1024, and to date, just two are at 1200px (I counted them pretty carefully)
-clicking on an update takes you to the model’s page, so you have to remember which one you clicked |
| Bottom Line: |
If you’ve got a thing for “American” girls, you may be especially pleased with the exclusive content here. The only girls here that I know of not from the U. S. of A are Jana Cova and Zdenka (Czech), Kellie Marie (Welsh), Monica Sweetheart (Hungarian), Crystal Klein and Sanja Matice (Austrian), and Martina Warren (English). Not that I would for a second recommend ignoring the obvious charms of the aforementioned beauties from across the big pond!
The best of the burger and fries group are, IMHO, Tiffany Brookes, Charlie Laine, Crissy Moran, Carli Banks, Rita G, Jamie Hammer, and Mindy Vega. I’d include more but their pics are too small and/or non-exclusive.
There’s a good emphasis on ASS here, which I find is a real plus! There was a time when the site had only 800px photos; then they upgraded many sets to 1024px. Will they do it again, to 1200? That would be nice, but they should just settle on 1600s, NOW, and get proactive for once.
It's also nice that the toys stay in dishwasher on this one. It's just softcore posing and showing plenty of pink, unaided.
Zip files and more frequent updates would also be a step forward. Granted this site has some things really going for it, but given its shortcomings and glacial progress, I can only rate it in the 70’s, as a “might recommend/enjoy at your own risk.” |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|