| User Reviews (10) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Lots of women, many unknown
* Tasteful solo scenes, with real atmosphere
* Simple site layout (but caution!)
* Tons of still photos, if that's your thing |
| Cons: |
* Site navigation is horrifically, comically awful.
* No community atmosphere (i.e., interaction from members and staff)
* A surplus of solo scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined ATK because I'd seen the name on review sites and some of the pics on tgp's. Immediately after joining, disappointment set in. Why? Well...
First, the site layout and navigation is pitiful. Click "movies," and you get to the movies page. The page itself is bare, just an endless list of women's first names. This is the extent of the categorizing and cataloging on the site. Think about it -- you can't search for boy-girl, Asian, etc. You can't search by fantasy. You have to click through all these first names until you get to the type of scene you want. Man ... it's bad.
One other bone to pick: ATK Premium feels like a barren wasteland, as though there's no one behind the site. No company, no directors, no members even. It doesn't have the same community atmosphere as the megasites out there.
On the plus side, there are a lot of fresh-faced women with very natural bodies.
Bottom Line: As other reviewers have said, ATK Premium doesn't deserve the "premium" label. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Content is exclusive with lots of it.
-Content is excellent in quality.
-Fast download speeds
-All photosets available for download in ZIP files |
| Cons: |
-Hardcore content was rather limited
-Videos are only available for download in clips
-Some of the content seemed a little more on the professional side
-No network with the other ATK sites |
| Bottom Line: |
It took me a while to figure out what I wanted to say about ATK Premium. The truth is, I thought it was good site, better than average, but not "Very Good". The quality of pics, wide variety of beautiful women, set up of the site, all of this was great. I just wasn just a little let down by the site.
More than anything, I guess, this is a "buyer beware" sort of thing, especially if you're like me and watched the preview video for ATK Premium, which left me expecting more but not getting it. For example, they say they have "Group Sex". They did, but only a handful of picture sets and videos had more than two people involved.
The videos themselves seemed to be heavy on the "behind the scenes" or interviews of the models, some of whom could not even speak enough English to make those worthwhile. And if you're looking for hardcore, it's hit or miss here. A lot, if not most, of the models did not do any hardcore. Most did lesbian stuff, at least, which is okay, but if you want a lot of good guy/girl action, like I said hit or miss.
Potential members should also know that a fair amount of the hardcore photo sets did not even finish with a money shot of any kind. Amateur or not, the money shot is a necessity, I feel.
As photography based sites go this is one of the best I've seen, however. Like I said, it's some good quality stuff, lots of it, and it's pretty easy to navigate through everything. From that standpoint I recommend it. Just don't join with any expectations. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A lot of content up, both pics and vids.
- Zips.
- Very attractive models for the most part.
- Good navigation, categorization (solo/artistic/etc..), search function, ala ATK style. |
| Cons: |
- ATK has always had a somewhat confusing way of organizing the vid section, and this site is no exception.
- Emphasis is decidedly on the glamourous/artsy side of things which makes the 'A' in ATK kind of non-applicable here.
- Pic size decent (avg 1000 X 1500) but still not where it should be for a "Premium" site.
- Vids look decent (avg 640 X 480, 1200-2000+ kbps) but not as good as they should for a "Premium" site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been to all of ATK's sites and Premium most recently. If I had to live with only one of their sites to the exclusion of all the others, Premium would be my last choice. Why is this?
Well, what we like and don't like is a subjective thing. Two things that were always appealing about ATK were Amateurs and/or Teens, which is what the 'A' and the 'T' in 'ATK' abbreviate. At Premium, the models are hardly amateurs, and despite whatever their average age might be, there is an atmosphere of maturity present which steers quite clear of "teeny-ness" in most of its usual guises. Not that this is a problem necessarily, but it does seem like a bit of a turning away from the original mission of this company.
The impression I get is that this is ATK's contribution to the genre of classy, artsy nudes made popular by sites like Met Art and Hegre's. The women are beautiful and the settings equally so. For me this makes for a certain sterility as far as the libido is concerned, which impacts ninety-five percent of why I purchase subscriptions to these kinds of websites.
While I like the more intimate aspect of some of the videos, I found a few which seemed to show nothing but a model getting her make-up applied or her hair done. I suppose some might like this (and I wouldn't mind at all for a minute or so), but it was too tedious for me. On a positive note, some of the lesbian scenes were among the best I've seen.
Recommended, but with reservations. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (4) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|