Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit ATK Premium

Visit Site

ATK Premium

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Amateur Girls
3. Nude Photography

Kingdom WWW Ops.
10 Sites Listed
Partner: ATK Cash

Monthly: $29.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.99 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $64.99 (3 months, recurring)

View all ATK Premium Site Facts at TBP.

83.0
Feedback History  (20)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 8
Review by TheBestPorn:

86.5
TBP Review

Date: 02-08-14

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Hot original amateur collection.
+  Great-sized collection!
-  Older scenes aren't as sharp.

User Reviews (12)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >

Active
84
slutty (111) 03-23-13  01:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Many attractive models
-Decent sized site overall
-Navigation is good
-Good variety of softcore, lesbian, hardcore
-Camerawork is generally good
-Zips of photosets, newer ones in 3 quality levels
-Newer videos are of respectable quality, typically 4 options available (SD wmv, HD mp4, SD mp4, and portable), I generally downloaded SD mp4
-No DRM, download managers work, respectable biller
-Most girls are natural
-Frequent updates, generally a photo and video set every day
Cons: -Sort of expensive
-No network access, no bonus sites
-Older videos and photos are substandard quality and older movies are often split in parts
-Not a lot of diversity in model body type or ethnicity
-HD scenes seem larger file-size wise than they have to be
-A fair amount (maybe 1/5 or so) of the video material is "behind the scenes" type of stuff, I don't mind it, but could be a negative for some
-Some material is not exclusive
Bottom Line: Generally I think this site is pretty good, but not great. I sort of don't get the whole setup of all the ATK sites, what makes this one premium, is this site exclusively the hot girls? In general, I guess this is the case compared to some of their other sites as the hot/wtf ratio seems to be a good bit higher.

I liked the material here for the most part, but for some reason felt a bit disappointed here. Can't really put my finger on why. Most sites I join, I spend a fair amount more time poking around and checking things out, but I got tired of this one pretty fast for some reason. That isn't to say that they don't have some good material here, they certainly do, I just wasn't super-excited by it I guess.

As for the site itself, the navigation is pretty good: model index, scene ratings, scene tags, it is pretty easy to get around. The girls are generally of the thinner more natural body types, and they have both American and Euro stars.

Overall, I think I would recommend joining this site to those that never had before, but I don't know that I would recommend it as a repeat join even given the update schedule. They seem to do most things very well, and the models are generally quite attractive, so it is certainly worth a look.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
82
Claypaws (44) 06-04-12  06:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -550 models (no silicone), 6800 photo sets, 780,000 photos, 3050 videos. -100% exclusive.
-Mostly attractive models though not many total stunners (but there are some of those too).
-10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot plus some hardcore (but many exceptions to the standard pattern).
-Photosets in three resolutions: 1024, 1500-1600, 3000. (Not all on older sets).
-Updates: 1 to 2 photosets (80-200pics each) daily and 10 to 20 (ave 15min each) videos per month.
-Full and custom zips for all sets and sizes.
-Videos several formats, inc "HD mp4" (1280x720 @ 6Mbps ) and streaming.
-Good model directory and search facility.
-Opt-in for newsletter and promos.
-Set preferences for viewing sizes etc.
-Works well with Firefox and DownThemAll.
-Webmaster responds very fast to emails.
-Bills via CCBill - no regional pricing.
Cons: -Does not play well with download managers except DownThemAll.
-Links time out after a few hours (Karups' last for membership duration).
-Some photographers produce technically flawed colour (but most are good).
-Videos at 1280x720 6mbps possibly not high enough for video-philes but I am no judge of video.
-Lower proportion of extremely attractive models than ATK Galleria or Nubiles.
-Pages can be very slow to load, but zip download speeds are good.
Bottom Line: ATK Premium (ATKP) is the smallest of the ATK sites, though still not a small site by general standards. For example, it has half the number of models and videos as Nubiles, but 60% more photos.

It is the ATK site that I find most difficult to categorise. I join it once or twice per year but I find it less exciting than the other ATK sites.

Its women are shaved, aged between 18 and 29, most are Caucasian girl-next-door types but there are some ethnic models (9 Black, 9 Asian, 20 Hispanic) and some catwalk type models. Though most models do not have tattoos and piercings, they are not excluded from ATKP. Many of the women also appear on ATK Galleria (ATKG) but there is no duplication of photos or videos. Some models only appear on ATKP and not on the other ATK sites and there is usually no obvious reason why ATK have chosen to put them on ATKP. When a model is on ATKP and ATKG, her content on ATKG is usually hotter but not always. Rather occasionally, a model's best content is on ATKP.

ATKP represents the work of 44 photographers from around the world, compared to ATKG's 97. Many photographers appear on both sites but some of ATKP's photographers do not appear on ATKG. For example, PJA Media shoots for Premium but not Galleria and his content is of such high quality that it even gets praised by other ATK photographers in the site comments. Sometimes a model who is on both ATKG and ATKP will have one photographer's work on ATKG and another's on ATKP but there is no pattern.

Photosets on ATKP are largely in a similar style to ATKG though usually ATKP content is less raunchy, less committed than ATKG, with some notable exceptions. Bree Daniels has superb content on ATKP, for example. If you like her, her content would justify a membership all by itself. ATKP does have some "artistic photos", which ATKG does not. "Artistic" means black and white, or abstract type constructions with models draped in silk or flowers. There is not much of it, far less than on METART, but there is enough to be noticeable whereas ATKG has none.

Older photo sets might be only in 1024 and 1600 or only 1024. There is more outdoor content on ATKP than on the other ATK sites. Photos are usually well lit. Most are properly colour balanced but there are a lot of exceptions and some photographers consistently produce poor colour. There is perhaps a slightly greater proportion of technically poorer content on Premium than on Galleria. Most if not all sets start fully clothed and many include explicit open leg shots, usually but not always less extreme than ATKG and definitely less extreme than ATKH.

ATKP has more video per model than the other ATK sites. It averages just over five videos per model compared to ATKG's just under three. But, as with ATKG and ATKH, some ATKP models have no videos and some have ten. Video is similar size and bitrate to ATKG (see Pros).

ATKP has a similar distribution between toys, non-toys, solo, bg, gg, to the other ATK sites, with the majority being solo without toys..

A model's photo sets are added about a week apart but videos are less predictable and not all models do them.

I cautiously recommend this site to lovers of women with no silicone, in good quality, solo photo-sets. Video enthusiasts should find plenty of content too. It contains bg and gg but it does not come over as a hardcore site. If you are a hardcore hound, you will probably not enjoy it. As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate the quality of that content.

"Cautiously recommend" because I feel this site has a much less strong identity than the other ATK sites. That has made the review very difficult for me to write. Galleria and Hairy have a "wow factor" that Premium has not. It is easier to say what ATKP is not than to characterise what it is. It does not have the young teen focus or toy bias of Nubiles. It does not have the raunchiness and freshness of ATK Galleria or the explicitness of ATK Hairy. It is not an art site like MetArt or Femjoy.

But it has enough excellent content to justify joining at least once and it is small enough that the disappointing content is easy to avoid. The tour at http://www.atkpremium.com/tour/page/1 gives a very good guide to what you will find. http://free.atkpremium.com/main.php includes many full resolution sample photos and is updated weekly. If you have never joined any ATK site before, I would not recommend starting with ATKP but neither would I advise you not to. I recommend it to anyone who collects models rather than niches and who likes some of the models here.

I have joined the site several times over many years. "member < 1 month" applies just to this current repeat.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
70*
laxattack34 (2) 11-17-08  02:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies)

Expired
79
dilbert4100 (10) 07-17-08  10:09am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
85
WeeWillyWinky (88) 04-15-08  09:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
81
qualsite34 (33) 07-02-07  04:16am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

Expired
89
exotics4me (463) 06-24-07  01:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
82
Drooler (218) 06-14-07  01:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
81
senorim (19) 02-22-07  06:46pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
88*
Horny Ryan (Disabled) 02-19-07  11:53pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 12 Next Page >
User Comments (8)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

slutty (111) 03-03-13  12:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)

Cross Sell

Just an FYI, for those with the time and the extra $3.99, the trial cross sell to amkingdom is full access with no limits, so at least you can get two sites (briefly) for $34. Connection timeouts are long, so you can queue up the DL manager for quite a bit.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Capn (28) 06-19-12  10:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Underwhelmed.

Well, I took a month's sub.

Whilst there are a few gems there, they really take some finding.

There is not the quantity or quality of material there that I would have expected, TBH.

I don't feel hard done by, just not quite as satisfied with the material as I expected to be.

Cap'n. :0/

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Capn (28) 12-29-11  06:41am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Style of Content?

This is one of the ATK sites I have never joined.

I get the impression it is geared towards the 'glam/artsy' style of content, but seems to feature, or used to, quite a few periphery bells, whistles & add-ons.

What is the style of content mainly, please?

Cap'n. :0/

Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Drooler (218) 12-09-11  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Redesigned Version Started Today

I've been hanging around this site probably longer than I should, but it was nice to see as of today that it has a new design quite similar to the one for ATK Galleria.

I was getting quite tired of the clunky, texty old way the recent updates page was, so it's a very welcome change!

It looks great and from what I experienced looking and searching around, it works pretty well, too.

And there was a new gallery of Eufrat. Yay!

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

messmer (137) 11-19-08  12:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)

Adding to some of the comments!

In my opinion none of the ATK sites is what it used to be.

A few years ago someone found that a certain formula worked and they've been stuck in that mode ever since. I subscribed to Galleria, a deeply disappointing experience for me (too much sameness in the various picture sets) despite the raves of others.

Re-subscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy and found, this time around, mostly unexciting photography and photographers who should either retire or change their way of shooting a set of pictures. Videos have stayed of the same quality over the years rather than advancing with the new technology available.

The one thing that really drove me crazy was the unresponsive attitude on the part of the webmasters. In their "Forum," the monthly cover states and has been stating "Amatures" for months.

I sent, not complaints, but observation after observation that for a company with the reputation of ATK, specializing in amateurs it was an embarrassment to keep misspelling "Amateur" on the cover of their monthly magazine and never got an answer or a change. Months later it probably still reads "Amature!"

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Sickboy3 (0) 11-19-08  07:00am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Use of download managers

If you use a download manager, they will suspend your use for 10 days.....this is not good......I will do business elsewhere!! Here is their statement:

It appears that your login was disabled for download manager usage or other automated downloading. We regret that download managers and automatic or robotic downloading methods are not supported by our sites and will cause you to be disabled for up to 10 days. Use of robots such as download managers or queuing the downloads in any way are not allowed under our terms of service as this is considered data mining.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

exotics4me (463) 05-18-08  08:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)

New, lower price

This is a site that I have enjoyed because I see it as different than the typical site with pretty original sets, including some of the models staying dressed from start to finish.

The price is now $24.95 instead of the previous $29.95.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Sharkhunter (0) 06-23-07  09:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Not as good as it used to be...

This was one of my favourite sites, in that it truly lived up to its 'premium' title and stood from the regular ATK site. The selection of models, although small, was excellent in that it included such names as Sophie Moone, Lenka Horakova and Monika Matejovska (Sharon M). Most of the photosets were tasteful nude, though there was a nice selection of harder material.

However the site experienced a fair bit of downtime in April of 2007, and despite its return promising great things this has not been the case. The classier models appear to have disappeared, and more recent updates have included girls who must have missed out on the initial auditions and selections many times over. To be frank, some have been pretty ugly and not worthy of a site of this type and reputation.

All in all, while I would have been happy to subscribe to this site a year or so ago, these days it is simply not worth the money. Rather than 'premier' it has become somewhat third division - and the regular ATK site is these days a lot better in terms of quality and content.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit ATK Premium

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. ATK Natural & Hairy (3) 91.7 87.5
2. ATK Galleria (2) 89.7 86.5
3. ATK Premium (2) 83.0 86.5
4. ATK Exotics (1) 82.0 85.5
5. Aunt Judy's (1) 80.0 84.5
6. ATK Petites (0) N/A 86.0
7. ATK Archives (0) N/A 83.5
8. ATK Movies (0) N/A 83.0
9. AT Kingdom Network (0) N/A N/A
10. ATK Girlfriends (0) N/A N/A

View All: Company Sites (10)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.55 seconds.