+ Exclusive Amateur Natural/Hairy Content, Big Pic & Vid Archive.
+ U.S. & Euro Models, Nice Variety of Models & Content Styles.
- Video Qualty & Download Options Drop on Older Scenes.
- Navigation Could Be Fine-Tuned, Videos Aren't Categorized.
User Reviews (23)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Paris P (90)
Models: Americans. Pretty gals, many GND types.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: Good. Being a female photographer gives her a different perspective. You can tell that the models look comfortable and ready to do what asked. Her framing of shots is excellent.
Face Shots: excellent
Body Shots: excellent
Crotch Shots: Very good
Ass Shots: Very good
Explicit close-ups: good
Overall: A strong photographer.
PKM (80)
Models: Americans. Very similar selection as Alicia S. More to the glam style, lots of make-up.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Almost glam style. Lots of dildo stuff. Gets them to pose ok.
Face Shots: good
Body Shots: good
Crotch Shots: good
Ass Shots: good
Explicit close-ups: ok, could use more.
Overall: Good work. I have to wonder what the relation between Alicia, PKM and HMB is. Very similar. Shared models…. Hmmmm
Riley Williams/RWL (90 – 5 = 85)
Models: Americans from the Pacific Northwest. Very many GND types. Mostly college gals. Wide range of sizes, shapes, colors. He recently returned from a break for a couple of years. His later models tend to be overweight.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: Excellent. He is a master of posing the models and getting the shots he want. Models always look comfortable and ready to do what asked. He also needs to increase from the scant 70-80 shots per set he provides (-5)
Face Shots: excellent
Body Shots: excellent
Crotch Shots: excellent
Ass Shots: poor to good
Explicit close-ups: very good. He used to do peeing sets, but seems to have stopped this. In general he seems a bit tamer than he was in the early 2000’s
Overall: An American master. He needs to upgrade his model stack a little, but he has the skills. I personally wish he would get more ass shots that were not from a weird angle. Be direct now and then.
Roman K (75)
Models: Russians. His models are cute, but have too much Russian porn-star in them and lack realness. Pros and Ams.
Sets: Moslty indoors. Lighting good.
Direction: good. Not very innovative and his poses are boring.
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: good , mostly at distance
Crotch Shots: poor
Ass Shots: poor
Explicit close-ups: poor , some peeing shots
Overall: Roman is typical of Russian porn. There is a sterile quality and the models do not generate much life as compared to J Ant. Much of the posing is from a distance and there are far too few explicit shots.
Robin W./RWA (80)
Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. Typically shoots the same gals as Sean R.
Sets: Mostly indoors, good lighting
Direction: Very good. Gets them to pose ok. Could be more versatile. Models seem comfortable. Good with a camera
Face Shots: Very good
Body Shots: Very good
Crotch Shots: good
Ass Shots: poor
Explicit close-ups: generally poor
Overall: Good models. It is nice to have a different perspective on the same models that Sean R uses. Robin is much more tame and not very explicit. Score would be better if he included some more ass shots and was a little more explicit.
Sean R. (95)
Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. A whole lot of variety from freaks & skanks to moms to GDN types.
Sets: Mostly Indoors. Lighting Outstanding
Direction: Excellent. This guy knows how to get the models to pose to get the shots he wants. At the same time, the models seem comfortable.
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: poor. Rarely shows good shots of the breasts and full body shots.
Crotch Shots: Excellent
Ass Shots: Excellent, he is one of the few that can really frame a female ass and associated nether regions to get the greatest shots.
Explicit close-ups: Excellent
Overall: The premier ATK photographer today. Lots of shots, lots of poses. He knows how to frame a shot and get the right lighting. Others should sit up and take some lessons from Sean. He is a master at explicit photography. His weakness is that he universally fails to take many pictures of the models full bodies and breasts. Yes, they are there, but you have to look at a lot of shots to get an idea of what their bodies, in total look like.
Tom Mayes TMI (75 – 5 = 70)
Models: Americans. Nice variety of models. Plenty of GND-types.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: poor. Not very innovative and his poses are boring. He seems to be afraid to get close to the models so his work feels distant, cold. A lost opportunity here. He also needs to increase from the scant 75-80 shots per set he provides (-5)
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: good, but everything looks like he shot from across the room. Get closer, they don’t bite (unless you are lucky)
Crotch Shots: poor
Ass Shots: poor, none. Doesn’t seem to think this perspective is too important.
Explicit close-ups: poor / none
Overall: He has room for improvement. His older work was better.
Vladimir Fillit VLF (80)
Models: Russians. Very cute selection. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: very good
Crotch Shots: very good
Ass Shots: good
Explicit close-ups: good, more spread shots would be nice
Overall: Good work, would rate higher if he tried to get more shots from behind
Walter K (WAK) (85)
Models: Russians. Very cute selection with nice variety. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: very good
Crotch Shots: very good
Ass Shots: very good
Explicit close-ups: very good, more spread shots would be nice
Overall: Good work. About on par with the other Russians. Marginally better than VLF.
I'd joined this site almost two years ago. Wasn't too thrilled by a lot of the women, though a few were really hot.
Then I recently got an offer to rejoin for $20. I see they've started adding hardcore as of Dec. last year.
Frankly, I don't think that step was as critical as simply getting better looking women. Having gone through their archives, I feel I've done it mostly for Queen and Country.
Older doesn't bother me, to a point at least, but fat and/or shriveled just ain't what I'm after. And there are a couple of girls in there, young ones, who would have looked nice had they not apparently had a head-on collision with a hardware store (face piercings).
Messmer's right in his review that the photographers produce sets that could be clones of each other. Being an ass man, I was disppointed that the recent Michelle from Hungary, a very hot girl, never got to show her goods the way Josi, another dynamo, was able to. Who (or which robot) did the shooting made all the difference.
"Toby" is probably my favorite photographer there. "Atomic W" does OK sometimes.
I feel I got my money's worth, thanks to my waiting so long and their generous discount. But as I was saying, ugly-solo isn't going to be improved upon by ugly-likes-duckies.
There's no other ATK site that has this problem, generally speaking. Why it does at all is beyond me.
I really liked this site, as I am a fan of natural hairy women. My only complaint is that there is a lot of overlap between this site and ATKexotics. It is not worthwhile to join both sites.
I just rejoined ATK Natural & Hairy...and discovered two old favorites are no longer there: Florence and Fawn. Ouch....but, this is still a great site! For those of us who like the '70's look, this is THE place.
(Anyone know were the two favs call home these days? Thanks for any information).
Hey guys, looking to see if anyone is a current member of ATK Hairy and if they have started adding any boy/girl hardcore photos or movies to the site as of yet?
I joined All Hairy because they had hardcore hairy content, but the site just doesn't stack up to the quality of ATK Hairy so I am considering joining the site once my membership to Galleria expires. I hope they have started adding hardcore as I never understood why it was never part of the site in the first place. I see they have hairy hardcore in Galleria, but would prefer not to be a member of both sites at the same time to get what I want with hairy girls.
I was watching one of the latest video updates this evening and had to turn off the sound before I could enjoy it because the videographer was such a clumsy, insecure Klutz when it came to establishing rapport with the model. The model kept giving him looks: are you for real? One example, she wore a gorgeous short satin nightgown and he asked her "would you take off that thingie .. whatever you call it?" "A NIGHTIE?" was her startled answer. She also pointed out in the beginning that she had quite a luxuriant bush and rather than come back with the reply that, in that case, she was the perfect model for ATK Hairy, he lamely suggested that he could always trim it for her after the session .. with hedge shears! ATK, please have a look at some AbbyWinters videos and see how filming can be done with grace and without insulting the intelligence of the models by an insecure wreck who's blathering on mindlessly.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
