| User Reviews (17) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photos, zipped for easy download
Tons of updates
Lots of content
New/new to me stuff of some favorite girls |
| Cons: |
Hit and miss quality of models and videos
Most videos in multiple parts
Lots of upsell to join other, related sites
Late 90s navigation and presentation |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined ATK Galleria after hearing from one of my favorite models that she had some content there. I was quite impressed by the sheer number of updates and the amount of content the site offered in its catalog.
While the girls aren't all to my taste, there are a lot of cuties here to browse and everyone has different tastes, so odds are you will find something to like. Or you would, if there were better navigation and search features. It's not that nav and search aren't ok, it's just that the results you get are hit and, too often, miss. I felt like I was back in the 1990s trying to find that one keeper in a sea of same-looking eastern european girls - and don't get me wrong, I think the eastern european ladies are lovely!
I do like that there are a few ways to organize photos, including by photographer.
Overall, this is the kind of site that is worth a one-month membership on occasion. The variety is excellent, but you'll probably find enough frustrations over time that a long-term relationship just isn't worth the hassle. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nothing wrong with the amount of videos and photosets here.
Just have some problems with the quality, the exclusive-thing and a bit more. See below.
Very fine updates - this seems to be one of the best in the field- congrats...
Good variation in models, solo-stuff, hc, bg, lez and more.
Later video-quality has improven...a lot.
Only a few other sites can beat almost 10.000 videos - BUT...the amount is based on parted files, arghh...
Zip for all photosets.
Not too large video-files - full scenes (parted files also at hand.)
Very large photo galleries - cannot count them all.
Average to good navigation. |
| Cons: |
Certainly not sure about exclusives.
Annoying parting of especially video-files where updates of the same scene comes on different dates - a serious bummer.
Too many videos of average and certainly not 2009-quality.
Price too high.
The "search-machine" is far from accurate - you get guided to stuff, you never searched for... |
| Bottom Line: |
Difficult Bottom Line here - but generally this site promiss a heck of a lot - but when you get down to bussiness the results are somehow a disapointment.
This is spoken from the video-review point of view - and here the stuff is overwhelmed by too much older scenes, to much stuff which seems based on licens from elsewhere.
Anyway, I spend hours and hours searching the video-department here, and man, found very little to keep.
And what really pisses me off is the way the video-files are parted - and named. Mostly you have to wait days or weeks to get the whole scene together - a serious bummer.
BUT: It seems ATK has listened to those complaints - but only lately. The latest updates - but only the very latest - has this new input at the previews for the videos: "Full Scenes" - about time.
So let's see if they keep that up - and maybe it'd been worth a better score.
The data is shortly:
Video-files in wmv and mov. Parted - and latest full scenes for a few.
Not too big video-files: full scenes: 100-170 Mb.
Parted: about 40-50 Mb
Photos: Zip for full sets (size about: 1500x1200)
Finally there is a broad variation of solo, hc (b/g) and lez. Too much lez for my taste.
A hope that this site with their newer videosets of full scenes will grow in a way of better/more full scenes in general. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- TONS of content.
- Great for photo lovers!!
- Diverse selection of photographers.
- 10+ updates each day, 6 days a week!
- HOT girls.
- On average 10 galleries per girl (sometimes less, often more!!) |
| Cons: |
- Videos are split up (though, if you're like me, you join this for the photos, not the videos).
- A few models are split between their different sites (ATK Natural and Hairy, ATK Galleria, ATK Exotics, ATK Archives, and ATK Premium).
- There was a 'dark ages' around 2005-2007 where they were using too much generic, eastern European talent over hot-ass American and Canadian girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the FIRST internet site that, 5+ years ago, introduced me to the revolutionary world of internet porn. No more impulsiveness at the porno store; if old school porn was AOL-by-the-hour, this site was unlimited-internet-per-month.
There is a reason I've spent more months since then subscribed to this site than not - it stays fresh, it's highly erotic, and it is amazing.
Of course, you have to like pictures.
Many of my introductions to the queen-pins of porn (Cherry Poppins, Hillary Scott, Hailey Young, Missy Monroe) were through this site. However, there are just as many girls who I never saw again - after seeing 5-10 galleries of!
Unless this site makes any unfortunate changes, I forsee being an on-off member for many more years. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredible amount of content, both movies and pic sets.
Reasonable price for this amount of content ($30 a month).
Massive amounts of updates (About 10 vids per week and upwards of 30-50 pics sets per week).
All exclusive content.
Lots of models are either exclusive to the site, or at least not all over the internet.
Good mix of both american and european models.
Many different niches covered in the site such as masturbating, toys, hardcore, lingerie, etc.
Good looking girls!
Personal data of models fairly in depth, gives a personal feel to the models to an extent. |
| Cons: |
Site navigation is poor and archaic.
Minimal screen caps to preview videos, and small at that.
Site design is bland.
No preview trailers for any movies.
Cannot view all of some model's content, as it is sometimes split between ATK Galleria and the "archives" which you have to join separately.
Videos tend to be short, and the quality not great.
Camera work needs improvement in some scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined ATK again recently after avoiding it for over a year due to the same problem they still have, the horrible navigation. Even so, this site is still one of the best out there and I'm not going to even try to deny that. More details on specific topics:
1. We'll hit the negatives first. I REALLY dislike the navigation of this site, and especially with their video updates. Unfortunately, the video scene browsing has actually gotten WORSE than when I was a member before, which is very frustrating. Let me explain. Updates of all types are broken into categories, such as movie updates, masturbation updates, toy updates, etc. Once you click on an update you are brought to another page that has multiple updates within that update. Say you click Toys update 215. You are then brought to a page with about 15 different girls (represented by one small pic), each of which links to a different toy pic set for that girl. For the pic sets it is kind of annoying, but not too bad. For the movie updates, however, it is horrible. Clicking on a "movie" update brings you to a page with about 10-12 movie updates, and all you see is about 4 VERY SMALL screen cap pics that represent the movie. How am I supposed to know if I want to download a movie based on 4 small pics representing upwards of 15 minutes of action? The reason this is worse than it used to be is because there was a period of time when the movie updates were done in the same format, but with 5-10 LARGE screen caps to show you what the movie was like. What happened to that? No trailers also doesn't help this.
2. Now that I'm done ranting about that, on to positives. The amount of content on this site is BAFFLING! Even with them putting a lot of the old content into the separate "archive" site, there is still more to see here than I know what to do with. There have been days I've been determined to look through at least all the models under one letter category (all models starting with letter S for example) and can't even complete that. There is that much. And the frequency of updates is also just as amazing, even more than Karups in quantity.
3. The models on this site are very attractive, and tend to be around the teen to early 20 age range. Not much in the way of MILFS, so if you want your MILF fix perhaps you should look elsewhere.
4. I will also mention that the site has a good variety of content, but do NOT expect to see extreme type content. Toy sets are with small vibrators typically, masturbations are tame, and there is nothing in the way of fisting or things of that nature. There are hardcore scenes, but don't come looking for FTV or Alsscan type content.
5. Another thing that may be of interest to people is that almost all models have "personal data", which lists their stats along with a lot of personal likes and dislikes.
The site isn't perfect, but there is so much here it's hard to get too caught up with the faults. Definitely worth a membership. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 1.5 million photos online
- 4000+ movies in Quicktime and WMV formts
- Updated 6 days a week with huge updates
- Photos available in 1536X1024 size + 3 smaller sizes
- ZIP files available for download
- Wide variety of catagories like uniform - boy/girl - foot fetish etc
- Over 2000 Models with model index and bios |
| Cons: |
- The girls are hot but the photos seem to have lost their amateur feel.
- Seems to have more focus on European girls now rather than North American
- Video quality still has room for improvement
- Navigation is still a little old school.
- A bit more upsells then their used to be for their other sites and DVD's.
- No bonus live feeds or sites |
| Bottom Line: |
ATK Galleria is still an excellent site for fans of photos. They have over 1.5 million photos from over 2000 models to choose from. The photos are crisp and have very good color.
The focus seems to be more babes than amateur these days. Not sure if this is the actual girls or maybe just the camera equiptment being used these days which makes the quality look more professional. Either way I'd love to see more natural and less professional looks for most of these girls.
I also gave a lower score because of the focus on more European women rather than North American that I recall from previous years of the site.
I got $5 off the site from Paysite Discounts so that definitely makes ATK Galleria a very good deal as they update with the most content I've seen at any other site. Especially for fans of photographs, even though the video is actually pretty good overall too. I'd love to see more HD video though.
If you like hot 18-23 year old women and not always in pure amateur looking content, then you can not go wrong with ATK Galleria. You get an extremely good bang for your buck here, especially if you use the discount. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge selection of attractive young women.
Nice sub-divisions into categories like lingerie, pregnant, Co-ed, upskirt etc.
Fair to good download speed. |
| Cons: |
Huge selection of attractive young women ... who all look too glamorous to be amateurs. Most who would be tempted to subscribe to an "Amateur Kingdom" would do so in order to download pictures of "girls next door." The models' wardrobe is plain enough to qualify (denim lovers rejoice) but the faces belong on a glamor site.
The different categories are not always accurate. Being a lingerie fan I found very little true "lingerie" contents, most I came across so far were sets of models who had their panties on to start out with.
Under "upskirt" I found many sets of pictures that didn't really represent what's usually understood under the term. Sets of models sprawled on beds and sofas being photographed from the foot of said pieces of furniture may be technically upskirt but not for the afficionado of the genre.
Customer service "specialist" acted very defensively when I expressed disappointment with the site and enquired if it would be possible to switch me to "Natural and Hairy." |
| Bottom Line: |
Frankly, the site is a great disappointment because I had such a positive experience with ATK Natural and Hairy. I gave that site an 89 in my review while this one ends up with a far lower score. Mildly recommended to anyone 18 - 25 years old, not recommended for those who look for natural or for diversity or who are over thirty.
May 13 Update: The longer I am with this site the more I get irritated by the cookie cutter quality of the picture sets. There is a monotonous sameness to the way the models pose and to the way they are dressed, it seems that only the faces change. I am reducing my rating to 75. Probably to a storm of protest because ATK is usually a quality product but this site isn't. At least not in my eyes. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# models are equal to any of the top sites, beautiful from USA, Europe, Russia
# offers both softcore and hardcore in each shoot as the shoots are shot beautifully usually indoors
#this is another sampler site: upskirt, lingerie, action,coed's in uniforms, coeds with toys, masterbation, amateur, masterbation, pregnant* (*new)
# 1536x1024 pics
# best upskirt category of its type
# models have done a lot of updates with different themes. mostly 10-15; some have done much more than this
#bottomless amount of porn - you won't have time to see all of it.
#I don't have enough time to look at all my favorite model archives in a month.
#1.5 million pics-wow
#thousands of models |
| Cons: |
#older pics are smaller 1024x683
# since so many categories are included; not one is really mastered like in a site that focuses on just one category; like outdoor nudes.
#miss out on outdoor locales
#volume of material makes navigation a challenge |
| Bottom Line: |
prior to joining atk, I considered one of the artsy nude sites. But I wanted to see models in clothes- like seeing a model body in some tight denim shorts; yet a set that ends with a strong dose of pussy. Atk never dissapointed me in that regard.
ATK is an all inclusive site for those who want to sample different genres of porn without having to pay for multiple sites. I have joined atk five times and have not been dissapointed.
ATK has offered me more porn than I have the time or stamina to look at with some very hot models.
the models are beautiful. 18-23- they put my temp meter all the way to red. They will tease you to the brink- Atk offers a really strong dose of porn.
here are the categories for you to consider joining this site:
hardcore galleries include: masterbation, coeds with toys, blowjobs, foot fetish,action, experimental coeds, pregnant, and watersports (peeing)
softcore galleries: amaterus coeds, babes,upskirts/ panties, coeds in uniforms, nudism,and lingerie |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Massive collection. Updates photos Tues. to Sat. every week.
+Many hot American and Euro babes
+Photos usually at 1536px since Jan. 2007
+Much content not seen elsewhere.
+Many niches: amateurs, coeds, babes, lingerie, uniforms, masturbation, feet, lesbian (“experimental coeds”), blowjobs, hardcore action, etc.
+Excellent, unparalleled search features by months, single days, model names, and many model and niche types
+Member participation in voting on models and on each photoset. |
| Cons: |
-Photo quality varies greatly, even now, from vivid color/clarity to poorly lit, “orange skinned models,” etc.
-A few “no way” models
-Non-exclusive content, same as from sites like TeenDreams and 1byDay; smaller pic sizes, too (but still good at 1536). 1by sets split between SC and HC galleries here. (That’s really cheating!)
-Vids segmented over weeks! Ugh!
-Zips of photos are by-gallery-page. 10 pages = 10 zip files to compile together! Such menial tasking is no fun. |
| Bottom Line: |
Like other PU members who’ve written about it, I’ve been a long-time fan of this site. How many sites offer 16+ gallery sets per day, meaning 80+ per 5-day week? 6,400 galleries is the total on quick estimate; could be more. Can’t beat it for value if you’re a photo fan. On pic size as well, they whip other large collections such as Twistys.
I also like that voting on photosets is distinct from voting on models. I’ve avoided voting on sites where only the galleries get rated as I haven’t wanted some models to suffer “collateral damage,” so to speak. I don't know how much much effect the voting actually has, though.
As for the vids, ~24 new HC, lez, and solo ones come each Monday. 213 such collections to date. 640x480, WMV and QT options for each, 70 to 160MB/7 to 12+ min. each, going back at least 30 collections. At least more recently the segments are longer. Some I've seen elsewhere, but, not bad!
Improvements needed, in priority order are:
1. Provide all-in-one zips! (ATKP Premium does!) That pop-up thing that replicates downloading by the page is utterly superfluous.
2. Improve image quality where needed. Stuff that looks like late ’90’s crap doesn’t cut it anymore, even at 1536px.
3. Do as little non-exclusive content as possible.
4. Reduce the obsessive upskirt and toy shots. Drop “pregnant.” (Too scary!)
Was really tempted to rate this site in the 90’s. Came very close! Call it an 89.9. I recommend it for sure, with a few caveats. |
| Respond: |
12 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (12) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All ATK Galleria Activity - ATK Galleria Reviews - ATK Galleria Comments - ATK Galleria News
