| User Reviews (20) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Recent videos very high quality (models and image quality)
2. Astonishingly fast download
3. More content than I expected
4. If you like the niche, this does it well |
| Cons: |
1. Same format for each scene - often rather sterile
2. All models essentially 'playing the same role' led by director
3. Rather clunky layout - a little difficult to browse
4. Will anyone ever figure-out why that ambient background music is used...? |
| Bottom Line: |
Thankfully, no problems here with the reported download limits. Older videos are hit-and-miss, but recent stuff is very high-quality POV.
I had to drop a quick review to express bafflement over the download speed - I just got 6.5MB/sec! For perspective, that's *20 times* faster than I download from Videobox on a fast day. It was like dragging a file from a USB drive.
Older videos are sometimes flaky - overexposed and rather like watching Casper give head. The guy is rather too 'present', asking the same questions and following the same formula with each girl. The cost is high. And I don't expect many regular updates. But I imagine most people sign-up for a month and just grab the stuff they want. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Sexy model interviews at the beginning of each clip.
+ Full intercourse worked in between blowjobs.
+ Consistently attractive models.
+ Good download speeds/download manager friendly. |
| Cons: |
- A little pricey, especially considering the amount of content.
- Only one update a week.
- The Web site isn't intuitive.
- Scenes are repetitive. (It is a blowjob site so somewhat expected.)
- Girls in a state of full or partial dress during sex scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Amateur Allure delivers on the blowjob niche. If you want to see hot girls happily sucking cock, that's what you get!
The new video updates are published in 1080p. Slightly older videos are in 720p. If you really dig into the archive the clips are lower resolution/bit rate. The production quality is consistent throughout.
The monthly rate is a negative for this site. Considering the amount of content, number of updates (currently once a week) and lack of any network access make $36 a month a little pricey compared to the competition. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Amateur Allure deserves a new review, because they have upgraded the site to HD! (Thank you for listening!)
And it is true HD: 1920x1080 29,97 fps coded around 4500 kbit/s, so yeah... true fullHD with a reasonable bitrate. Bravo!
All the things in the past are still as it is (in a good way):
+ the most incredible attractive girls (around their twenties), all _very_ eager to perform.
Engaged in hot sexual acts in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, being fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Using a spoon if hey have to. Truly Amazing Content.
+ What else? Great make-up and setting. |
| Cons: |
Unfortunately, also the cons remained more or less:
- Only one update per week (on friday).
- Ridiculous high priced in EUROs ... 36 EURO for one month? Come on... that is 45 USD! Please... one (low)rate for all! We horny Europeans will thank you for it.
- Ridiculous expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is obviously still struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with beautiful glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure)
- HD conversion of old clips is way behind. |
| Bottom Line: |
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Now that Amateur Allure has gone HD, they have excelled themselves into an even higher level. Great Stuff... original content, hypnotic lighting in their eyes.
For example: Look at Remy LaCroix, the upcoming star for Elegant Angel ... check her out on AmateurAllure to discover how *possesed* she is with sexual hunger (don't worry, she got plenty of nurishment here).
This is still a relatively small site with amazing original, even unique content in high quality. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I finally understand the name of this website. Amateur does not refer to the girls (anymore)... since these are hardly amateur... The term 'amateur' refers to the website owners! (in the most best positive ways)!
Personally, I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference and I find it utmost pleasurable to watch them do the most outrageous sexual acts as if they were under a secret spell. These girls are really hot and Amateur Allure, makes them feel good too.
My advice to the site owner:
+ Thank you for upgrading to HD
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to HD to provide better value with minimum effort
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallureHD a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base.
European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD. (This trick still works).
Subcribe for 90 days for a better value per month. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
haagar wrote 1 review (05-02-11) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The highest of high quality in terms of talent and video.
-Simple interface.
-Fast downloads.
-Easy to cancel, no games, no cross-sells.
-See girls early in career who never swallowed again or do so very rarely. |
| Cons: |
-Highly repetitive scenes with the same 3 acts in every one.
-Thin content with only 500 scenes, no real bonus networks
-Updates are infrequent for such a high cost
-Streaming doesn't work well, if at all.
-Older videos have limited download options.
-Aliased names of Pros are annoying and misleading. Majority of girls are from agencies and are not amateurs.
-Download limits, both daily and simultaneous. |
| Bottom Line: |
High quality website, but it's all the same. Every scene is the next, with few exceptions. The quality is there, but it all runs together. Shoot, open, questions, swallow, repeat. Showing the load is cool now and then, but allowing it to be more natural and un-directed would be better at times. Needs anal, MMF, MFF etc. No behind the scenes, no fetish stuff aside from the robotic swallows, no variety.
Its cool they are independent and probably working on a shoestring budget, but the content is razor thin. 500 scenes or so can be legally ripped inside a week, then what? What will bring you back? $36 for a few new scenes a month will not cut it, no way no how. It would take another 500 scenes for me to rejoin. So, on that front, 100gb of space gets you everything, which is good or bad, depending on your point of view.
I marginally recommend the site, as they would do themselves proud by expanding it a bit. After a week, I have a lot of good jerk material, but I am bored. The really good sites give you a reason to stay, this one does not. It doesn't make it bad, it just makes it limited.
UPDATE: Rating lowered to 75.
As of July 2012, they imposed a 4 file simultaneous download limit, in addition to their 5 GB p/day limit. What this says is they don't have a good volume of content and they focus on the items that add no value. The only thing that is amateur about this site are the guys who run it. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene. |
| Cons: |
Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns. |
| Bottom Line: |
Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)
In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")
Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.
The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
HeatherMcXxx wrote 1 review (09-13-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (16) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
