| User Reviews (10) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Some of the most beautiful models I have seen on the internet
- Quality on videos is good enough, 600 on high end, but a nice near 2000 bitrate helps out
- The site as a whole has a pretty classy feel for the most part, it has almost what I would call, playful curiousity from the girls.
- The pictures look nice, but see cons
- Download speeds are blazing for me, nearly 1,400kb/s
- Original models, or at least most are for me. Some are known porn stars, but I'm guessing maybe 25% are amateurs.
- Funny comments from Thomas, though he does get boring after awhile, reminds me a lot of Dream Stash in that sense. |
| Cons: |
- Price, $33 is just too much, it should be at most $24.95.
- Pictures are barely reaching 1000 on high end and cannot be downloaded in zip files.
- Thomas, as funny as he is at times, he seems to be stuck on the same joke from clip to clip.
- Sex is like Sex by Numbers, nearly every scene follows the exact same pattern, and combined with Thomas' repetitive humor, the site itself becomes repetitive
- The big one, split movie scenes on older videos. I am at the point that I won't even download these unless it is a favorite actress of mine. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site wowed me right off the bat with the gorgeous models. The site also has a modern look to it, and overall, has a classy look and feel to it.
Then there is the content. Sex, blowjobs, and cum in mouth which is swallowed. Everytime. No body cumshots, just right in the mouth and on the face. I'm not a big fan of facials, so this becomes repetitive very fast. Still, the models are gorgeous and they will keep you coming back.
The pictures are disappointing, such gorgeous women, but no hi-res and no downloadable zips? It makes the pictures virtually useless. The video quality is good enough at 600 high end, near 2000 bitrate, but then there are those split scenes, which are also all but useless to me. I have a strange time with the videos as well. For some reason they are letterboxing on my monitor, not for sure why, but that looks odd and makes me click on the letterbox hoping it will go away.
The site still has some models that make it worth joining. It kind of makes you feel like you are on a date with a woman that is out of your league, but you keep spending money on her. The only real cons are the repititive nature of the videos. By the 3rd one, I knew what was going to happen and when. I keep coming back to how beautiful the models are though, and that should be stressed as the #1 Pro that outweighs all of cons. The preview is pretty good, check it out and see if the models catch your eyes like mine, then for one month only it is highly recommended. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models. Thomas recruits some quality girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, some models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene. |
| Cons: |
Thomas seems like an amiable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can become rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay carumba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. |
| Bottom Line: |
If oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long.
In that month, though, you'll enjoy lots of gorgeous girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, though it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.
The music is fascinating to me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and charming personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they're a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
*Strange as it sounds, the site's greatest strength is Thomas. Not only is he charming enough to put the girls at ease, it's super-hot for example when he matter of factly puts a fully clothed girl on her knees to start sucking.
*In addition to being cool, many of the girls are pretty hot and not seen elsewhere.
*I especially love the fantasy episodes, where they act out some silly scenario around the blowjob. Obviously they can't do it all the time, but they do think of some funny ones. |
| Cons: |
*There are no partial clips, and only some of the episodes are available in WMV as well as QuickTime.
*Site design is a little basic: it can be hard to find a specific girl.
*Thomas's physical condition and endowment leave something to be desired.
*The name change issue, as has been remarked on elsewhere, is indeed irritating.
*I'd prefer he stay away from the gadgets - that "Spermcam" is pretty silly. |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line is this is one of the great porn sites. As a one-man shop, it's quirky and clunky, but I'm hesitant to recommend a slicker operation. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- serves my No1 fetish perfectly: all girls swallow
- before they swallow, there's some nice cumplay
- nice variations on the swallow theme: sometimes they take cum directly in their mouths, sometimes they lick it off their fingers, sometimes they drink it out of a shotglass, or get fed spoonfulls of cum after a facial
- very cute, natural girls, many of whom you won't find anywhere else
- girls are treated fery friendly
- humurous tone of the dialogues
- excellent video quality |
| Cons: |
- most scenes are cut into 3 clips. I really prefer to be able to download full clips - this is possible with the new movies (starting February 2007)
- girls should get naked earlier - they mostly undress only in the last quarter of the movie
- the fuck scenes suffer from the POV perspective, here an additional cameraman could improve the videos
- very heavy focus on blowjobs and swallows - my biggest pro could of course also be seen as a very one sided pornsite with repetitive content |
| Bottom Line: |
Amateur Allure was actually my very first pornsite I subscribed to (5 yrs ago). I've been back every year since then, mostly for one or two months. I also checked out many other blowjobs sites, and Amateur Allure is clearly my favourite.
Highly Recommended if you're into blowjobs and swallows.
On the other hand: if blowjobs and swallos are just something you enjoy on the side, then this site is probably not for you, because you won't get much more. The fuck scenes are short and the whole thing is VERY HEAVILY oriented towards the BJ lover.
The site has improved considerably in the last years, video quality is getting better and better, scenes can now be downloaded in one big clip, and you can now chose between Quicktime and Mediaplayer.
Suggestions for future improvements:
- more focus on the body of the girls
- girls naked after the first few minutes
- occasional fuck scenes filmed by cameraman
- more two on one scenes
- scenes with two men would be nice (this is missing completely) |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of horny girl next door types. Many not seen elsewhere.
Very similar to Rodney Moore in style.
Regular updates and interesting and unusually personal Blog.
Recent upgrade in quality of videos - Windows Media Files now supported although quality is similar to the Mov files. Full movie files are also now supported, where before you could only get small clips.
The download times are very fast. |
| Cons: |
The videos are done with an annoying fisheye type lens.
Video quality could use further improvement.
Photos are below average quality (By todays standards) |
| Bottom Line: |
Not bad. One of the better amateur sites out there for videos of never before seen girl next door types. The score would improve considerably if Thomas were to ditch the fisheye lens and provide HD quality full video files of current and past models.
See Simons Scans for an example of how to do this. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Visually of a high quality. If you wish to see it, are looking at it, then it is and clearly. The images are clean and in focus, not blurry, amber and god knows what. SInce what is looked at can actually be seen, maybe this isn't porn at all. |
| Cons: |
-photo could be really, really good, but are halfass.
-once a week uploads. Sounds like one a year memberships.
-suffers from the same old same old that comes with such a niche focus. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really liked the clarity of the images both photographic and video, but that doesn't same the site from the sameness of itself and the once a week update. A nice site to join and then leave after a month. Don't worry, there are no surprise here, so you won't miss things if you aren't a member for a while. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very nice, the models are sexy and erotic. Acts aren't brutals. It' a real pleasure to see this beautiful girls in action. |
| Cons: |
The quality of video isn't all times very good. |
| Bottom Line: |
Good site, with very nice and sexy girls, a good site with respect of woman and not vulgar. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very pretty women. Actually, VERY pretty women.
I love the cum swallowing angle. I find that really sexy and erotic.
Great improvement adding .wmv as a video selection.
The second go around is really good. |
| Cons: |
The sequences are, in my mind, often overly long and dull. He usually gets around to two cum shots but it takes too long for the first one.
Also, the girls don't always get totally naked or, even if they do, you don't see a whole lot very often. The action is always around the blow job and not enough around the girl. Let's face it, guys like to see naked girls. Also, some are well known but Thomas changes their names so you can't find them elsewhere. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an okay site. It's a bit pricey. The cum swallowing is good and the girls are pretty, but if you want naked ladies with hot action, there are other better options. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Nice selection of fresh faces
Some gorgeous women on this site
Clean simple layout
Video quality is very high
Large amount of vids
regular updates |
| Cons: |
Only Quicktime format for vids
No Screencaps
Sex is very formula based at times
Edited scenes ruins some of the scenes
POV mostly, and Oral mostly
Videos are filmed using Widescreen HiDef cameras, which makes the video look bad/streched on some displays
Lack of variety in the sex and style |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good site, and the models he gets are hands down some of the most beautiful ones to grace an amateur site. Unfortunately though his sexual skills and ideas are pretty dull... everything for the most part is filmed to hide his face, so it's either POV shots or from the side angles, and heavily edited, so allot of times it cuts away from the action very quickly. If you like oral mostly then you'll love this site. The video format is annoying, and the lack of options or screen caps usually means you have to download and hope for the best, which is annoying for people on slower connections. If he'd hire male actors or get a cameraman to help out, then things might get really good... |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This was founded by a guy named Thomas who hit the jackpot and has been living the life of Reilly here as a millionaire porn impressario. I admire and envy him like no other.
The site is beautiful. He is one of the few in the country who somehow finds a new, gorgeous amateur girl.. almost every week for the last three years(~!). The site is worth it's weight in gold for all the new talent on display.
Also, no DRM, so download it all and keep it forever. |
| Cons: |
1) As usual, the older videos are lower resuloution.
2) He also uses a fish-eye camera lense for his POV which distorts the video. It can be irksome.
3)The videos are in Quicktime, because apparently he's an Apple Mac-nut. It's no biggie, but I don't prefer it. He also won't post whole scenes - they usually come in 3 parts.
4) Thomas seems OK, but you'd better learn to like the sound of his voice.
5) This is a great Oral/POV site. Some girls don't even get naked. Don't expect more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't know why TheBestPorn doesn't like this site. The guy is kind of a goof, but he doesn't pull any punches. Ameteur Allure delivers exactly what the intro promises with 200+ scenes and unlike a thousand other sites, has dozens of fantastic, stunning, American girls who do this site and then are never seen again.
Their images and horny deeds will burn themselves into the back of your mind forever.
It's worth it at twice the price. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (5) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Amateur Allure Activity - Amateur Allure Reviews - Amateur Allure Comments - Amateur Allure News
