| User Reviews (15) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very attractive girls, mostly 18-22.
-Sticks to the niche of pretty girls performing blow jobs with swallowing.
-179 girls with many having more than one scene.
-The latest updates can be downloaded as scenes or whole videos.
-At least one photo set for each video.
-The archive goes back to 1999. |
| Cons: |
-Only 2 download options-Quicktime and WMV, 800x450, 2177kbps for the most recent update. Decent, but no comparison to the better sites on the internet.
-The scenes are extremely repetitious. The girl sucks his cock, there may be vaginal,and the guy comes in her mouth. Then the camera focuses on the cum in her mouth, the girl strips, shows off her body, gives him a handjob, he comes on her fingers, she licks them off-nice, but every scene is identical.
-Only one stunt cock, who also is the only cameraman. Sometimes poorly shot videos as a result. The money shot often focuses on her hair, chin, the wall, etc. In all fairness, I couldn't do better. After all, who can film well while coming in a pretty girl's mouth? There is a real need for a real professional photographer.
-Blabby stunt cock/cameraman.
-Daily download limit. I was locked out at 6.64GB. No DM support.
-Boring photosets. Except for the money shot photos, the photos were either not explicit or were diagonals. Useles |
| Bottom Line: |
In 1999, Thomas felt there was a need on the internet for a site featuring blow jobs with swallowing, performed by pretty barely legal age girls. He delivers what he set out to do.
However, I think his creativity as well as attention to detail ended at that point. Every scene is virtually a clone of each other. The girls, although nice to look at, are very similar. Almost without exception, they are White, the same age, dressed in similar nice clothes, almost identical makeup, earrings, you name it. Almost no variation even on the most unimportant aspects. Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year.
Almost half of the videos are available only in Quicktime. He states on the site that when he started in 1999, Quicktime was superior to WMV. It is time to move on and leave Quicktime in the museum of old porn sites. I found that the WMV videos also could not play on my WD Media Player. It is probably an older version of WMV.
As a result, not one video I downloaded could be played on my video setup. Even the Arcsoft Video Converter that came with the video player could not convert the files to a format it could play.
The site has a great concept, but comes across as a site run by an amateur. The girls should be the amateurs, not the site itself. For a stand alone site without any extras or network, this is far too expensive. You can find a better value elsewhere. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
*gorgeous girls
*fast downloads
*lot of content
*delivers what it promises |
| Cons: |
*poorly archived
*doesn't show the girls naked enough, some girls not at all
*bad camera angles |
| Bottom Line: |
Well worth the one month cost, unfortunately I bought the 3month deal. I loved looking at just about every girl on the site. But, I am a boob man at heart and there were too many gorgeous girls that never showed their boobs. Also, I want to see more of the girls body during the action. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ very attractive women
+ unique visual style, no other site shoots like amateur allure, visually appealing to me at least
+ all updates can be seen in tour
+ Thomas just seems to be a cool dude, unlike "counterparts" at Exploitedteens or exploitedcollegegirls |
| Cons: |
- older videos in quicktime only, I generally don't like quicktime videos
- pictures not in any type of zip or download manager friendly format
- sex in each scene is usually way too short
- daily DL limit appears to be about 8 gb, though do you really need more than 8 gb in one day? |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of my favorite sites out there, one of those that I want ALL content on the site saved after my subscription is over.
(I don't understand those who have recurring monthly subscriptions unless some incentive of a new group of content is available each month)
Good Scenarios, not cheesy or poorly acted, This is POV porn that actually works! The reason I think is not just because of the models that are in the scenes, but also the format in which it is shot. High quality close ups and no quick cutting from angle to angle. To me, this is one of the most "real" sites out there, Thomas doesn't drone on about how great the girls boobs are, or hard his member is, he just appreciates the situation for what it is, a (usually) very hot girl who is there to enjoy the action.
Yes, the sex part is very short compared to most videos on other sites, but here it sort of adds to the atmosphere, you can use your imagination on how long they actually went at it, or what happens in between.
Obviously, the cumshots/swallows will bring a lot of people in, and it is very well done. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ High Quality Videos
+ Videos Available in QT and WMV
+ Nice Photo Sets
+ Clean Design
+ Very attractive "Amatures"
+ Haven't seen MOST of the Girls
+ Young Talent that looks like they just stepped off a college campus.
+ Good Customer Support
+ Cool scene structure and idea
+ Models really seem to enjoy working with Thomas |
| Cons: |
- Website does not support DL Managers
- Photos are not available in Zips
- Daily (24 hour) Download Limit
- Download limit is ONLY 4 GB
- Download limit is NOT apparent when joining site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This website is very good. I really appreciate the quality of the work, the fresh looking models and the overall quality of the website.
This is not my typical demographic, usually preferring much more "Hardcore" action. (MeatMembers, Platinum X, BrainPass, JM Productions). That being said, I really like what this offers.
This website would have score at least TEN POINTS higher without the download limits. They should remove the limit and/or reduce the price. With today's speeds, you can rip through 4GB in an hour. If they were to have a limit, it should be much higher. |
| Respond: |
6 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent video quality - The best I've ever seen.
Rock solid update schedule.
Beautiful girls.
Every scene has at least one full cum swallow |
| Cons: |
Maybe 30% of the girls are real amateurs. Big Con.
Almost every scene is almost exactly the same.
Doesn't deep throat the girls enough but it's not a deep throat site so it's not his fault. I just personally wish he would deep throat them more. :-) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been around for a long time. Probably sometime in the late 90's. So, he's gotta be doing something right. AmateurAllure and BrokeAmateurs are my favorite sites. AA has been one of my favorites for years. BA is pretty new I think.
Anyway, the girls on AA are so beautiful. Granted, maybe 30% of them are true amateurs. Generally that would be a HUGE turnoff to me but they're so pretty that I give AA a pass on it.
Here's something I've noticed. I've seen girls on AA who I was able to tell have been on other porn sites but he makes them look so good that it's really hard to tell. I don't know if it's his make-up person or how they all dress very classy but I think it's pretty cool that he can take a girl who's done a ton of porn and make her appear so great that it's hard to tell.
I like the way he gives them gentle playfuy slaps on the ass. More erotic than some porn where they just wail on the girl's ass. Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge an of some hard ass-slapping. But, he pulls it off in his own way.
The video quality is the best I've seen. I love it when they are coming off deep throating his cock and you can see their saliva running down the shaft of his cock.
I've seen some other reviews where people have said certain sites are too expensive. AA is a little more than some other sites but I think he deserves the extra. He produces a great product and geesh, you can DL like 150 videos on a one month membership so I don't think any complaints about pricing are appropriate.
If you want quality sites like this one to continue to make a product we enjoy, then be glad to pay for it.
Only real cons that I would mention is the repetitiveness of the scenes but not really that big of a deal for me. Every site has some flaw. If that's the biggest they have then I'm thrilled. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (10) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Amateur Allure Activity - Amateur Allure Reviews - Amateur Allure Comments - Amateur Allure News
