| User Reviews (17) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene. |
| Cons: |
Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns. |
| Bottom Line: |
Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)
In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")
Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.
The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
HeatherMcXxx wrote 1 review (09-13-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ This site features the most incredible attractive girls (around twenties). I don't know how they do it, but all of them cooperate as if they were under a powerful pleasure spell or somekind (must have something to do with that sinister background tune and the bright ring lighting).
Among the latest killer blond models feature: Sophia (spelled as Sofia) Sutra and Samantha Saint. What an enjoyable feast to see them perform in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, be fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Truly Amazing!
+ What else? Great make-up and setting.
+ Large archive: I count 240+ scenes
+ Among these archived scenes, precious gems can be found like Samantha Sin and Courtney (yeah!). |
| Cons: |
- Only one update per week (on friday). No HD - but it's still ok: 800x450 @ 8Mbit/s (but nowadays we'd appreciate HD badly, right?)
- Only two formats: WMV and MOV.
- Old clips are still around - but with ancient formats (320x240) and so on.
- Expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure): news items have not been updated. But hey? as long as the updates are coming, it's fine by me. |
| Bottom Line: |
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Quality also cost energy and resources to make it.
This relatively small site is amazing with regard to original high quality content. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference ;) The girls are hot!!
My advice to the site owner:
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to high res (800x450) to provide better value with minimum effort
+ Upgrade to HD if possible
+ Roll longer POV shots while she is on her back (these are really addictive scenes to enjoy!)
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallure a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base. European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of cute girls, currently the site has roughly 180 different girls on it.
-Lots of archived content. Although most girls only do one set, there are a fair number that do 2, 3 or lots of sets. I'd put the number of actual sets in the 350ish range.
-Almost all sets have a pic set that accompanies it, except for the really old sets, and recently they have added a option to download the picset as a zip file.
-All vids are shot POV style, which I personally love. I know it's not some peoples cup of tea, but I'm counting it as a pro.
-All girls swallow, it's kind of the whole reason the site was created in the first place.
-Most videos available in WMV, MOV and the newest ones are available as a download for your iphone. Also I like that for all the newer videos you can either download the whole thing, or just the end with the cumshot and swallowing.
-No DRM, need I say more?
-All exclusive content. No rehashed scenes here. |
| Cons: |
-It's been said before, the site has a formula. Talk, Suck, Fuck, Suck, Swallow, Strip, HJ/BJ, Lick off fingers. It's rarely deviated from, but there are some that are different.
-The director (Thomas) uses these weird ring style lights to bring out the girl's eyes. It's kinda neat the first time you see it, but it gets old... fast.
-Being how I like POV, it really annoys me that the site breaks POV for the sex scenes and some of the BJ scenes.
-Spermcam, luckily they don't do it as often anymore, but they will cum in a girl's mouth, then get a super closeup of the sperm.
-4GB cap per day. I'm ok with a DL cap, but seeing as how the newer vids are about 500 MBs, that seems restrictive.
-Older videos are only available in Quicktime, which is a format I dislike.
-Internally the site is harder to navigate than if you aren't a member, seems weird to me. It's not hard to navigate, just not as easy as it is if you aren't a member. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second time being a member of this site. I went back because I was offer a 50% discount. Not that I wouldn't have gone back eventually on my own, but I'm a sucker for a good deal.
The guy who run's the site (Thomas) came up with the idea that girls swallowing is awesome and I agree.
For a long time I avoided the site because of the Quicktime file format, but after added support for WMV files I quickly joined. Personally I love the site, the content is great, I have some minor gripes but for the most part I really enjoy the content.
Side note is that for many years Thomas was the only person behind the camera, recently it has switched and a new guy (Ray) has started filming about half the scenes.
Bottom line is I love this site. I will end up coming back again and again. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (13) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Amateur Allure Activity - Amateur Allure Reviews - Amateur Allure Comments - Amateur Allure News
