| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- still only 16 videos and none of them have the full video download option. Get ready to take down 7-16 1 minute clips and them merge them all together. The video quality is around 640x480 and going down in the older scenes.
- there are screencaps for almost every scene as well as high-res photos at 533px × 800px and 720px × 480px. The lack of a zipped archive made this very frustrating. the best way to get the images being via firefox Downloadthemall and selecting download links on page.
- a few very cute models such as Hillary Scott before she got all that work done on her (she actually looks adorable) hailey page and a few more.
- pretty rough anal videos.
- access to the whole meat members network and this site is very well integrated allowing for searches within the network from the site's main page. |
| Cons: |
- site hasn't been updated since 06/07/2006. I don't suspect anymore updates will be added.
- video quality is okay but could be much better.
- server speed could be improved AKA slow downloads for me and the streaming, when it worked, was slow as hell.
- no search option within the site itself. Not that many user friendly features. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is worth it if you're really crazy about the models and want to see how they looked back in 2005. Otherwise there isn't enough here to keep you busy for more than an hour.
The action is good, the photos very nice and the models hot, but the fact that you have to take down clips and then merge them. The lack of zipped archives and the slowness of the servers, just makes you want to yell at the screen. Which is the opposite of what porn is supposed to do :)
I enjoyed the site as part of the whole network but I would recommend against it on it's own. There simply isn't enough here to entertain one. Taken as a whole the network might be interesting and I have a review on it as well, much higher score than this site...
The only reason this site get's more than the minimum is the good quality images and the models, which were very cute.
It's a shame since a little more work could have taken this site into the top ten of it's category easily. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|