Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit ALS Angels

Visit Site
ALS Angels Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Nude Photography

ALS Scan, Inc
2 Sites Listed
Partner:   None

Monthly: $24.95 (recurs at $19.95/mo.)
Multi-Mo: $34.95 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $44.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all ALS Angels Site Facts at TBP.

82.3
Feedback History  (10)

Active Reviews 3
Newbie Reviews 0
Expired Reviews 0
Ratings 2
Comments 5
Review by TheBestPorn:

80.4
TBP Review

Date: 11-28-04

Type: Official

Spencer
+  Cheaper than the sister site.
+  Content looks very good.
-  Content rotates out after a month or two.
-  They need a new design.

User Reviews (3)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
80
MargulisAZ (Disabled) 03-05-08  11:41am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Gorgeous girls.
Great video quality.
Easy site navigation.
Exclusive content.
Fisting and other extreme content.
Large amount of content.
No more content rotation.
Cons: Updates aren't as regular as Alsscan, only 2 movies per week (Tuesday and Thursday) and a pic set here and there.
Not as much content as Alsscan.
No specific director's blog. Alsscan's director's blog talks about Alsangels updates.
New models not added as often as other sites.
A single model's content is released over a very slow period of time.
Bottom Line: This site is basically Alsscan Jr. in a way, although the emphasis is supposed to be that these ladies are a tad bit thicker, or have bigger boobs. It seems like they don't always separate the models precisely due to this criteria, but for the most part they do.

Simply put, if you like Alsscan and have never joined Alsangels, you should definitely give it a shot. But if you're trying to choose between the two I would suggest Alsscan, as it has much more content and more regular updates. Only 2 new videos per week with Alsangels, and I find that disappointing since some of the updates are just remasters of old content. Since I've been a member off and on with both sites for years, it is common to see movies I already have on my hard drive released as "remastered", when I would rather see new material altogether. On Alsscan it works well, but since updates are just 2 per week with Angels, it can lead to infrequent updates of interest. However, someone brand new will not have that problem, so it's all positive in that situation.

Model quality is excellent and all content is exclusive. You will not see Alsscan content on Alsangels or Angels on Als. Since they stopped rotating content there is a decent amount of videos built up, but it still pales in comparison to Als. All pic sets are available as well.

Content is the same as Alsscan, with solo models and some lesbian action. Lots of fisting and extreme insertions. Also, Alsangels is cheaper than Scan by a bit.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Active
89
exotics4me (295) 06-17-07  05:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Most of the videos are 720x540, the older ones are being remastered if they are lower.
- Content is 100% exclusive
- As of right now, in the video section there are 3 full very high production DVDs, besides the video of clips. The DVDs each focus on one starlet, with masturbation and g/g clips. Also are sold on ALS DVD site for upwards of $25 a piece
- ALS has a micro-thong that most of the women wear in at least one set that looks very nice
- Only the very best of models on here
Cons: - I guess the rotating content could be a con
- The video section looks small, 36 video clips plus 3 full DVDs (8 chapters each), on the other hand, I liked each video clip enough that I have yet to delete any of them.
Bottom Line: I had never heard of ALS Angels, but had heard of ALS Scans. I had always heard of the rotating content, which changes every month or every two months. The thing is, I happened to get in on the content rotation in the right 4-8 weeks. As the 3 DVDs are of Breanne (really pretty), Sandra Shine and Eve Angel. Those 3 alone equal 24 clips that range from 12-25 minutes each. Then there are 36 other clips, a few more of them are of Eve Angel, another of Sandra as well. The rest are almost all major Euro stars, Angelina Crowe, Britney Austin, no skip over clips for me.

Pictures, this can be a little frustrating. The zips are divided into 3 sections 1-30, 31-60, so you have to download 3 separate zips.

I guess the hardest part about reviewing this site is that I have been a member for a little over a month, but the rotating content hasn't changed yet, so I can't guarantee if you go there, say next week, that this same content will be available. Having said that, I still have to think that with the overwhelming quality of pictures and videos, and the impressive list of models, there would be something for everyone.

On those DVDs, each one is cut into 8 chapters, on ALS DVD site $20 at least per DVD. The free ones that come with this site are a lower quality, 1MB+ 720x540, yeah, they consider that a lower quality, same exact clips as the DVDs which go up to 5MB HD. I've really enjoyed it, when the rotation hits, I will post a comment to update what is new. Recommended!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
Robare (6) 04-10-07  04:41pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Photos: low res: 1600x1000 900x1400 High res: 3000x2000 3500x2300 1900x2700 2200x3300
Individual photo sets generally range from 80 to 100 pictures.
Presently 74 models in 358 photo sets.
Videos: DIVX @ 320x240 in full or in clips
Windows Media @ 640x480 w/newer at 720x540
Presently 96 videos on site: new release, bonus DVD, and directors choice.
Videos typically range from 12 to 30 minutes.
Updates of at least 2 videos and 1 photoshoot/wk.
No download limit and no DRM.
Cons: Front members page is a bit of a bandwidth hog.
358 thumbs on that page requires approximately 8MB to download.
Bottom Line: I was a little perplexed why the owners of ALSScan put up a similar site such as ALSAngels. But, after going through the content, I've found some distinguishing factors. It's the models. Yes, (as with ALSScan) the women are lovely and obviously enjoy themselves. And, yes, there are no pubes, artificially augmented breasts, penises or stretch marks. And, yes, there are, toys, fisting, fingers, tongues, smiles, a little peeing, and orgasms in a variety of indoor and outdoor scenes, all served up in original content. But, the more voluptuous models with whom the staff at ALS have worked will appear on ALSAngels. And, by voluptuous, I don't mean rubenesque. Think of women like Sandra Shine and Eve Angel, instead.
Judging by the thumbs of the photoshoots, you might think there's almost no girl-girl on the site. But, approximately 20% of the videos feature girl-on-girl or girl-assisting-girl interactions. And they do it better than any site who's initials appear on the compass rose.
Few of the women who've appeared on the ALSScan site appear ALSAngels. And, after browsing both sites, I've yet to find any duplicated content. Given the production values of excellent clarity, lighting, framing, volume levels, no banners or watermarks in the videos, and no spam or pop-ups on the website, ALSAngels presents their product with the same concern for quality of the viewing experience as demonstrated on the ALSScan website, but with a slightly different focus (no pun intended...).
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (5)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

JBDICK (19) 05-06-08  03:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)

Beautiful Girls But Lack of Variety in Scenes

There is no denying the girls at ALSANGELS.COM & sister site ALSSCANS.COM are perfect...and quality and quantity of their exclusive content is huge, unique to them and they have managed to be at the top for the best part of 10 years...
Well Done...and without changing the layout of their sites.

Nice introduction of 2 free sites alsbikinis and heartbreaker but the one thing that bothers me about their format is why do most of the shoots, especially the video, never include the build up...where are the shots of the girls (perfect as they are) walking around with beautiful outfits on, doing the sexy thing and stripping down...teasing us...we know they can do this...i've seen the same girls elsewhere but with ALS you just know they would give you the benchmark that all sites like givemepink and clubsandy would like to meet...

instead we are straight into the usual selection of toys or other models fist lubed up and that's it, start the camera, open and cough...very clinical...

this I see is a limitation of ALS sites. It is not a downfall, it's my preference with Girls this beautiful I want to enjoy the pleasure of seeing their beautiful bodies move, dressed in tight lycra etc before we are given the gynaecological tour, which is still wanted but it's like at Xmas...nobody wants to find their presents under the tree without the appealing wrapping to invite us to get excited...the most exciting part is not knowing what's under the wrapping. Do the same for these girls

Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

williamj (7) 03-28-08  11:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)

If you liked ALS...

If you liked ALS you really need to check out ALS Angels. The girls are more curvy but their all still shaved. Photos sets are a bit more organized and the videos focus more on actual masturbation than just filming photo shots. So if you liked the XXX hard core edge that ALS offered you'll be satisfied with ALS Angels.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

PinkPanther (30) 02-08-08  07:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (1)

Andie Valentino Coming 2/22/08

Alex has been posting speak peek photos of the sets that he shot of Andie Valentino just this weekat ALS Scan. They are absolutely phenomenal. In my opinion Andie Valentino is one of the most ravishing, beautiful women to ever have taken off her clothes for the camera - just an awesome body with enough unique-ness facially to make me want to see more and more and more of her.

I hated - no, I detested - what Twisty's did to Andie's photosets. They must have thought she was the homeliest woman alive to have given her the blurry-face kabuki treatment they did. Alex's pics of Andie are the antidote to that horrendous crap. I can't WAIT to see the full sets posted at ALS Angels (the big-boob sister site of ALS Scan).

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

PattySands (0) 07-31-07  09:32am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Perfect

These girls are simply perfect!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Robare (6) 07-29-07  10:05pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)

New Policy and video offering

It's come to pass that ALSAngels has started following in the foot steps of it's sister site, ALSScan, in two important aspects. The dreaded video rotation policy has been retired. :) At present, the videos available on the site date back to the 20th. of February this year. Plus, they've released a bonus DVD set.
The second aspect, also very welcome, is the start of releasing HD videos. As with their sister site, the videos come in three variants: 1280x720 MP4, 1280x720 DIVX, and 852x480 DIVX. While the production schedule is slower than than that of ALSScan, they're still managing to keep up with their 2-3 videos and a photoset/week schedule. I can understand why, though, as the standards to be met for a model to appear on this site means that there are significantly fewer models available.
Also, I'm pleased to be able to report that that quality of the HD videos is up there with the best offered on the net at this point. For instance, I took a look at the 1280x720 videos offered at InFocusGirls and those videos look positively grainy compared to those at ALSAngels and ALSScan.
I've exchanged a few emails with the webmaster concerning the changes and have been told that the new work is being shot in HD but they will continue to release videos they've already done in the 640x480 and 720x540 formats. It's gratifying to see them taking the lead both in quality and heeding customer suggestions. I look forward to many good things to come from them as time progresses.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll ALS Angels Activity - ALS Angels Reviews - ALS Angels Comments - ALS Angels News

Visit ALS Angels

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Sarah (4)

Date News Title Replies News By
07-09-07 ALS is no longer rotating off videos! 1 Sarah

View All : Site News (1)


      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. ALS Scan (18) 87.5 89.1
2. ALS Angels (3) 82.3 80.4

RSS Feed : ALS Scan, Inc Activity

View All: Company Sites (2)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.