PornUsers Newsletter!   Exclusive Discounts, News & Prizes  
E-mail:
Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit All Over 30

Visit Site

All Over 30

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Mature Women
2. Soft Content
3. MILF Porn

eTech Marketing Inc.
1 Site Listed
Partner: Crazies Cash

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $64.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all All Over 30 Site Facts at TBP.

71.3
Feedback History  (45)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 24
Review by TheBestPorn:

87.0
TBP Review

Date: 01-31-12

Type: 2.0

Spencer
+  Nice, large collection.
+  Multiple daily updates.
-  Look and feel of the site could be better.
-  Older quality isn't as good.

User Reviews (18)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 18 Next Page >

Active
82
pat362 (235) 05-29-11  09:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They have nearly 530 models to choose from.
-They have over 2150 videos.
-They have over 5900 phtosets.
-Movies can be streamed online with flash player
-All the videos can be downloaded as a complete file in either WMV or MPG. They also have some videos.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a complete file. They all offer pics 1024 and 1536 format and some of the newer ones also come in 2400.
-They have an active forum for their members.
-They have a calender showing the updates for the next 7 days.
-Update are a mixture of 5 photosets/videos.
-Content is all dated.
Cons: -The majority of photosets and videos are mostly softcore to midore so very little hardcore to choose from.
-There are nearly 3 times more photosets than videos.
-The majority of models are 41 or less so you might want to look elsewhere if you were looking for older ladies.
-They don't update with the models photoset and corresponding video at the same time.
Bottom Line: -This is an impressive site with a large library of content but I can't help but feel disapointed that there is so little hardcore to be found inside and also that there are so few videos. I may have gottent my hopes up thinking that there would be much more than there really is.

-The site should update with a photoset and the video that goes with it instead of doing it over a certain period of time.

-This is a hard site to recommend because I'm not sure exactly who they are trying to cater to. It's a mature site but since most of the models are in their 30's then that might not be what some of us consider very mature. There is hardcore but again not that much so that might not be enough to satisfy those people. There weren't too many glamour videos or photosets so again that cuts another group. I guess if you want to see women from the age of 30 to 41 do solo shoots and some fetich and hardscore then this might be the site for you. I suspect most others will be a disapointed like me.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Active
50
spacenick (5) 08-09-10  09:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I found several of my favorite models on this site and thought maybe this site has sets of them I don't have and so I decided to sign up.

Yes, it’s a website on the Internet that features “Older” Women – the specifics are not really shown on the “Not a member! Come on and see our goods for sale” intro pages.. until I became a member.

Pros: Yes it has mature women, it has many of them, various physical attributes and so forth.

Videos are in WMV and MPEG formats (A Major Plus, this site is download manager friendly - becoming a norm) my settings are 1 video at a time. The newer vids are HD WMV, but if you want to make a DVD collection, the MPEG is easier to work with. HD-WMV is becoming a website Standard now. No DRM.

Zip files are good,on top of the page, there is the resolution, its all packed up and ready to download. Great but again, a "all-in-one" zip file link is becoming a website Standard.

Website layout is fairly easy to use. I can click and navigate around easy.
Cons: I just want to say one thing to the camera-man “Dude! STFU!”

[Camera-woman's voice is okay, no prob there]

Comparing this site to other sites, the other sites typically film the action and that’s that. On this site, basically the some of the videos begin with the cameraman’s dorky voiced commentary and continues throughout the whole video. Gawd man, STFU already. Amatuer, not the content but the people who work this site.

Interviewing and doing some sort of “get to know your” naked lady video is okay now and then, but come on, there’s is a lot of them. Obviously, a porn site is suppose to be that, a porn site with action and if its not part some lonely housewife and mailman theme, then forget it, if I wanted to listen to some sort of psychological profile, interpersonal communication skills and emotional constructs relating to sex, I’d go to an AA meeting. Geesh. I mean seriously.

Less talk more action.
Bottom Line: Good video downloads (the newer vids are more like 320p), Yep, a good sized HD logo stamped on the vids gives me assurance that the vid is shot in alleged "HD" ... good zip file downloads and its download manager friendly (remember I download 1 video at a time), it’s great.
But these things are becoming porn site standards.
It is how the content is being handled, photos that seem to be shot by a man with unsteady hands and a cameraman that will not be quiet, themes that include rubber-cowhide-leather-wetsuit crap that’s supposed to be kinky. But there are some regular “porn” vidoes and photos worth downloading, its hit and miss.

I did find different photo/video sets of the models, I was interested in, that is a plus but other than that, if these models weren’t on this site, I would’ve passed.. Knowing what I know now.

Rebilling, Make sure you cancel or use a temporary prepaid credit card or "Craziescash" will continue to try rebill you.
You'll see your statement "transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. "ahh, two weeks later" transaction approved!" So then, its like Great, I just paid for another month for videos about the camera man that talks and interupts, gives advice to naked people. Woo Hoo, just what I wanted for a Christmas porno present.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
95
mr smut (40) 11-30-09  04:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
77
Capn (27) 09-06-09  08:28am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (10 Replies)

Expired
90
bacardiancoke (22) 08-05-09  06:07am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
87
GCode (99) 04-01-09  01:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies)

Expired
85
messmer (123) 10-07-08  02:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
95
TheRizzo (23) 06-16-08  03:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (36), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
88
exotics4me (431) 03-23-08  09:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
78
mr3633 (9) 03-15-08  01:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 18 Next Page >
User Comments (24)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-20 of 24 < Previous Page - Next Page >

mr3633 (9) 04-09-10  11:41am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (1)

Any current PU members currently have a membership to All over 30?

Hello Everyone,
I'm just curious if there are any PU members who currently have membership to this site. I'm trying to understand how many (approximate) videos exist for the "Ladies in Action" category. This category is the B/G hardcore category and the section I am most interested in.

Thanks for your help.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Capn (27) 02-20-10  05:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)

Any Change?

Am I right in thinking that on the whole the outfit selections are largely unchanged?

I am always hoping for more appropriate mature attire:
Formal, smart casual , real uniform etc which I do appreciate there is as well, but I still see a few tacky play uniforms featured in recent update section.

Does that impression hold true in the members area?

What sort of ratio are we looking at?

Thanks.

Cap'n. :0)

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Auxilia (4) 01-02-10  12:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)

No more daft outfits

I agree with Cap'n, above. Ill fitting 'French Maid' outfits HAVE HAD THEIR DAY!

My favourite content on this site were in no particular order:

9 to 5 ladies (office and sports wear)
elegant ladies (evening wear)
a category which used 'homely' setting and casual everyday - can't remember what it was called

The lacey ladies category was I thought a bit daft. I also thought their M/F and much of their F/F material was a bit poor.

Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply

Capn (27) 12-01-09  03:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)

Playing to the strengths of the niche?

..I honestly don't think so.

I have been a member on and off for a few times, but could never put my finger on why I was always dissatisfied.

I think this is it.

A mature site should concentrate more on the elegance of a mature woman....not dress her in glam clothes that make her look a bit cheap and sad. :0/

...or make her perform like a mainstream porn star.

Have her dressed prim & proper either formal or casual...
It gives the impression she wouldn't dream of stripping naked for the camera. It then adds a lot to the eroticism when she does. ;0)

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Chipster (3) 10-08-09  11:53am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (3)

Saw TORI on a TGP, had to rejoin !

I had let my subscription to AO30 lapse, in order for them to build up new sets. Saw TORI on a TGP, had to rejoin immediately after feasting my eyes on those samples ! Happy to see many new models on the site. Also my previous favorite YOLANDA has some girl-girl sets added since I left. Waist long hair, full figure !

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

messmer (123) 07-14-09  09:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (1)

Site became noticeably better - at first glance!

I was going to edit my previous review and up the score by ten points but because too much time had lapsed I would have had to write a new one so I'll praise AO30 through this comment:

This site has gone through a very positive change. Since May, most videos are now available in HD 1280x720, 3751 kbps format, there has also been a vast improvement when it comes to the picture sets, they are now being offered at 1600x2400 and many of the older sets are being remastered to the new, larger size. Hooray, it's an unofficial 95 for AO30 now.

Oh, yeah, almost forgot: all of the new interviews I have watched so far were conducted by WOMEN while all the scenes (so far) were devoid of embarrassing comments by male videographers, that's got to count for another couple of points. If I don't watch myself I'll give this site a hundred yet! :-)

P.S. July 16: I should clarify one statement a bit: Since May all NEW models are being shot in HD, in today's large update there was not a single HD quality video to be found because this site still updates from mostly older stock that was shot before May. They do make a good effort to convert picture sets and videos but, in my estimation, it will be a while before all the daily updates contain HD.

P.P.S. July 30: There has not been a single update in HD videos this week. I am hugely disappointed because the presence of HD (finally!!!) was my one and only incentive for re-subscribing. I feel I have been scammed and take back anything complimentary I have written in this remark. Picture sets are still mostly unimaginative and boring with the ladies constantly forgetting to bring enough underwear for a shoot.

P.P.P.S August 12: The end of a disappointing month. I like the site and wish it well but will give it some time to really improve before I will re-subscribe.

My intial gushing seems to have been premature because there are a lot of videos offered to this day that are of inferior quality (compared to HD) and as I stated above their photographers have to get a bit more inventive, a lot more inventive. One good sign, one of their photographers went shopping this weekend for some old-fashioned lingerie. We'll see if it will show up in the sets in three months, or so.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

GCode (99) 03-24-09  08:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)

Demand for quick updates affects quality plus niche

Hello,
I joined this site earlier in the month after scanning good reviews from others here. However, when it comes to the quanity of the site which is great, the quality of the models tends to be affected imho. But, I do know that the niche of real mature models gets in the way of finding a lot of models because of reasons I'll get in to some other time. Therefore, I have to say that the models here that I find attractive are far in between the lousy ones. I'm thinking the demand for new models and quick updates is the culprit. Don't get me wrong, this site does A LOT of things right and is near perfect in all those aspects. Also, I understand quick updates is very attractive to customers. I just have to say, a lot of these models look like they weren't even attractive in their teens, 20's, or even now. I feel I have an okay eye for natural, mature women and I know women can blossom even more as time goes on but c'mon...Does anyone else agree or what. I think updating less here would get more quality models, which I think this place needs.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

messmer (123) 03-18-09  11:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (1)

How good are the videos now?

I was a member of this site some time ago and while I liked it in general for catering to the fans of mature women their videos were horribly inadequate. How are they nowadays? Anything approaching HD quality yet?

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

TheRizzo (23) 01-03-09  09:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (36), NO (0)

Yummy Lilli

Have you guys seen Lilli on All Over 30 yet? My oh my. 48 years old with great big tits. These are the kinda girls I want them to add more of down the road.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

mr smut (40) 11-20-08  02:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)

As of today 300 models are featured on AO30

The longer I stay the more I like this site and as of today there are 300 different models featured on AO30. That's a variety of gorgeous girls I've never seen before - speaking about the ratio of quantity vs. quality - on a mature site :-)

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 11-20 of 24 < Previous Page - Next Page >

RSS FeedsAll All Over 30 Activity - All Over 30 Reviews - All Over 30 Comments - All Over 30 News

Visit All Over 30

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  Crazies (2)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. All Over 30 (2) 71.3 87.0

RSS Feed : eTech Marketing Inc. Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.44 seconds.