Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit abbywinters

Visit Site
abbywinters Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Lesbian Sex
3. Nude Photography

G Media
1 Site Listed
Partner: None

Monthly: $21.25 (recurs at $18.25/mo.)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $25.00.


View all abbywinters Site Facts at TBP.

83.3
Feedback History  (112)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 32
Active Ratings 1
Newbie Ratings 6
Comments 42
Review by TheBestPorn:

95.0
TBP Review

Date: 09-01-09

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Large Collection of Exclusive Amateur Content.
+  Daily Updates.
-  Different Membership Levels & Prices (Can Get Pricey).
-  Video Quality Could Still Be Better.

User Reviews (60)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 11-20 of 60 < Previous Page - Next Page >

Newbie
100*
DonD (0) 01-28-09  05:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: I've been a member of this site for most of the last 3 years. I'm into natural, happy, real, bubbly, beautiful young women (instead of jaded professionals). I like High Quality stills and video, where lots of attention has been paid to aesthetics. I like videos where the women are real people and you get a sense of their personality (as compared to sites where the models either don't speak or their dialogue is decidedly scripted or forced). I like to visit a site that makes me feel that sexuality is a positive and happy experience (rather than depressing and degrading). A site where the staff are involved and upbeat and take great care in their work and in the overall "tone" and presentation of the site. I enjoy a site that maintains an ethical approach and treats models and users with consideration.

In short, I like Abbywinters. I've never found anything that suits my tastes more. I can recommend it to users who like any of the things that I do. There's simply nothing like it.
Cons: None
(Of course, such things are subjective. Abbywinters, for me, is perfect).

If you're just into degrading hardcore or boy-girl stuff and/or the pornstar aesthetic, Abbywinters is probably not for you.
Bottom Line: If you like beautiful happy young women and their personalities, you'll love Abbywinters. Apart from all of the things mentioned above, its a site that really speaks of a great deal of attention to detail and care. There's some other great features worth noting too. They have a vibrant message board where many of the models post, so if you have a favorite you may have the opportunity to exchange posts with them, something I enjoy doing. They also have somewhat of a specialty: every so often they will have a big shoot with a massive group of models (eg. a nude yoga class, nude wrestling, nude hiking etc. Their latest shoot- a nude step aerobics class- featured 19 models! Fun stuff).

I don't like to visit sites where I feel bad for the models, where sex is portrayed as something ugly or dirty or mechanistic (soulless and impersonal). I like a site that is fun and sexy and breezy- that has plenty of harder girl-girl stuff if you're in the mood but also lots of "profile" style videos where you get some sense of the model and their personality.

For me, Abbywinters is spot on. I've tried other places but this is the one for me. I like it so much that I'm writing this review. I'm a fan. Thank you for your time in reading.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
95*
vandijk (0) 11-18-08  07:52am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: models are natural, no silicon, natural figures, the scenes come over as real, orgasm's real. excellent filming. girls come over as innocent, non pro;s, clearly instructing each other as what they like most as how to rub, suck etc...
best girl-girl site i've seen.
Cons: honestly would not know what to not like. as far as i'm concerned no-con's !!
Bottom Line: NATURAL MODELS
HONEST , EAGER SEX
REAL BREAST'S (NO SILICON)
SCENES LOOK NON-STAGED / REAL SEX
MOAN'S / ORGASM'S REAL AND NOT ACTED
EXCELLENT SITE
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
93*
parahelion (3) 06-21-08  10:57am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -A high variety of photos and videos
-Very sensual women (no play acting here)
Both the videos and the photos are high quality, and there's enough of both to keep you busy for a long while. The videography and photography are well done and don't look airbrushed or modified to perfect these gorgeous women. On top of that, the download speeds are quite sufficient (mine peaked at 660 kb/sec).
Cons: The site layout is a series of different directories which can be confusing to navigate around at first.
The videos are all in segments, which is a burden to download entire sequences.
It's relatively expensive, and you have to get the whole subscription package to see everything.
Most of the photos and videos are soft core with kissing, intimacy, or talking (though it's still good quality). There are not a lot of videos (compared to the rest of the site content) with real lesbian sexual activity. Too many of the videos are just talking or goofing around naked.
Bottom Line: AbbyWinters has an impressive collection of solo and lesbian natural women doing their thing. They have a small collection of male-female vids and some fetish vids, so plenty of variety.
The double edged sword here is the high video quality. It's spectacular, but it requires the huge video files to be split into segments, which can be tedious to download. All in all, it's still worth it for the quality.
Bottom line: If you're tired of the mainstream "glamor" porn and a lack of sensuality, this is the place. The women obviously love what they're doing here, and it can be more erotic because of such. There's an entirely natural feeling to all of it--no boob jobs, no mass makeup, no fancy video tricks, and especially no background music! The natural thing also means that a lot of the women do not shave their pubic area, or may only trim it. It's not a big concern for me, but if you like hair down there, this site's for you!
I highly recommend.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Expired
95
visor (7) 03-12-08  10:54am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
80
badandy400 (99) 03-02-08  01:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies) - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
61*
Markus0072 (0) 02-12-08  02:57am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
100*
buckdaddy1 (0) 01-20-08  02:09pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (5)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (7 Replies)

Expired
90*
hondaclf (2) 01-17-08  05:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
94
congestus (Disabled) 01-09-08  03:25pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90
polacrilex (11) 01-02-08  07:31pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 11-20 of 60 < Previous Page - Next Page >
User Comments (42)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 42 Next Page >

dingle (1) 12-04-09  12:33pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

No no no nooo.

Well got my membership today- As i read videos are getting better from the "Dark days" And no no no no nothing has got any better, granted 3 videos in the last 2 months show pink bits- but most of the new updates are the same. (Solo site)

Todays photo set is 145 photos (Anna T) Page 5 there is ONE shot from the side close up showing pubes, & page six 1 shot of full model from the side showing pubes- 145 photos !!!! WTF.

Im finding that the model/s must have been told to keep things clean as they tend to really try to keep lady bits hidden or show a slight bit for a *few mins out of a 20 min video.
*Few mins= 1.30 sec tops close up or long shot.

To be honest some of the shoots and videos are so softcore that they could be aired on britsh Tv- i have seen more muff in a dvd brought from a newsagents top self section (*With a free adult mag)

~This shall be my last hit on my credit card to this site and im so gutted that the laws of austraila have hit this once GREAT SITE...

K time to get slated from webmasters, Oh can my girlfriend do a shoot with you guys? She can talk for hours and im sure she would be willing to show just her pubes for 30 seconds in a video???

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

williamj (9) 11-23-09  07:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

I Love Abby Winters but?

a little more hardocre

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

RagingBuddhist (41) 11-18-09  08:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

It's not just us

These are quotes from another forum I'm on, all from the last couple of weeks.

"the vids are boring - girls just talk and sit down and start masturbating."

"I have to agree with everything that's been said here. The girls aren't as cute as they used to be and the nudity in a lot of sets is minimal. And suggestions for improvement always fell on deaf ears. They won't be getting another membership from me."

"i was a longstanding member awhile back and wish it would return to its roots. "

"here is another example of why AW is getting so bad...they had a recent model rebekah, very cute (doesnt happen that much anymore) and no nudity until last 2 minutes and its not much... what is this sites problem????"

"They seem to have fallen into a rut and lost their creativity."

"they did it again...new vid with Cate a very cute girl (nice to see) and during her vid she just sits on her ass for the whole video...cant really see her really nice body...they really need to understand what people want in the vids (i guess they feel intellectual conversation is what guys want - they have no clue)... have the girl get up and do something interesting (its a video)"

So it's not just us, here on Pornusers, who see that this site is in a serious decline. Please, SueAnn (or whomever might respond to this), tell us what's really going on at AW!

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

GCode (79) 09-05-09  08:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (45), NO (0)

New Discount? And Is It Worth It?

I have never joined this site. The new 2.0 review boasts a huge score at 95. However, I have read comments the past few months about the site going downhill. Also, I don't remember seeing the discount before? As a first time member, what's the verdict on joining this site at this discounted price? Any opinions and comments are welcome.

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Pornbro (8) 09-03-09  03:16am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)

Hot Babes

As a member about 6 months ago, I was really stisfied with. A lot of beautiful girls and lesbian scenes. Real natural Beauties.
Had nothing to complain

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

xxrrtt (1) 08-11-09  11:39am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

MP4 files?

I'm considering joining this site, but I've heard that the high-quality videos are only available as MP4 files. I hate MP4.

Can anyone confirm that this is the case? Are WMV or Divx files available, and are they high quality?

Thank you for any information.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

littlejoe (13) 07-22-09  10:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

what happened to the preview site?

i cant figure out how to see the updates? this new site sucks

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

RagingBuddhist (41) 07-18-09  12:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

What a disappointment

This kind of mirrors dingle's review of the site but, as I just clicked the cancel rebills link and directed Abby's crew to come here to see why I'm not re-upping, I wanted to make it easier for them to see this. It assumes they'll make the effort and I hope they'll respond.

I just watched the lastest video - a 321 meg file, 20:25 running time and, yet again, it was over 16 1/2 minutes of the model talking away before she started to undress. This trend almost has me wondering if AW is heading towrds becoming a non-nude site. Okay.. maybe that's a stretch. But what they're doing now is not something I'd ever knowingly sign up for. The same goes for the picture sets. The matching picture set to the above video was just as bothersome. 236 pictures with the first HINT of nudity at pic #135.

So what's the standard now? Picture sets that are 2/3rd's clothed? Picture and video resolutions that look upscaled - especially the outdoor shots? And who decided that a good porn site should include such yawn inspiring videos such as a girl prattling on about what a lazy day she had?

I never thought I'd have any feeling like this for a porn site, but I have to say I was a bit sad to see this one go down like it did. This used to be one of the few sites I'd actually let rebill. Not this time. Again - what a disappointment.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

turboshaft (22) 06-23-09  03:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (35), NO (0)

Are Abby's Days Numbered?

A recent thread mentioned their company, G Media, offices being raided by police because their porn was illegally explicit. These types of stories seem to rarely have happy endings, as porn and the law do not have a good relationship.

So, does anyone know what's going to happen? If any current members get news or updates from the site about its status, could you please pass it along here or in the above mentioned thread. I have yet to be a member of this site, but it's on my list, and I am steeling myself for the reality that it might not exist in the near future. :(

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

RagingBuddhist (41) 06-18-09  05:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)

Follow up on AW issue and agreement with uscue

I meant to follow up on the issue I had with memory usage while running through AW, but I guess I took their approach and kinda let it slip for a while. It took 'em about a week to get back to me when I emailed 'em about how the memory usage was going through the roof. What I got was a letter blaming Firefox for being a known resource hog, along with a couple of links to all these steps I could take to minimize memory usage. Clear out the cache, delete temp files... all that stuff. Well, that's stuff I do daily, and browsing Abby's is still a pain. About 10 - 15 pages in, the memory usage starts to clog up the works. No other site I run through does that - not even hours long sessions browsing on Flickr . So, just like the problem I had with Matt's Models, I just see it as another site that can't look at what they're doing and admit that maybe they have a problem.

So, yeah, I have to agree with uscue - this site is definitely not what it once was. If it weren't for the fact that I'm grandfathered and can still get the whole site for a decent price, I definitely wouldn't have joined again. And, while we can't know for sure whether or not they're sending people here to shill for the site, they've made it somewhat clear in the past that they ARE a business, so I guess anything's possible.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-10 of 42 Next Page >

RSS FeedsAll abbywinters Activity - abbywinters Reviews - abbywinters Comments - abbywinters News

Visit abbywinters

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  abbywinters (17), SueAnn (7), Too True (0)

Date News Title Replies News By
10-29-09 Special Yoga Girls re-release 0 SueAnn
08-12-09 August Update 0 SueAnn
06-25-09 June Update 0 SueAnn
05-09-07 16-girl yoga shoot 1 abbywinters
01-13-07 Rebuttal to BDickuss' negative comment 1 abbywinters
01-13-07 Congratulations and hello! 0 abbywinters

View All : Site News (1)


      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. abbywinters (2) 83.3 95.0

RSS Feed : G Media Activity

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.