| User Reviews (6) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ genuine real swingers
+ recent videos are of very good quality (not Hollywood and not Private DVDs, but still quite good 1280x720).
+ occasional acting guys as cameraguys is an interesting twist adding reality feeling
+ variety (what about DP scene shot completely in infrared? :-))
+ decent post-processing (especially for amateur clips)
+ active forum
+ calendar of recent and upcoming updates
+ overall excellent job of webmaster |
| Cons: |
- some models look booored while doing it
- older videos are of poor quality
- even not so old videos (720x480) have significant visible interlacing, so ONLY most recent ones are good
- cameraguy work sometimes isn't too good |
| Bottom Line: |
it is a quite a unique site aiming at showing real swingers, and I should admit it's the best such attempt I've seen to date. Formally it consists of a bunch of individual model sites under single umbrella, but essentially done by the same people and very consistent.
These guys and girls look as they're doing it for real (at least most of the time); it's full of conversations which show it's indeed for real, and most of them are having fun. On the other hand, sometimes models have such a boored expression on the face, that it ruins much of reality feeling; fortunately it doesn't happen too often (personally I especially liked Brooke for her "live" face).
Variety is excellent - any kind of group action is here (except for anything MM), up at least to 3+3, with significant amount of anal and DP thrown in, and occasional twists like infrared shot or interracial guy.
Technically recent videos are VERY good (VERY decent 1280x720 at 3Mbit/s), but more earlier ones aren't so good; even 720x480 has interlacing problems which pretty much ruin quality when panning.
Website is excellent too, it has lots of features to make it more enjoyable (like search through all the sub-sites or slideshow); the only thing I found missing is ZIPped picture download.
Bottom line: VERY decent site for lovers of amateur orgy sites with not so amateurish quality; for lovers of this niche it is HIGHLY recommended (it would get even higher rating if not for some boored model faces). |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of content
-Great amateur hardcore action
-New pics a solid 1200 X 800
-Comes with good amateur network
-Nice big screen caps
-New videos in HD ( 1280 X 720)
-Active in forums, with good articles
-A section in which invites you to meet them for sex…
-Attempt to remaster some older videos
-Some good orgasms
-64 dif. girls, and 29 dif. guys make appearances in videos |
| Cons: |
-Old videos only offered in ASF, and RM
-Old videos poor quality/ half of videos on site
-Old videos are small clips
-Updates
-No zip download for pics
-Old pics fairly small
-Very infrequent cam shows
-No DP on Anna
-Not enough Angelique  |
| Bottom Line: |
- Content: Photo Sets 487, Video Clips 436
- I like the little synopsis of the videos near the videos, so I know what to expect. I wish the older videos had longer ones.
-This site is the most hardcore of the network, and second best. There is limited amount of masturbation on this site. The videos usually consist of many guys and or girls. The site is swinger style porn. There are also lots of blowjob videos if your into that, usually with more then one girl. Not as personal as Angelique’s site. There are also lots of fake titted models who are not very glamorous on the site. But definitely worth a look if your into amateur group porn. The Orgies and sex Parties are hot.
O yeah BTW Bruce you do a great job holding your load. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|