| User Reviews (6) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
I'd say the major draw here is the quality of girls, very cute and some absolute stunners. Stasha is one to join the site for especially.
Some videos are hardcore done softly which I really like, kind of like x-art style with erotic soft setting and fly on the wall camera shots with professional quality camera work.
The network sites caters for most tastes, softer solo stuff, lesbian, group of girls naked (one of my favs), hardcore and also kinkier stuff like peeing too, one of the previews of this looked awesome but wasn't available sadly when I was a member.
Some really great photography too here, seems to be getting better.
Nice blog site to keep you interested when not a member which is important I feel. |
| Cons: |
Not too much to moan about but if I had to here it is.
Price could be cheaper for the network $19.99 would be great.
The search and navigation could need some improvement but I've seen worse.
Would be nice to have each girl with a profile page to say what stuff they have done and even non members could view, that would be a good edition, maybe even interviews and backstage stuff, its nice to find more out about them and this site has lots of regular girls exclusive to this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its been a few months since I was a member, I feel a new join is around the corner, maybe for Christmas as their new stuff looks very hot indeed. I haven't checked out the previews for this site for some time and the blog site 18onlygirlsblog.com but must say they really have come along way and I think this site may not get the credit it deserves.
Only sort of went on the site last week after seeing Lets Wake Him Up movie with Adria and Mia and never watched it yet since I downloaded it when I was a member and was well impressed. Very erotic and high class camera work. the site has these 2 ultra cuties Gloria and Stasha who look as though they have stepped right off the catwalk. words can't describe how cute Stasha is. Anyway in-case it may of missed you or gone under your radar I totally recommend this site, it is up there with my top ten sites. Check out the blog beforehand to see if it's the type of material you'd be interested in anyway.
Thumbs up from moi. |
| Respond: |
11 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Videos: Small watermark appears briefly at different times in a video.
Not obtrusive.
-Photos: Small watermark.
-No DRM.
-Videos and photosets have posting date.
-Site has a models list, which is a an alphabetical list/pages of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the number of photosets and videos for each model.
-Very long period before site timeout.
-Can watch videos streaming or download. The streaming option is not very good. You get a small window to watch the video. Much better to download the video and watch it on your PC. Streaming option is OK to watch briefly to see if the video will be of interest. But trying to fast-forward the streaming video does not work well: the video stops playing, and it's hard to get it to resume at the place you want to try next.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Large number of models (320+). |
| Cons: |
-The software for viewing individual photos is clunky. There should be an easier way to view individual photos.
-Navigation is basic. It should be easier to browse through the photosets and videos. The videos and photosets are split into two separate sections, but it should be easier to browse through the site contents.
-The search is basic, and could be improved by being able to search for the title of a photoset or video, or being able to search for a specific
type of content such as type of sex action, etc.
-No model bio or information on the model is offered.
-One size only for each photoset. No choice of low, medium, high quality photosets. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are a number of attractive models at this site. The site theme is young teen girls who are amateurs. These are not girls being naughty, but
attractive young girls who are filmed on camera enjoying their sexuality: by themselves (masturbation), with their female friends (lesbian), less often with a boy. It's good clean enjoyment and fun, not dirty, not abusive, not rough.
-Large number of models (320+). The models are teen or early twenties, white Eastern European girls. Mainly slender, mainly small-breasted.
Number of models at this site: 320
Number of photos per photoset: 40 - 100 photos.
videos:
number: 800+
runtime: 15-20 minutes
size: 200 MB - 1 GB+, depending on which quality you choose.
Format: WMV
Definition/quality: medium, high, HD (the best, highest quality)
Photosets:
number: 1,000+
Photo dimensions: 1000 x 1500 pixels width x height.
Photo size: about 200 KB.
-Update rate:
1 photoset per day, average.
1 video every 2 days, average.
I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying.
The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what
is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of the
much better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are
almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos.
Content appears to be shared between the 18 Only Girls site and the Young Legal Porn site. This is true of photosets and videos. I am looking at a
recent photoset at 18 Only Girls, titled
"Horny_coed_girl_striping_and_toying_her_snatch_1295819441_only_674", with the model named Drew. But even though the photoset is posted at 18 Only
Girls, each photo has a YoungPorn.net watermark.
There seems to be some confusion in naming The Young Legal Porn site: The Young Legal Porn site is called both Young Legal Porn and is also called Young Porn. The site is advertised as Young Legal Porn, but the address bar of the site itself uses YoungPorn instead, and the watermarks on the photosets show YoungPorn.net.
The videos, unlike the photosets, have value. The videos are professionally shot, and are very high quality: Good to excellent lighting, focus, definition, camera-work. There are a large number of videos at this site worth watching, as long as
you are satisfied with a softcore approach to pretty young teens: the sex is solo, or lesbian, or some boy-girl, but it's not hard-edged or abusive. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed |
| Cons: |
-not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.
Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.
Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies. |
| Respond: |
8 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Good amount of content -- if you sign up for the individual site or the network
+ 720p HD video
+ Great photography in the galleries.
+ Beautiful Euro babes
+ Good site navigation |
| Cons: |
- Difficult to search/browse across network sites.
- Only a few of the network sites regularly updating
- Not much variety across the sites -- pretty much the Euro teen theme across the board.
- Expensive. Access to the network is $34.97
- Some updates not indicated on umbrella site (Diesel Access) |
| Bottom Line: |
I've signed up to 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn separately in the past. This time I decided to sign up for full network access. Since PU does not list the umbrella site, Diesel Access, I randomly chose this site for the review.
I've enjoyed these sites but I have to say I was a bit disappointed with my latest subscription. Admittedly, my expectations were high with the price I paid but there were other issues as well. Let's start with the network. Typically, I expect some variation when you join a network. These sites were almost identical in theme and even shared some content. Basically 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are the same site. Then there are a handful of solo model sites. These solo models also appear in the above mentioned sites!
Aside from my issues with the network they could also work on producing more original content with a larger number of girls. I only kept 9 video clips which is small considering the price I paid.
On the positive side there are some truly superb ladies on this site. I typically don't collect pics but I downloaded a bunch of them from this site. The site is easy to navigate and I had no issue with downloads or streaming.
To sum up, I would recommend this site to anyone into the Euro-teen genre. I'd suggest joining either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn but not the network as it's just more of the same. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
Goldfish wrote 1 review (06-16-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (10) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All 18 Only Girls Activity - 18 Only Girls Reviews - 18 Only Girls Comments - 18 Only Girls News
