Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit 18 Eighteen

Visit Site
18 Eighteen Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Young Adults
2. Magazines

The SCORE Group
37 Sites Listed
Partner:   Get Score Cash

Trial: $2.95 (3 days, recurs $19.95/mo.)
Monthly: $19.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, recurring)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $19.95.


View all 18 Eighteen Site Facts at TBP.

77.2
Feedback History  (9)

Active Reviews 4
Newbie Reviews 0
Expired Reviews 0
Ratings 1
Comments 4
Review by TheBestPorn:

84.6
TBP Review

Date: 02-12-07

Type: Follow-Up

Vanessa
+  Good download options for content.
+  Nice quality content.
+  5 weekly updates.
-  No way to browse the photos by category/fetish.
-  Site design and navigation could be improved.

User Reviews (4)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
86
WeeWillyWinky (58) 09-23-07  09:08pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
Cons: - Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
Bottom Line: I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.

Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.

There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.

Elvis and me, we'd be mates.

A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.

I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.

Follow-Up:
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
69
Schnitzel (29) 07-11-07  02:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Exclusive content.
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.
-Mostly pretty models.
-No DRM.
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions.
Cons: -Video quality could be improved.
-Would like to see more updates.
-Content doesn't justify the cost.
-Site design is somewhat scattered.
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive.
Bottom Line: 18 Eighteen looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.

There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.

If you like the youngest porn possible, 18 Eighteen's content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.

Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
68
Douggie (8) 06-14-07  05:08pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: *Exclusive girls
*Trial join
*pretty girls
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with batteries!
HUM
Cons: Hate to be negative but......

*Very Very limited video
*Formats to finding videos are crappy
*Very limited updates
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).
* There boasts about how often they update is B.S.
Bottom Line: My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.

I belong to thefemaleorgasm.com. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.

Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly.

Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
77
senorim (17) 02-22-07  06:08pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *exclusivity
*updating
*photo size 800*600 to 1000*1200
Cons: *navigation confuse
*poor quality in general
*videographer and edition in videos
*selling everywhere
Bottom Line: Seems to me,they sales magazines and had the idea
to upload a porn site.Of course there's a lot of
(poor)photos.They have a few sections.By example=
hardcore,but it has only TWO VIDEOS!!
-Think the main problem on videos is the camera-
man:loose the focus,staggering in the interviews,
in zoom-out you can see the lamps??The girls,well-
some almost get sleep in solo session and I almost
fall down from the chair too!!.They drops the dil-
do,hits their head with the sofa.oh my!
There's a thing called EDITION.
-Expensive site,could cost 50% less.
-Under your own risk.
hit
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (4)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Drooler (146) 04-15-08  07:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)

Get It Together, Baby!

Consider this an update to my comment of Sept. '07.

The server speed has gotten snappier, but the webmastering problems are still all over the place:

-Inconsistent thumb sizes (often too small, sometimes larger, sometimes a nice large size). At least one recent gallery mixes small thumbs with actual pics! (Check your work, dammit, baby!)
-Inconsistent zips: sometimes all-in-one, sometimes each page has its own zip file.
-Incomplete labeling: In their full lists of updates by month, you can choose solo, g/g, hardcore, or all but in the listings you don't always know if they're going to be videos or photos, without doing extra clicking to find out
-Same old "1600px" photos in portrait orientation that are only 1200x790. THAT's consistent!

I even tried a 800x600 from November 2007 and y'know what? 399x600! Anyway, who the hell wants 800x600 these days? You've gotta be kidding!

They can't even keep the names straight. Clicked on the link to a "Heidi Lee" gallery and she turned into Tecey Heart.

I even came upon some ... broken links! And these were in 2007. And for a gallery (video?) in Dec. 2006 (where I'd last left off), the link took me to the updates for April 2008! (WTF?!)

When I see such things, and so many of them, the thought is "Oh, boy. Well, I guess I can't expect too much from this site." Know what I mean?

(I'm just not gushing over it like they did at Rabbit's. Know what I mean?)

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

nomad (1) 01-14-08  04:16pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Limited trial

Please note that the trial is VERY limited and only allows you to see 5 photos (out of +/-100) in each set and no videos at all. Is that worth $5? No. Similar sites offer this, and better, for free.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

bobbyboy (0) 12-27-07  03:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)

Content Not Updated and Not Very Good

I joined this site about 8 months ago and with a few exceptions they still have the same videos now as they had then. The $1.95 trial gives you very LIMITED ACCESS to the site, so you should update your review. Most of the stuff is softcore so the site just doesn't work for me.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Drooler (146) 09-04-07  04:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)

Could be better

I've been a member of this site a few times, always at the trial price. The owners need not worry about my "exploiting" it as I never got much from any single visit.

My biggest gripe is the careless webmastering. They link you to zips labeled "1600px," and they're NOT. They max at 1200 sometimes, 1600 sometimes. Or 1024! It's a game of chance. They just don't seem to care that they're not giving you what they say they are. Reminds me that the TBP reviewers don't always visit a site like a real user does; they just tell you what site tells them.

Not all of it is exclusive, BTW. I've seen some of Earl Miller's stuff on it, for instance.

However, the images have a grainy texture to them, plus there's that goofy watermark that gets pasted on top of whatever happens to be in its way -- a girl's head, a butt cheek -- it don't seem to matter to them. (I'd hate for the girl to interfere in my enjoyment of the watermark, y'know.)

The most fun is the copy they write, in the tone of mixed-up teenage girls obsessing about their boob sizes, their experiments with boys and girls, and the malicious gossip at their high schools. It's a scream!

And the archives are nicely organized, once you figure it out.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll 18 Eighteen Activity - 18 Eighteen Reviews - 18 Eighteen Comments - 18 Eighteen News

Visit 18 Eighteen

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  None Registered

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Busty Kerry Marie (0) 92.0 76.7
2. Leg Sex (1) 89.0 82.9
3. XL Girls (2) 87.0 81.6
4. Naughty Mag (2) 86.0 84.0
5. Bootylicious Mag (1) 86.0 79.5
6. Busty Kelly Kay (2) 79.0 72.8
7. Score Videos (5) 77.4 83.3
8. 18 Eighteen (4) 77.2 84.6
9. Score HD (0) N/A 87.0
10. Scoreland (0) N/A 85.5

RSS Feed : The SCORE Group Activity

View All: Company Sites (37)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.