| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.
Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.
There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.
Elvis and me, we'd be mates.
A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.
I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.
Follow-Up:
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive content.
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.
-Mostly pretty models.
-No DRM.
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality could be improved.
-Would like to see more updates.
-Content doesn't justify the cost.
-Site design is somewhat scattered.
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
18 Eighteen looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.
There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.
If you like the youngest porn possible, 18 Eighteen's content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.
Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*Exclusive girls
*Trial join
*pretty girls
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with batteries!
HUM |
| Cons: |
Hate to be negative but......
*Very Very limited video
*Formats to finding videos are crappy
*Very limited updates
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).
* There boasts about how often they update is B.S. |
| Bottom Line: |
My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.
I belong to thefemaleorgasm.com. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.
Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly.
Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*exclusivity
*updating
*photo size 800*600 to 1000*1200 |
| Cons: |
*navigation confuse
*poor quality in general
*videographer and edition in videos
*selling everywhere |
| Bottom Line: |
Seems to me,they sales magazines and had the idea
to upload a porn site.Of course there's a lot of
(poor)photos.They have a few sections.By example=
hardcore,but it has only TWO VIDEOS!!
-Think the main problem on videos is the camera-
man:loose the focus,staggering in the interviews,
in zoom-out you can see the lamps??The girls,well-
some almost get sleep in solo session and I almost
fall down from the chair too!!.They drops the dil-
do,hits their head with the sofa.oh my!
There's a thing called EDITION.
-Expensive site,could cost 50% less.
-Under your own risk.
hit |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (4) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All 18 Eighteen Activity - 18 Eighteen Reviews - 18 Eighteen Comments - 18 Eighteen News
