Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
cross eyed (Disabled)
|
I agree - Older stuff much sexier even though the video quality is lacking.
Newer content has excellent video quality, beautiful girls but lacks the heat of the older stuff.
Still a great site worth every penny.
|
02-09-07 03:10pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Davit (46)
|
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
