Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sicko Games

Sicko Games (0)

asmith12 (124) 10-18-07  02:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - unique idea of "real reality" site: models are playing games of stunts for real;
- game idea modeled after shows like Fear Factor;
- it does look as they play for real;
Cons: - when I was a member, there were exactly 5 (five) episodes, and no updates for more than a year; it doesn't seem they made any improvements since.
- way too sick for my taste;
- models are obviously playing for money only, and game atmosphere doesn't feel good;
- models are ugly (well, it's difficult to find pretty models willing to do that sick things);
- while there is sex included in each game played, but it is not related to the game and is booooooring;
- shooting quality is poor
Bottom Line: There is some story behind SickoGames. As it was reported (for example, look in Google for article "FearFactorFuck Morphs Into SickoGames After Legal Threats"), originally SickoGames had domain name FearFactorFuck.com, but they got cease and desist letter from Fear Factor lawyers and as a result indeed renamed site to SickoGames. It looks that at that point site owners actually lost all the interest in site, and stopped making new episodes. Also there were reports of them having problems finding new models (which is not surprising given the things expected from the models).

Site consists of several (there were 5 at the moment) games; each game is played by 3 girls and consists of tasks (there are also 3 guys present, but they don't compete). Each task (which is not too sick) winner gets 2 points, 2nd place - 1 point, and loser not only gets nothing, but should perform a special "wheel of shame" stunt (and that's where things start to go _really_ sick).
There are also 3 sex episodes in each game, but they are not related to the game in any way and just plain boring (not to mention poor cameraguy/lighting quality).

Bottom line: if they would make new games, I'd say that it's a site for lovers of really sick sites with motives of forcing girls doing really sick things (I'm not such a lover, but I'm not judging anybody who is :-) ). But without updates, I don't see much value in it even for such lovers (maybe to pay $25 for 5 episodes once and unsubscribe right after?)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


roseman (253) Good review, thanks for the info
10-18-07  03:35am

Reply To Message


nygiants03 (162) good review but it looks like they have well over 25 games now.
10-18-07  09:40am

Reply To Message


asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #2 - nygiants03 :

> it looks like they have well over 25 games now.
I've took a look at their current public area (home page, tour etc.) and wasn't able to see anything which I didn't see months ago; while they could make lots of new episodes without changing public areas, it doesn't look so.

On the other hand, there can be some misunderstanding regarding term 'game': when I wrote that they have only 5 games, I've meant that they have only 5 big episodes (each is 2 hours long), which represents one game played by the same 3 girls on the same day. During this episode they really play several rounds, with each of them having different 'micro-game' (like "3 Blind Skanks" or "Cunt stretching"). So we both can easily be right - they might have only 5 "big games" and 25 "micro-games".

10-18-07  11:00am

Reply To Message


nygiants03 (162) REPLY TO #3 - asmith12 :

o ok. i wasn't sure what you meant. sorry
10-18-07  12:38pm

Reply To Message


asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #4 - nygiants03 :

> i wasn't sure what you meant. sorry
No need to be sorry - thanks for noting it instead :-). I've changed wording in review a bit so it should be more clear for everybody now.

10-18-07  12:47pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.