Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Slaves In Love

Slaves In Love (0)

Active
90
asmith12 (124) 10-17-07  01:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - maledom/femsub submission and sex;
- in most cases both male and female models seem to enjoy it, so "Slaves In Love" is not just a name;
- creativity; most clips are real videos with a story behind;
- stills/video quality is quite good;
- one of masters/owner seems to be professional composer, so music in clips is outstanding.
Cons: - more than half of updates are stills-only (no video);
- less updates compared to kink.com sites (such as sexandsubmission); still ok though.
Bottom Line: One of the very few decent sites originating from Russia; video clips are in Russian but with subtitles in English. It seems that originally it was created by a composer guy (which explains role of music in some clips), but currently I'm not sure he's also with the site (would be a pity).

Usually they create very intimate and really loving atmosphere, with masters using BDSM implements not as a tool to abuse, but more as a tool to reach mutual excitement (though recently they got a new master which is a bit more into abusing his slaves; not exactly my cup of tea, but overall they're still very loving).

More than a half of updates are stills-only, but the rest are parts of pretty long stories with real (obviously, BDSM-oriented) script behind; scripts are usually extremely well-thought (and IMO create better storyline than, say, costumed porn videos by Private - and it says a lot).

Bottom line: highly recommended for lovers of Safe, Sane and Consentual BDSM niche (opposed to sites simulating rape and violence).

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Jay G (65) Good review. Tempts me to join.

I have been looking at this site for years, but was turned off by the poor main page which gives very little imformation (no update info, no quantity of product info, no models info), just random photographs. Also, there was no reply to my e-mail questions about the site (usually a very bad sign).

Is there lots of content? How often do they update? I thought there used to be a lack of videos. Is that improved now? What is the quality of the videos?

Appreciate any info.

Thanks!

05-13-08  06:43am

Reply To Message

2

asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :

I'm not a member anymore (may re-join in the future), so my comments are about 3-4 months out of date.

> but was turned off by the poor main page which gives very little
> imformation (no update info, no quantity of product info, no models
> info), just random photographs.
You're right, but inside it is MUCH better than outside :-).

> Also, there was no reply to my e-mail questions about the site (usually > a very bad sign).
Probably because they're Russians (that's for sure) and could have problems writing in English. Usually it's better to stay away from Russian sites, but this one is an exception.

> Is there lots of content?
Yes; most updates are photos (decent quality), but even my video collection (not full) is more than 100 of their clips (5-10 minutes length each).

> How often do they update?
I think twice per week (or maybe once, don't remember exactly), but updates are either photosets, or quite small parts (older about 5 min, newer 10min or so) of larger videos (some videos span up to 10 such updates, and there is usually a VERY good script behind the video).

> I thought there used to be a lack of videos. Is that improved now?
See above.

> What is the quality of the videos?
The most recent ones were VERY decent 640x480 WMVs at 800-900kBit/s.

Bottom line: if you're into this theme (on milder side, with more of psychology than physics and even less brutality), you should try it (obviously that's assuming that they didn't turn to worse during these few months I'm not a member).

PS If you decide to join, please tell me how it goes - I might re-join too :-).

05-13-08  07:33am

Reply To Message

3

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #2 - asmith12 :

Thanks so much for your wonderful & detailed reply. If I join, I'll keep you informed. Thanks again!
05-13-08  09:45am

Reply To Message

4

asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #3 - Jay G :

You're very welcome :-).
05-13-08  10:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.