My Precious Virgins (0)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||+Photos mostly at 2048px (some larger, some only 1280px)
+Many lovely models (not all); several recognizable from MetArt, FemJoy, MPL, etc. Their names on this site are Annaliese, Bianca, Cherry, Dana, Donita, Doris, Elena (Helenís Planet), Isela, Jamilla, Marbelle, Marit, Nica (Britney, nice ASS pics!), Raven, Ricci (Lena at TeenDreams), Rita N, Sophie, Vallerie S (Jasmine Gold, but only in 1280s)
+Most content from end of 8/07 is really brand new
+Visitorís page shows all of the models
||-No videos (sorry, old chap!)
-Claims on visitorís page that are NOT true: 1. 325 models (I counted 300, and 1 has two names); 2. zips for both high and low rez (thereís just one); 3. the only site with photos up to 4000 pixels (yeah sure)
-Bulk of content has been migrated from other sites of this company
-Inexplicable drastic changes in light in many photosets
-Updates show only new models; must revisit top of memberís page every 1-2 days to see when a new set is added for a model
||I think this company decided to create a photos only site. Their sites TeenStarsMagazine, TeenCharms, Real8Teens, and TeenageDepot, all of which Iíd been a member of at least once, have either gone ďvideo only,Ē or have been languishing with few if any updates for awhile. Content Iíd seen on those sites has been migrated to this one.
So the more youíve been a member of those other sites, the less chance youíll find much really new content here until late Aug. 2007, and saying that doesnít preclude future ďencoreĒ presentations. If youíve never been a member of those sites, though, thereís a LOT of fresh photo content here to enjoy.
But note these additional cons:
1. A few of the models never get completely naked
2. Some pics are very blurry
3. Thumbs sometimes donít show the entire photo (not WYSIWYG)
4. Watermark looks completely out of place (ditch it!)
5. First time logging in, must enter UN and PWD twice. Train your password manager and youíll only need to remember the first character for the first login.
6. Bloody annoying timeout that doesn't accept your login anymore (after an hour or more).
Iím actually fairly satisfied with the new content Iíve seen, but itís certainly not loaded with truly exclusive material. And the photography is not really professional, but there's enough decent stuff.
An 82 is more than fair considering the problems with this site. It's equal parts delightful and irritating.
Update: 24 models added since last review, new pics are exclusive and usually 3500px (making that watermark much smaller), image quality is better, and updates are usually every day (not always). Raising it to an 84, but, NB: about 18% of the models are less than fully nude, not just "a few" (yes, I finally did a fuller accounting). Newer models, though, nearly always change into their finest birthday suits.
Reply To Review