Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Dirty Jason

Dirty Jason (0)

qualsite34 (33) 10-08-07  02:22pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Decent start for an amateur porn producer
Girls are decent looking
Cons: Expensive - $34.95
limited selection of girls - 15 as of now
Only average quality video
Most girls do not look or act like amateurs.
Bottom Line: Here is the premise: A pudgy farm boy from Texas (think Hoss Cartright's little brother) decides to film his dates without their knowledge. He lures the girls back to his apartment and then proceeds with a lengthy seduction ending most times in sex. There are two big problems I see with this site. First, many of the girls do not look or act like dates. In fact, many are familiar faces seen on other websites, so I am assuming everything is staged. The other big problem is the price. You pay $34.95 for only 15 girls. Here is how I got snookered. I joined a much better website "Exploited College Teens" and there was fineprint at the bottom of the signup screen which asked if I wanted to join Dirty Jason for $34.95. I thought it meant $34.95 for both sites, but it was actually $34.95 extra. In any case, the site is worth a look if you can get it for $3.95 on a trial basis. Otherwise, I advise you to pass this one up until the selection increases and the price declines.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


troglodite (69) Ouch - sorry to see the snookering you got caught by. Yeah it is a rule of thumb that those checkboxes are generally "in addition to" the cost of the site you were actually trying to join. I've actually not seen any site trying to hawk anything more than a trial membership off with that option. Pretty shady if you ask me. You might consider putting a warning note on the Exploited College Teens site (if you haven't already).

That said, I'm with you on this site - very staged (there's no such thing as reality porn) and very amateurish. I'd be surprised if anyone really thought they were getting their money's worth here, but you never know. Although - he does have an Ellie Idol episode up, and that's worth a lot by itself :)

10-08-07  03:23pm

Reply To Message


qualsite34 (33) REPLY TO #1 - troglodite :

I would like to put up a warning on Exploited College Teens, but this site is not yet listed on Porn User. Too bad because I would like to post a positive review of it.
10-08-07  04:26pm

Reply To Message


Jay G (67) REPLY TO #2 - qualsite34 :

For sites not listed on porn users, try e-mailing porn users at "contact us" at the bottom of the page. Porn users has been very responsive in my experience.


10-09-07  05:59am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #2 - qualsite34 :

As mentioned, if you'll email us with the URL of the pay site in question, we'll be happy to take a look at it.

BTW, the site you've mentioned (I think) is already listed.
See: http://www.pornusers.com/review/exploitedteens/

10-09-07  06:36am

Reply To Message


qualsite34 (33) REPLY TO #4 - Khan :

This is http://www.exploitedcollegegirls.com. Exploitedteens.com is an entirely different site. However......they are both eerily similar in style and format. In fact, the only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls.
10-09-07  11:01am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #5 - qualsite34 :

Sorry, I was going by the URL you sent me in email which was the site I posted here. I'll be happy to look into the other you've (now) provided and barring any snags, the TBP Editors will get it added w/in the next few days.

Be aware, if it's a clone of the other site, it may will NOT qualify for a listing.

10-09-07  11:06am

Reply To Message


qualsite34 (33) REPLY TO #6 - Khan :

No, as mentioned it is a completed different site with different cameraman and different girls. Only the style and format is the same.
10-09-07  11:08am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #7 - qualsite34 :

I just checked and it looks like that one is also already listed.


If it helps, there's a step-by-step guide to using our SEARCH feature at:

Let me know if I can help further.

10-09-07  11:09am

Reply To Message


qualsite34 (33) REPLY TO #8 - Khan :

Thanks! I found it.
10-09-07  11:15am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.