Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Club Red Light

Club Red Light (1)

Active
75
rearadmiral (322) 01-03-14  06:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Red Light District makes some great porn
- Access to lots of their catalogue
- Supports download managers
- Good download speeds
- Most of the newer uploads have good file resolutions
Cons: - Scenes not associated with the DVD they were released on
- Scenes widely available on other pay sites
- Many ‘sites’ in the network are not updating
- Last update at all was almost a month ago
- Site may be dying or dead
- Some scenes offer no video
- File resolutions vary widely
- File resolutions not provided
- Photos offered are poor quality
Bottom Line: I find that studio sites can be a gamble. For every one like Evil Angel that does it well, there are ten that come up short. Club Red Light is lumped in with the majority of studio sites and continues the tradition of being mediocre.

Most people will know the Red Light District studio well since they have been around for more than a decade and their material is widely available on DVD sites. As a mainstream porn studio they cover all of the regular niches. Their offerings are almost exclusively gonzo and are harder-edged. This really isn’t couples porn.

The site markets itself as a network by creating different niche ‘sites.’ But since the scenes are all from RLD DVDs and are all available on the main page then it really can’t be treated as a network. (While CRL is the name of the network, it is also a separate site within the network.)

The sites, with some stats (number of scenes / last update date), are:
Club Red Light – 1099 / Dec. 7, 2013
Addicted to Boobs – 188 / Nov. 16, 2013
Ass Crazed – 148 / Nov. 8, 2013
Choke on My Load – 79 / Oct. 27, 2013
Cumfart Cocktails – 38 / Oct. 31, 2013
Cum Stained Casting Couch – 191 / Oct. 28, 2013
I Just Fucked My Best Friend’s Mom – 88 / Sept. 21, 2013
I Just Fucked Two Chicks – 45 / Nov. 9, 2013
In it Goes Out it Cums – 137 / Nov. 1, 2013
I’ve Been Sodomized – 265 / Oct. 18, 2013
Sluts Fucking Sluts – 72 / Dec. 26, 2012
So You Think You Can Squirt – 41 / Oct. 3, 2013
Teenage Fuckholes – 350 / Nov. 5, 2013
Throat Gaggers – 110 / Jan. 24, 2013
Toe Service – 28 / May 29, 2013
Young Tight Latinas – 104 / Oct. 26, 2013

One caveat when counting the scenes: I have no idea because they aren’t labelled as such, but some of the scenes only offer photos and no videos. Another caveat on updates: you’ll note that the last update on the entire site was three weeks ago. Many of the sites haven’t updated in months. I won’t be the one to call for last rites, but maybe we need a porn priest on speed dial.

I really can’t understand why a studio who produces DVDs wouldn’t structure their website around those DVDs. To make matters worse, while some of the sites have some RLD series names, and the sites have scenes from that series, there are additional scenes in there too making it harder to sort. For others like me who have a large porn collection, not identifying the DVD title means that I inevitably downloaded a lot of scenes that I already had.

Apart from not having the scenes associated with their respective DVDs, the site is laid out in a logical manner. The main site shows thumbnails for 24 scenes per page spanning all the ‘sites. Opening one of the thumbnails brings you to that scene’s page where you can stream, download the scene (if video is available) and the photos.

There seems to be a point in March, 2008 when they started offering higher resolutions. Prior to that date the scenes were offered as WMVs in 640x480 and lower. I realize that a lot of these scenes weren’t filmed in good resolution so I can’t fault the site for this, but they are pretty poor quality. When higher resolutions were offered starting in 2008 they were first WMVs at 1280x720 at 4000 kb/s. A problem though, is that even though some of the scenes uploaded after 2008 are labelled “HD” on the thumbnail, they still only come in at 640x480. With file data not provided the best gauge for guessing resolution is file size. The last two years saw another change with the file type switching to MP4. For the past two years the files are offered as an “MP4 High” and an “MP4 Medium.” The “High” are 1920x1080 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look good, but not as crisp as on some other sites. The “Medium” are 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 29fps. I know this will sound really fussy on my part, but I do wish they offered 1280x720 to bridge the gap.

While there are photos offered (and singles or zips) there are only a few low-res photos offered with each scene, and some of those are screencaps.

The site supports download managers and I had no trouble with links timing out. Download speeds were good. I experienced a problem the first few days of my membership with the site crashing and giving me an “internal server error” message. Usually going back to the site and logging in resolved it. It hasn’t happened in the past few days so it may have been a temporary glitch.

I found that I had downloaded several scenes where the video and audio were not in sync. It may have been that with bad luck I stumbled on the few like that, but it is more likely that this occurs in other scenes too.

The bottom line is that this is a site that could have been great but isn’t. RLD makes some great porn but the cons really outweigh the pros here. Add to this that the site may be dying and I am certain that I won’t be back. The only people I’d recommend the site to would be a person who is just starting to buy and collect online porn and doesn’t already have many RLD titles.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheSquirrel (53) Another excellent review. This is another one which has been on my shortlist for about two years, but I've never got around to joining. Your review at least gives me an idea of what I'm buying, so thanks for the info.
01-03-14  07:56pm

Reply To Message

2

rearadmiral (322) REPLY TO #1 - TheSquirrel :

Thanks for the comments.

Probably the biggest advantage to coming to TBP / PU for me is that it is now rare that I make a mistake and join a crappy site or feel cheated. The information here and at TBP at least lets me know what I'm getting. One thing I always look at now is the scene resolution. There are several sites I'd like to join but won't because the file resolution is too low.

01-04-14  09:34am

Reply To Message

3

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :

I'm getting that way myself. What looked great a couple of years ago now looks merely okay. Some of the modern higher resolutions look gobsmackingly sensational.
01-04-14  09:42am

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (322) REPLY TO #3 - TheSquirrel :

I agree. For a while I downloaded 1920x1080 when available but I came to the realization that for most of my viewing getting 1280x720 made more sense and takes up a lot less room. But I refuse to join sites now that only have poor resolution, which means that I won't join a lot of sites with mostly older material, and after having been a regular customer of Videobox over the past seven or eight years I won't be going back to them either. Of course, with VB, the crappy resolution is just one of many problems there now.
01-04-14  07:03pm

Reply To Message

5

TheMan (0) Great review.

I agree the site is dead. I have not seen an update in over a month.

01-21-14  11:11pm

Reply To Message

6

rearadmiral (322) REPLY TO #5 - TheMan :

That's too bad since RLD was once on of the more successful studios.
01-23-14  05:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.