Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Jay G (65)
|
As usual, I appreciate and enjoy your reviews. This one seems to be another example of how higher-priced sites generally are of far less quality than medium (or even lower) priced sites and networks.
Has your experience shown you this also? The few times I've paid for higher priced sites have ALWAYS been a disappointment. Seems webmasters that charge a higher price are relying on us when we are hungover or just being stupid, and are not really interested in large audiences for quality work. The quick buck from a few is preferred to lots of customers.
Thanks again for the heads up.
|
09-25-07 06:46am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (233)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :
Thanks Jay G
... and yeah - most of the times I try to experiment out there with "unknown" sites I get disappointed. And high price after the "you get what you pay for" never garantee quality. Mostly the opposite.
|
09-27-07 12:53am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
ramscrota (12)
|
I agree, Denner. The site's a total dog. It's good we have this forum to give some of these sites the reviews they deserve.
|
12-30-08 07:19pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|