Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naked Novices

Naked Novices (0)

Active
50
Denner (233) 09-24-07  07:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A few ok photos of not well known russians/easteuropeans.
1-2 sexy videos of russian blonds filmed outdoor.
Cons: Generally poor, poor quality of videos and poor/average quality af photos.
They don't seem to know what zip is
Outrageous/rip-off price for this content and poor quality: $34.95
A lot of non exclusive stuff.
Bottom Line: I must have been drunk or pested with hangovers when I signed up here.
Only did it because the trail-price of $ 7.95 - the price of a drink at a better bar...
And of course because I'm out there looking for new stuff from the eastern front.
But do not waste that amount either, folks - take the drink instead.
Don't know where TBP got the amount of 90+ videos - could'nt find that many. And the 40 or something I found was mostly crap. Two clips with quite sexy east-amateurs, but that's it and in lousy video-quality.
Some of the models in the photo-section are ok, but not good enough to bother to download them without zip.
With this site I think of the latest poll here at PU - these guys (US-based FatPays LLC) seems only to have one interest: To take your money.
Don't know about their other (many) sites, but for this one they live up to their name:
FAT PAY.
The site is not worth any other comments from this reviewer.....

Follow-Up:
Made this review long time ago - good to see TBP now got it too. But a score of 76?
It may have grown better since September 2007 - and the full trial for $ 7.95 is certainly an improvement - so that may be the reason.
Still: won't go back there.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Jay G (65) As usual, I appreciate and enjoy your reviews. This one seems to be another example of how higher-priced sites generally are of far less quality than medium (or even lower) priced sites and networks.

Has your experience shown you this also? The few times I've paid for higher priced sites have ALWAYS been a disappointment. Seems webmasters that charge a higher price are relying on us when we are hungover or just being stupid, and are not really interested in large audiences for quality work. The quick buck from a few is preferred to lots of customers.

Thanks again for the heads up.

09-25-07  06:46am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :

Thanks Jay G
... and yeah - most of the times I try to experiment out there with "unknown" sites I get disappointed. And high price after the "you get what you pay for" never garantee quality. Mostly the opposite.

09-27-07  12:53am

Reply To Message

3

ramscrota (12) I agree, Denner. The site's a total dog. It's good we have this forum to give some of these sites the reviews they deserve.
12-30-08  07:19pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.