Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama (1)

Active
55
marcdc1 (165) 04-22-13  03:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures)
Cons: - Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.

The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.

Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :(

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

gaypornolover (38) Shame the site isn't up to standard - I admire the lady for still being active in her sixties!
04-22-13  04:49pm

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (369) You are way more generous than I would be. I got screwed by this site but couldn't find a match on TBP so I didn't review it but it's a giant pile of poo.
04-22-13  06:33pm

Reply To Message

3

marcdc1 (165) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

You probably are right, and i've been too generous. Especially considering the few number of videos and the relative short length of them.

I think in general I am too generous with sites. I know that someone's work is important and personal to them (especially in this business) so I try to be respectful of that. Perhaps I give too much into that impulse.

I thank you for calling me out when I stray too far. You are one of the individuals I keep in mind when I'm reviewing (my friend graymane is another).

04-23-13  05:58pm

Reply To Message

4

pat362 (369) REPLY TO #3 - marcdc1 :

Don't worry about it. In my opinion. The site doesn't deserve a score above 50 but a score of 60 is not much better and you gave some good info to help people know why the site is so bad. I might have a different opinion about this site and the others associated with it if they were upfront about the quality of their content but they know that if that info gets out then no one will ever join again.
04-23-13  06:24pm

Reply To Message

5

marcdc1 (165) Those of you looking through the comments of this site you will see after my review I learned that there is in fact NOT new content still uploaded to this site.

Those of you paying extra close attention will see that I also lowered my score of this site from 60 to 55 to reflect the lack of new content and the attempt to trick their consumers.

Thank you again Pat362 for pointing out what they were doing.

04-28-13  01:38pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.