Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore (0)

pat362 (373) 03-23-13  05:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+You get to see an excellent selection of young hot looking Eastern European models have hardcore sex.
+All content is dated and they appear to upload with a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download the videos in various resolutions from 640x480 to at least 1280x720 for the videos dated from 2006 to now.
+They now also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (approximately 150).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best reolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job of tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+The ability to select the sites language out of 6 possible choices.
Cons: -The date on the content is often misleading because they use remastered scenes as new content.
-I'm also pretty sure that they use content from some of their other sites to fill this site's library.
-Some of the scenes could use better lighting and better camera work.
-The porn is rather repetitive and editing is not very good.
-The older videos are split into multiple clips.
Bottom Line: *There is very little that DDF does wrong so it's no surprise that this site is so good. Their selection of models includes many of the top Eastern European models of the last 10 years and most of them either have hardcore b/g, g/g, b/b/g or g/g/b sex or all of them.

*They do such a good job at tagging their scenes and there are so many keywords attached to them that it's easy to find all of the ones that include a specific fetish, body shape or hair color.

**The one negative thing and this is common for many Eastern European sites and it is that the scenes tend to lack imagination. Too many of the them look like paint by the number porn where there is no variation and little imagination. I also found that the editing is badly done so that there is no natural transition from one shot to the next.

**This is an excellent site but since the cost of the network is so close to this site then it's probably better to join the ddf network for a couple of dollars more and get access to so much more content.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


RustyJ (145) When you say, they use remastered content, do you mean recycled lower resolution videos from the past or are they actually scaling it up to larger files now?
03-25-13  10:24pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) REPLY TO #1 - RustyJ :

They use some of their older content that has been cleaned up and where the resolution has also been increased. It's not a bad result but you can see why it's probably not technologically possible to serioulsy alter older stuff to make it very high def. I wish I could tell you which videos have been altered but I can't. I assume that any video that has a release that after 2006 but doesn't have the true HD 1080p resolution is probably one of those videos but that is just a guess on my part.
03-26-13  04:05pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.