European Glamour Girls Review by Denner

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

European Glamour Girls (0)

Active

Denner (233)

09-17-07 08:24am

TRUST USER? YES (80), NO (0)

Status:

Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).

Pros:

For a softcore site with an EQUAL amount of photos and videos this one is among the best.
Over 500 (at this point I think almost 550) different sets of photos and videos.
Very fine/top quality of both videos and photos.
Beautiful european/easteuropean girls.
Zip for photos
720x528 prime Divx quality for videos.
Fine updates

Cons:

Hard to find any serious cons....
If any: The video-scenes might tend to be too similar for all models - but ok, thats the style here - and the style in general is certainly not bad.
A price of $19.95 would be greater, but I admid this price-in-between: $ 24.95 is a better deal than most other sites.

Bottom Line:

Had to come back here again for the third or maybe the fourth time.
European Glamour Girls is probably the best right now in it's genre: Very sexy/sweet/fine softcore with this equal attention of both photos and videos.
Im fed up with a lot of sites regarding easteuropean dolls where you get some photos and a lot fewer videos - and most videos in bad quality.
For this site the videos are just top - also fullscreen.
And maybe this is not "porn" - as I know the word. Instead this is very cute/sexy girls doing strip, posing and some/a lot of scenes with regular masturbation in the best sense.
Yeah, I like this site and that's the reason I'm back again and again.
I'm also quite taken with the well organized site og the regular updates. It seems like this is a site you can count on.
One "pros" here is also the way they do their filming: easy going from sweet posing to strip and finally the masturbation - never not just "wham, bam, thank you mam".
I seriously hope that the site-owner and photographer, Martin Krake keeps up the good work.
No wonder the site is in the Top-10 at the european index at TBP.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (12)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Drooler (218)	This is one of my favorite sites and I'd return more often if they had pics every day. In any case, I've got loads of on my hard drives. He's got some of the best stuff of Susana Spears, Laura Stevens, Marketa Belonoha, Mili Jay, etc. etc. And I was really pleased to see Ellena (Amber at EGG) start showing up there. I read somewhere that she used to be a elementary school art teacher. I can hear the young lads asking their regular teacher, "When do we have ART class again?"	09-17-07 09:49am Reply To Message
2	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #1 - Drooler : Got me there.... The teacher-things sounds exiting. But cannot find an AMBER at EGG at the "name asc." Looked for Ellena too, but nada (found an Elena, brunette at EGG, but guess it's not the same)... Please give me another hint here, m'man.....	09-17-07 09:58am Reply To Message
3	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #2 - Denner : I meant Sarah. Sorry, I don't know how I got that confused. Anyway, there's some of her at FemJoy, TopMiss, and Errotica, too. She's making the rounds.	09-17-07 10:08am Reply To Message
4	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #3 - Drooler : Agree - the new sets with Sarah are great!!!	09-17-07 10:18am Reply To Message
5	jd1961 (95)	I need help on this one please---I keep thinking of joining, but the photos on the preview page seem so bland to me. Either the girl is in a bathtub (not "glamor") or she's got her hair tied in a bun (not "glamor"). This site is called "Glamour" Girls, but I fail to see any "Glamour" in the previews. Would it be fairer to call this simply a nude site, or does it look better once inside? Thanks.	02-11-08 08:10pm Reply To Message
6	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #5 - jd1961 : Well, thats a tough one.. But yes, one thing your're right about is the problem with the word "glamour". But the girls are generally great looking - taste is hard to debate. It's fair to call this a "nude-site" - but nothing like the wellknown nude-art-sites. Most girls handle themselves in quite sexy way with an average/good amount of masturbation. I'm only into the videos - as a matter of fact I've never downloaded the photos - but as remember from the browsing the photos are also very fine quality. Hope this helps some...	02-12-08 05:21am Reply To Message
7	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #5 - jd1961 : BTW - just check out the preview - haven't been there a while. And the stuff with those bathtub-scenes are quite new, I think. Nothing for this user - whats this with the increasing amount of those scenes or showers in many sites - boring!	02-12-08 06:57am Reply To Message
8	jd1961 (95)	REPLY TO #6 - Denner : Thanks for the reply Denner!	02-12-08 10:23am Reply To Message
9	JBDICK (20)	Hi Denner another good site review. I wanted to reply to you on this one for one particular reason, (I wont reply for the sake of repying but this question is something I wanted to ask another experienced Porn Hunter). Q. Why do you think they use other names for some of the models that are not their normal names, i.e. Nicola -> Peaches, Yvonne -> Zusana, Jenny -> Marketa (might join for this one), Angelina -> Klara/Zoe, Adriana -> Zafira, Joanna -> Candy. Do you think it's because they want to suggest that these are other girls...this frustrates me because if I'm looking on a site for a favorite model it's hard work...Just interested in your thoughts. Marketa + Monika + Sabrina + (another 3 reasons to join)...	04-09-08 01:47pm Reply To Message
10	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #9 - JBDICK : Man, I do not know the answer to their name-thing - but you're certainly right. And I too find it quite irritating. But I don't think these guys here at EGG are jokers - they do a good job on this site in many other ways - and the Martin Krake-guy seems to been an ok character - they do a decent job in responding to members, too. And JBDICK, I still think this is a fine site - for soft solo models from Europe...some strip tease (I love that), some great masturbation and a few a little more soft. I've been back several times - and I'll still give it a 92 - the style in videos are great, the quality ditto, ok, it's with music/muzak background, but Martin Krakes video are more full-body than a lot of others - and if you go there - spend an ekstra $5 to co-join Erotic Destinations...even if its - only/mostly outdoor shoots Anyway - you can always save this one for "a rainy day" - but I can recommend it if you like solo soft-stuff...	04-10-08 09:34am Reply To Message
11	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #9 - JBDICK : NEW REPLY: The joining of both sites are not $5 more, but $14 more ($39), sorry...	04-11-08 03:31am Reply To Message
12	JBDICK (20)	REPLY TO #11 - Denner : thanks Denner... apologies I didn't reply to your earlier reply... I'm in two minds which is next for me... Babelicious, ATK and this one...Goddamn decisions... thanks and praise for PU and TBP... have a good weekend and thanks for the double reply...	04-11-08 10:49am Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.

Review Replies (12)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12