Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Just Nude

Just Nude (0)

Drooler (220) 09-17-07  06:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +some very lovely women (59 models total)
+231 galleries posted so far, all exclusive
+3 viewing and zip (or by-the-pic) download options for photos: “preview” (800px), “screen” (1600px), and “printable” (3000+ px)
+under each gallery image you’re given the photo dimensions and file size (a nice feature!)
+simple, straightfoward navigation
Cons: -only updates every 3 days or so
-only 4 videos. Viewed one. It sucked.
-some women are not very appealing
-design is simple … make that “dull”
-“free tour” doesn’t show much
-galleries are often short (20-30 pics) and can be boring; too many shots of the women looking away somewhere
-some shoots are broken into galleries posted at different times
-“galleries” means all of 2007; “archives” means 2006 and 2005. (?)
-earlier photo content often very poor quality (esp. early ’06 and '05)
Bottom Line: This is a very softcore nude photo site of Russian and Ukrainian women. A few of them, such as Inna (aka Inez), Kelly, Lidia (aka Kamila), Maria S, Masha, and Yana, are on other nude sites (ATKP Premium, FemJoy. JustTeenSite, MPL). They are the really appealing ones.

I agree with TBP that it has made improvements, but hopefully it can go further by
1. improving photo quality. It’s not exactly amateur, but it’s not professional either. (Doesn’t have the quality found on FemJoy or MetArt.)
2. increasing the sensuality. The girls need to “interact” with the photo viewer, not look up into a tree for bird nests or whatever.
3. getting more consistently attractive models.
4. adding more pics per gallery.
5. improving the videos. The one I viewed, of the mysterious and magnetic Masha, had so few frames per second it was like watching a VERY old movie.
6. bringing the design up to current standards.
7. completing the model bios and the photographer bios. Partly done, they look unprofessional.

All of this would surely increase membership and member interest. For the past 12 months, they’ve had an area for members to post their “comments” (just 13 so far) and for the site to respond (just 6 so far). They last one was in May. It's not exactly bustling with activity.

The updated TBP review renewed my interest in this site, but I think their praise and rating were overdone. I “might recommend” it if you like the niche and the girls and want more.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) With all due respect: Drooler joined this site as what seems to be the first here at PU - and what also seems to be the case: With an opend mind.
Even for $19.95 I had my serious reservations - especially with the promise of only 4 videos....
And that ridiculous amount does not seem to have any value at all, it looks like.
And the cons. and bottom line - the site's probably got a long way to go.

Generally Droolers review is very "professional" - and with that I mean it's very usefull to the rest of us.
I'll surely save my money on that one, for now.

09-17-07  07:53am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.