Review Replies (6)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Sam Jordan (4)
Webmaster
|
Sorry to hear that, I appreciate the site is not what everyone wants or to they tastes, but I sure at no point we place the site as hardcore or imply that. The site is listed as the following on TBP:
Category: Uniform Fetish Secondary: All Fetishes, Soft Content
this does correspond with the nature of the site which is a uniform fetish site so the focus is on uniforms where as other may focus on girls, harder natured content would be inappropriate towards the theme and “implied age group”
I keep a good eye on the site and contact with me members, a recent poll was asked if members wanted more video or not, all I will say on the matter of the site, if I am not told or asked I can not know and act.
|
09-10-07 05:24am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
bakajin (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Sam Jordan :
TBP's listing of "soft content" applies to a wide range of sites it seems, however, many of them, like 1by-day, etc have either solo masturbation videos or actual hardcore on the site. So it isn't exactly the case that "soft content" is a good indicator. TBP may want to change the way sites are listed. No, your site doesn't imply "hardcore" however it doesn't explicitly state that it's a "tease" site (for lack of better term) either.
|
09-10-07 08:04am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Sam Jordan (4)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #2 - bakajin :
Well that is something I will address, and ensure that the site sates strip tease we are just a strip tease site, and we tease more than strip again this was at our member’s requests,
I can understand the frustration of some users myself I can’t see what is Appealing viewing set upon set of a girl doing a strip cloned by other models, so I try to find new ideas
In the past I have looked at a harder content site, but I just can’t find attractive enough looking girls willing to work in the UK :(
|
09-10-07 08:12am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
turismo (55)
|
I have to ask this - but did you get the impression during the tour that there would be any nudity, or the site would be pornographic??
I ask because I joined the site on the basis that it caters for those with a clothing fetish, for me when the girls are naked I am far less interested than when they are clothed - yeah I know I'm a freak.
There is only one site that I have come across that mixes the clothing fetish with h/c action which I reviewed some time ago - you will find that pretty much every other site out there that caters to the whole clothing/uniform idea has very soft action indeed, just like spanking/bdsm sites offer virtually no sex (well the ones I have been on anyway).
I would love to see the day when a site can combine the best of both worlds, although I won't hold my breath whilst I wait!
|
09-10-07 10:55am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
bakajin (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - turismo :
For someone with a greater interest in clothed women than nude ones, you sure do join a lot of nude sites.
Tours don't always tell the full story, a lesson learned from the early days of net porn. You take your chances when you sign up, that doesn't mean you can't quarrel with what you saw.
And I don't understand you saying that "pretty much every other site has very soft action." That simply isn't true. They may not be as strict about how their models are dressed as the site in question, however there are plenty of sites that incorporate school uniforms into their content. None of them are being shut down or run off.
|
12-20-07 03:39pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
turismo (55)
|
REPLY TO #5 - bakajin :
You raised some interesting points there - my tastes do vary from one day to the next so just because I want to see a girl in a sexy outfit one day wil probably mean I want to see triple penetration the next day. But the clothing theme does run through a lot of my subscriptions, sites like only tease cater to my "less nudity is sexier" theme, and other sites like eromaxx continue the clothing theme. Even on a site like videobox the scenes I tend to download feature the girl starting off wearing something appealing - the babysitter series springs to mind.
The reason I just didn't like this site was the lack of eroticism - the girls were wearing the clothes, but weren't particularly suggestive or alluring whilst doing so - but every review has to be looked at subjectively, just because I didn't enjoy this site but enjoyed another doesn't mean that you wouldn't - I just write my opinions, and try to be factual when it comes to the amount and quality of the material
|
12-21-07 12:07am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
