Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naughty America

Naughty America (2)

rearadmiral (380) 11-05-12  05:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Even though the network promotes itself as featuring more mature and more buxom models, there is still a lot here for those of us who like younger and more petite models
- Huge network of 27 sites
- Over 5000 scenes
- Exclusive (appears to be)
- Newer uploads (2009 onward) offer a wide range of file types and resolutions
- HD available
- Many sites updating regularly
- Bills through Epoch
- Allows download managers
Cons: - Site has a lot of ads that can slow things down
- Have to enter your username and password each time
- More dead links than I’d expect on a network like this
- Older scenes are low resolution
- Some sites no longer updating
- Proportionally fewer anal scenes than similar networks (that’s obviously very subjective and isn’t factored into the score)
Bottom Line: Like a lot of PU members probably did too, I joined this network to take advantage of the great price they were offering to commemorate uploading their 5000th scene. I had never considered joining before because much of the preview material made it clear that the site was more about buxom MILFs than the 18-22 petite stars I prefer. But with a $5 fee it was worth the risk. I know that this will be the 50th review posted here so to make this of some use to PU members who share my tastes I’ll review it from the perspective of someone preferring younger and more petite models.

The network has 27 sites up and while I realize that some readers may dispute my classification of sites, the majority of sites cater to members looking for older and more buxom models. I knew that going in and I’m not critical of that. I also won’t let that impact this review or the score.

There are some sites that focus on the young and petite. These are:

• Fast Times – 148 scenes, updating with two scenes added per month
• My Sister’s Hot Friend – 481 scenes, updating with up to eight scenes added per month
Naughty Bookworms – 430 scenes, updating with up to eight scenes added per month
Naughty Athletics – 137 scenes, hasn’t updated since August 2012
• I Have a Wife – 246 scenes, updating with up to four scenes added per month
• SoCal Coeds – 40 scenes, hasn’t updated since 2007
• My Dad’s Hot Girlfriend – 162 scenes, updating with up to four scenes added per month
• My Friend’s Hot Girl – 41 scenes, updating with up to three scenes added per month
Naughty Country Girls – 22 scenes, hasn’t updated since 2009
• Naughty Rich Girls – 39 scenes, last update was January 2012

The network offers a wide variety of file types and resolutions on their newer scenes. There is really something for everyone. Mp4s are available in 1080p, 720p and 480p, WMVs are available in ‘DVD’ and ‘Normal’ and there is a Quicktime version and one for mobile devices. On all but the HD files they are also available in parts. I didn’t download all the various versions to test them, but what I did download is what it is advertised to be. The one problem with resolutions is that while they certainly offer state-of-the-art downloads now they didn’t always do that. On many older scenes the best offered is 512k which looks pretty bad. When these were being offered I’m fairly sure that they were not up to par with the best in the industry.

Streaming and photos are also available but I sampled neither so I can’t comment on those.

With the exception noted below, the network supports download managers and the links don’t appear to time-out quickly.

The site definitely has some flaws, and I realize that some of these may seem trivial but they add up to reduce the usefulness of the network. Not in any order, the flaws I found are:
• The network has no option to remember your username and password.
• If you’re on an individual site and click to open a scene, hitting your browser’s back button will kick you all the way back to page one, even if you were on page 30. Either remember where you were or use tabs. (This may not be a problem for people who don’t use IE.)
• Earlier in my membership I couldn’t use Internet Download Manager to download either of the two highest resolution files. That may be fixed now but I don’t know if it is.
• There are a lot more dead links on this network then I’ve seen with competitors.

One major flaw on the network is that it is extremely ‘busy’ with ads and feeds. Ordinarily I can overlook ads (they do work on me sometimes) because I realize it can be a decent revenue stream for exclusive networks like this but in this case they cross the line to be obtrusive. To even get into the network you have to click through two ads. Once in, the pages have a lot of ads. They’re obtrusive because they require a lot of time to download. I have a fiber op connection and on many occasions I had to wait for what seemed like a minute for the ads to load before I could navigate on the page.

I realize that this is purely subjective and many readers may not care or may see this as a plus, but for a network of this size they don’t have a lot of anal sex scenes. There were many models who are known for their anal performances who don’t do anal here. This is a subjective con, but for others it may be a plus. I’m just making the statement so that readers will know this.

So was this membership worth the heavily discounted price? Absolutely. Is it worth the usually-discounted price offered through TBP/PU? Definitely yes. Even for a guy who isn’t among the target customer group there was plenty of great porn with young and petite models to make this a worthwhile investment. I’d recommend that anyone who shares my interest in a particular type of model take the plunge regardless of the fact that the stuff we like is in the minority. There is still a lot of great stuff for us too.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (15)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


slutty (111) Excellent review RA, I agree with all of your sentiments, although for this fan of petite models it was way to heavy on the large breasted women for me (but as you say there was some material for me there).
11-05-12  08:35pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #1 - slutty :

Thanks for the comments slutty. With the $5 membership offer I didn't really take a big risk when I hoped to find some scenes that I'd like. I think with the standard discount offered here it is still a great deal. I suspect that I'll actually come back to the site again but not on the same frequency as I do with other repeat memberships.
11-06-12  08:10am

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) Truly excellent review admiral. As a site contender I never had this in the rear view mirror, but it sounds better than I was expecting. Don't forget the pre-checked cross sales as a negative though.
11-06-12  08:44am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) Another BIGGIE, RA
Good job.

11-06-12  01:21pm

Reply To Message


marcdc1 (174) Great review RA. I'm surprised you had trouble with dead links, I haven't had that problem at all.
11-06-12  05:24pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :

I agree for $5, what do you have to lose right?
11-06-12  08:41pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #6 - slutty :

Definitely. But even the $10 deal we usually get is a good deal too.
11-07-12  01:30pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #5 - marcdc1 :

It may be that you were going for a different file type or resolution. I should clarify that in no cases was the entire scene missing, just the file type and resolution that I wanted. In those cases I just took a different type or resolution.
11-07-12  01:31pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #4 - graymane :

Thank you, sir!
11-07-12  01:32pm

Reply To Message


marcdc1 (174) REPLY TO #8 - rearadmiral :

Oh, I get it.

Thanks for clearing that up. Again awesome review. (you made me see how feeble my earlier review was). Nice work :)

11-07-12  01:33pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #3 - TheSquirrel :

I never add the pre-checked cross-sells as a negative but I should. There is nothing positive about them, that's for sure. I have no problem with an offer that I actually have to accept, but I do wish that sites would realize how negatively they're perceived by active buyers. I've been burned a few times too...
11-07-12  01:34pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #10 - marcdc1 :

I don't know about 'feeble'! I had the time to put a bit more detail into mine but they all contribute. I don't know abouot you, but I try to read all the reviews before joining a site.
11-07-12  01:38pm

Reply To Message


marcdc1 (174) Problem Duplicated:

I just had the same problem you had: for me it was on Ass Masterpiece: Dana DeArmond at DVD resolution. That is really annoying.

11-07-12  02:02pm

Reply To Message


marcdc1 (174) REPLY TO #12 - rearadmiral :

Agreed. I do read reviews before joining, especially PU to get a fan perspective. I'm so thankful for this site.
11-07-12  02:03pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (380) REPLY TO #13 - marcdc1 :

Sorry to hear that... but I'm glad it wasn't something that I was doing wrong...
11-07-12  04:56pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.