Emily Addison.net Review by Cybertoad

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Emily Addison.net (1)

Active

Cybertoad (92)

11-05-12 01:46pm

TRUST USER? YES (55), NO (1)

Status:

Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).

Pros:

High Quality Video & Pictures
Fast Downloads
Very Spicy Material
Emily Addison & Models present great material.
HDV 980x553 - DV 980x737
Downloadable Zip Files
Exclusive HDV & DV Videos - No DRM
Online Slide show.

Cons:

Less then 50 videos
Updates Abruptly Stop June 2012
Small photo sets some less then 20 EA
Pricey for small site.
No response from site webmaster or site support.

Bottom Line:

Toads Overview:

This has got to be one of the fastest reviews after joining. The site took 2 days to download all material. This is also one of the most difficult reviews to do . The site stopped updating after only being up about a year. Updates seemed often and then stopped in June of this year. In all fairness to the site owners I have tried for about 2 weeks to contact them before joining and asking for PU to add it.
This is a unique bondage site that has potential of being a great site.

Concerns:
The site seemed almost abandoned it was updating often and stopped in June 2012 and no response from site owners upon several requests. I contacted the billing and they said the site was up and active but they also could not reach the site owners at my request.
The site is small and I downloaded the site in just under 2 days. Navigation is easy with only a few models on the site so that is a minus not a plus.

Toads Take:
Emily Addison is stunning and very hot, if it was not for the great material the site has I would have given it very low marks. Emily can be seen on other sites and her Bondage material is on other sites. I am a big fan of hers and when I came across this site I thought awesome.
I joined the site out of curiosity but soon realized that my 19.95 was not well spend I think until they get back on the site operations it is worth maybe 10.00 a month not the 20.00.
But that said she is amazing in the videos that are there.

The big question is should one join?
Let me say it this way.
I gave the site a 76 because the site is done well and Emily is smokin hot sexxy. I also gave it a 76 because the site has not updated in several months and there was no response from webmasters and there is limited material having only been active about a year less if you go by updates.
I am hoping to get a webmaster response and will update my review if new information presents a change in the standards of my review.
I do not feel bad for joining, I feel bad there is not more the site as it is good but average and would be great if kept up to dates.

On funny note, I noticed several grammatical errors on the site in lieu this weeks poll.

CT

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	hodayathink (18)	I do know that Emily signed some sort of exclusive contract with Twistys in June of this year. So there's a chance that that exclusive contract prevented her from updating this site, even though it bears her name specifically. Or that she abandoned this site because part of her contract is to have her own official site under the Manwin/Twistys brand. http://business.avn.com/articles/technology/Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html	11-05-12 02:40pm Reply To Message
2	Cybertoad (92)	REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink : Now that is interesting, so would this mean Twistys would opne a subsite for her ?	11-05-12 03:15pm Reply To Message
3	hodayathink (18)	REPLY TO #2 - Cybertoad : I would think so. They already technically have 2 solo girl subsites (Nicole Graves and Anette Dawn), with the Annette one looking like it's not updating at all anymore. So I would think they would/could just open up a site for her like those two.	11-05-12 03:34pm Reply To Message
4	Drooler (218)	Thanks for the review, Toad. It's just another single model site that doesn't do the girl justice, a story that's been told many times here.	11-05-12 04:56pm Reply To Message
5	Cybertoad (92)	REPLY TO #4 - Drooler : I hear ya Drool, I think it surprised me that it was open a year and stopped updating about 8 months in. I agree I have seen it a hundred times too. But this is got to be a new shorttimers record LOL	11-05-12 08:06pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.