Zlata (1)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Zlata is a young and exuberant gal
she has a very athletic and flexible body, capable of extreme contortions
amount of current galleries are about 120 with an average of 168 pictures per gallery and a resolution of 1500x1000
66 videos (.wmv) with the newer ones having a resolution of 1920x1080
archive contains about 155 galleries with resolutions around 614x819
search categories include contortion categories (backbend, frontbend, split...) and fetish types (bodypainting, bondage, nylon, latex, feet...)
three updates per week (effectively one update containing a video or picture gallery and two updates in the archive and her diary) |
| Cons: |
strictly softcore sets (nipples and crotch are taped if the clothing is too transparent)
except from some default search terms there is no tagging system or a search box
no .zips for the galleries
archive galleries are dated inconsequently which makes archiving and sorting a mess, there is no real chance to find out the actual chronological order here
you don't have access to the network sites, like absoluteskinny.com, spandexbabe.com, sweet-ballerina.com or rubber-models.com |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been around this site many times in the past few years and never got bored with their content. The variety of Zlata's posing in every setting imaginable is always exciting and the quality of their shoots had a high standard from their beginning at around 2002 until now. There are many pictures which I would love to frame and hang them on my walls if I had the space.
It's interesting to compare the older sets with a barely legal teenager Zlata and the current ones where she has grown into a sexy young woman (and kept her original flexibilty which I find pretty amazing).
Though I would say Zlata.de is a site concentrating on photography one should not neglect the videos. Watching Zlata bend in her various sexy outfits, be it in the desert, on tropical islands or even underwater is impressive.
As I mentioned in the Cons if one is an archive freak there are some shortcomings with rotated out content (no .zips) and the inconsequent naming pattern. I myself have a big deal of work now because I have many double galleries which were renamed in the meantime an I downloaded again.
My bottomline is a big recommendation for everybody to join this site if he is only remotely interested in contortion, fetish outfits and photography. Maybe it's like comparing apples and oranges here but (from my point of view) Zlata has kept the joy for experiments and fresh ideas alive which I currently miss over at MetArt.
My final score is based on the premises the site has to fulfil in its own right. It's not a general score because of the special nature of the site (if anything of that makes sense). |
Reply To Review |
