Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn (1)

bestimmt (2) 10-29-12  09:20pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Beautiful, new girls every week.

Quality, lengthy videos.

They do anal when the girl is willing.

Lots of sex - no time wasted arranging cameras, watching girls dress and undress in various outfits, etc.

Focus is where it should be - on the girl, not the male performer. Finally, a site where the prop (i.e. the male performer) keeps his mouth shut. None of that "oh, how does that feel," or "do you like it," or "am I better than your boyfriend" crap you get on other sites.

There is a ton of content. While the number of videos may have been a concern in the past, it is no longer. There are around 25 pages, each with 6 videos (and each video is about 1.5 gb in size). In other words, lots of downloading to do.
Cons: The sex is ALWAYS the same. Blowjob with him standing, her kneeling by the bed, 5 minutes. Doggy style for 5 minutes or so, missionary for 5 minutes or so, blowjob interlude, 5 minutes, cowgirl, 3 minutes, reverse cowgirl, 3 minutes, guy jerking off and facial, 5 minutes.

It is true you have to be a member for a month before you can download high quality, at that is annoying, but one good thing is that as long as you come back using the same username as before, you get credit for prior time as a member (i.e. if you were a member for 2 months before and leave, when you come back, you don't have to wait another month to download at high quality).

There is one prop (i.e. one male performer) they use who must have a red ass fetish, because he cannot keep from spanking the girl's butt until its beat red. Its distracting, NOT sexy, and quite frankly, incredibly annoying. If I wanted to see a girl's butt red, I'd go searching for some weird sunburn fetish porn. This has got to stop.
Bottom Line: This is one of the better porn sites out there in my opinion. The girls are never-before seen, they are beautiful and young, and have great bodies. The props (what I call male "performers") don't needlessly abuse them or treat them like dirt. The props keep their mouths shut. The focus is where it should be - on the beautiful girl being fucked. I've been searching for a quality porn site for a long time, and this is the closest I've come so far.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


tangub (155) An interesting review. So this site expects you to pay a minimum of $60 for 2 months continuous membership and you have to wait around for the first month before you can download HD content which most other decent sites offer as the norm these days, it doesn't sound like a very competetive business model to me.

I liked your con about "the sex is always the same"....kind of reminds me why I became bored with hardcore porn a long time ago and now just enjoy solo female content. Welcome to PU.

10-30-12  06:43am

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) Welcome to PU. Good effort for your second review.

The one thing you don't mention in the cons, is the use of condoms in 90% of their clips. That isn't necessarily a con for some, but means it's a definite no goer for me. Even if it isn't a con I think it needs mentioning.

10-30-12  07:22am

Reply To Message


bestimmt (2) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

Thanks. You are right about the $60 thing. It's a huge drawback, I guess I took off less for it because I've been a member before so it's no longer an issue, but those considering spending their hard-earned money should know going in that it costs $60 for high def downloads. That sucks. They should change it.
10-30-12  02:27pm

Reply To Message


bestimmt (2) REPLY TO #2 - TheSquirrel :

Thanks for the welcome. This seems to be a friendly community. You are right about the condoms. I find that mildly annoying , but its not a deal-breaker for me. But it is something someone considering joining should know. Good point.
10-30-12  02:32pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.