Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Brazzers

Brazzers (3)

pawn3d (0) 10-14-12  03:58pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of HQ videos with big name pornstars.
Cons: LACK OF TEENS! (You can't fool me with a bunch of 25 year olds wearing pigtails and calling them teens)
Search feature is an epic fail. Tags are misleading and/or broken.
Deceptive previews. Thumbnails are always photoshopped to make the girls look younger and the video quality better.
Bottom Line: When it comes to porn sites, I look for 3 factors: Quality, Quantity & Ease of use. Brazzers does indeed have some hot ladies and a lot of HD videos however, the problem is finding what you want:

Brazzers has a "Scene Explorer" that allows searching by site, model or tags. The first 2 work great but the tag filter is crippled. A simple tag search for "Teen" yields a mere 280 videos. Add the tag "Big Tits" and that narrows it down to 37. Out of these 37 videos, I have concluded that only 8 of them were actually "teens" and out of those teens only 4 of then had natural breasts. I'm sure there's some strays in there, but I don't pay these sites to have to search for hours to find the content I want. It should be readily available and easily accessible.

I would have given Brazzers a 10 if they called themselves "Milfs with big fake tits". However, they're trying to bullshit everyone with a bunch of smart talk about being "the world's best porn site" which they are CLEARLY not. I burned though those 4 videos in less than an hour and I'm off to the next site to find teens with natural tits, never to return.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


pat362 (375) Are you telling me that you only joined Brazzer because you thought that they would have hundreds upon hundreds of 18 or 19 years old models and that any girl above 19 is unacceptable? Unless I'm mistaken then that is what you are saying in your review. Did you check out their preview section prior to joining? I did and 11 of the 12 most updates with the teen tag doesn't even qualify since the girls are all over 19 and some of them by more than a couple of years.

If you had to join a site that mostly hires teens then why pick a site that clearly hires performers of different age groups but tends to always hire women older than 19?

I don't want to ruin your day but if you are looking for a site that only hires teens then you should quit now because it doesn't exist. You do get a decent percentage of teens girls who make the jump to porn each year but the number is never high enough that a site could hire them all and hope to survive with just them and even if they could then most of these girls don't do a lot of hardcore porn at first so that you would be stuck with some midcore to low key hardcore stuff anyway.

I have no problem with anyone awarding the score they believe a site earned but I need something more than vague opinions as to why the site got that score.

10-14-12  05:50pm

Reply To Message


graymane (33) I get your drift, pawn. Peers you really put the "high-an-mighty" bunch in the brazzer family in their place: -- (the outhouse).
I especially liked the lumps you gave the faux teen sporting pigtails.

Welcome to our cozy little place in the sun, pawn. Make yourself comfortable and Don't be a stranger.

10-14-12  06:29pm

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled) A first I was taken back at the 50, but you clearly explained your displeasure and why. Can't take issue with a person saying their beef.
I was smirking as well as you clearly had taken a notice of what they say and what they produced. I for one only a few times back in the day.
I however found the POV shots to be too much and they fumbled the camera too much just my opinion of course nice to the point opinion welcome to PU.

10-15-12  08:23am

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) Likewise welcome to PU.

I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.

Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.

Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.

I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.

10-15-12  04:41pm

Reply To Message


RustyJ (145) When I saw the score I thought "Another who feels he's been scammed" but no. This was just quite extreme opinion.
10-16-12  11:01am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.