Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Wank Pass

Wank Pass (0)

rearadmiral (368) 10-08-12  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to 44 Sites
- Interesting niche content
- Updates daily
- Site might be good for people who use streaming rather than downloads
- Photos available
Cons: - No usable search function
- No Stars named
- Meaningless file names
- Doesnít support download managers
- Many scenes appear to be clips but the others in the series arenít readily identified
- Must wait one minute between downloads
- Files only available in one format and size
- Scenes stream and play automatically
- Photos vary widely in quality
- No zips for photos
Bottom Line: There are certain porn niches that I really like; two of those are public nudity and group sex parties. This network has several sites that offer material in those niches and since those sites that have this material are relatively rare I often take a chance when I find one. But given the reviews posted here and the information at TBP I should have avoided this site. Iíll skip right to the bottom line now: with a narrow exception, do not join this site!

Iíve said many times that I think for a porn site to be great it has to have good porn, the site needs to be well laid out and finally it has to be easily accessed or downloaded by the user. A lot of sites hit two of those targets but fail on a third and donít become great sites. Theyíre stuck at merely good. It is arguable that this network offers good porn. I think they do: some of the material available is interesting and looks pretty good. But on the overall layout of the site and the ease of access by members this site falls flat.

The network is made up of 44 sites. Unlike a lot of other networks that follow a formula, this one has unique concepts for many of the sites. Most of the standard porn niches are covered, like teens , MILFs and cumshots, but rarer niches are also covered here, like feet, pubic hair, drunk girls, BBWs and femdom. What drew me in were several sites that feature a strip club motif and sites with public nudity and group sex parties.

While I like many of the unique niches available here the scenes themselves are just mediocre. In most cases the scenes are quite short. Many of the niche sites have scenes that average less than five minutes. The layout of each site is the same: there are 16 medium-sized thumbnails per page with a short, mostly useless description. Clicking on a thumbnail open that page where the scene starts streaming and playing automatically. This is a pet peeve of mine: I donít like that it hogs bandwidth and I donít like the audio surprises that come with sites like this. There is an option to download the scene too. The downloads are only available as mp4s and only in one resolution. That resolution varies from fairly low (720x480 at 1500kb/s) to fairly decent (1280x720 at 3500kb/s). I didnít download a lot of material so I canít really say how much is at the higher resolution.

I have a number of complaints about how the downloads are accessed. First, the file names are meaningless, consisting of just a number. I can live with that, but many of them include ďpart 1Ē as part of the title, obviously implying that there are other parts. I really donít like scenes broken into parts in 2012 because for the vast majority of user it simply isnít necessary, but to make matters worse, if the scenes actually are in clips the other clips in the scene arenít identified. How do I find them? The name gives no clue and there isnít even a usably search function if the names had any meaning.

The biggest flaw in downloading is something Iíve never seen before on a website. The site doesnít allow download managers (which isnít unique but still a very annoying) but the strange thing is a restriction that you have to wait one minute between downloads. This might not be such a big deal if the scenes were all 1GB files, but since many of the files are only 10MB or less that download in a few seconds, it is annoying to have to wait a full minute to download another. If you arenít willing to provide reasonable access to your members then I think you really need to rethink your business model.

One bit of good news is that the network does update regularly with at least a dozen clips being added each day.

I canít tell if the scenes are exclusive or not. Iíve not seen them anywhere else but given the wide variation in quality and the fact that they look like the same kind of clips that are available elsewhere Iím inclined to think that they arenít exclusive. But Iím certainly open to correction on this point.

The site also offers photos. I didnít spend a lot of time looking at them but I can report that the quality varies quite a bit and the site commits the serious sin of not allowing zipped downloads.

As for a recommendation, Iíd only recommend a membership to a narrow group: you like the niches they offer, and you only like streaming video. If youíre a photo guy or you prefer to download videos, my recommendation is to avoid the site. It is disappointing to see some unique porn but to have access limited to it by some bad decisions. I definitely wonít be back.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cybertoad (Disabled)

Very nice review, I wondered why in the hell a site would put a 10 minute delay time. that is just weird.
That a new on to me and I have heard about all sorts on Download limits. But this one makes little sense.
And to not allow a DL manager to boot means you can not even set a delay and must hang out to get the material. I can see why a 60 was given not a very user friendly website.

10-15-12  08:33am

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (368) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Thanks for the comments Cybertoad. The time-out is actually one minute, but your point is well taken: this is a very unusual way to restrict downloads. Like you, I've never seen it before and it is VERY annoying! I might (and I stress 'might') have been able to live with it if there weren't the other issues, particularly that a lot of the scenes are really short so you have to wait a full minute between downloads that take 30 seconds. And the video quality itself isn't great. I'm no "HD snob" but this is lower quality than I'll accept.

This is a pretty crappy site and PU members will do well to avoid it.

10-20-12  05:31am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.