Playboy Girls Review by graymane

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Playboy Girls (2)

Active

graymane (27)

10-07-12 06:46pm

TRUST USER? YES (32), NO (0)

Status:

Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).

Pros:

+Exclusive content
+ Exceptionably beautiful models
+ Over 600 models with 1000 plus galleries and over a thousand videos
+ Very few tattoos. Seemingly most or all models have natural breasts
+ purchase includes six additional sites. Models are mixed into two scrolling columns. Simply click on link
+ Videos are in three formats. The HD video selections produces extraordinary quantity -- playing at 4000k and up to 1920x1080
+ H-RES JPG 100kb photos.
+ membership includes download mgr.
+ Zips at 10 MB,
+ video=WMV HD. Downloads are lighting fast.
+ Downloads available also with VLC player.
+ Forum for those who want to use it and promotions toutes of chat with the models.
+Models are almost all white and from age 18 to 30. All appear to be simply flawless.

Cons:

+ Nagging problems initially getting into the site (password, etc.)
+ Unable to bring up photos in full screen mode
+ Because I didn’t check this site out at our Best Porn, I got myself into a choice that I couldn’t be more sorry of … that being a site primarily made up of still photo shoots.
+ Videos are short. Four minutes or less. Photo sets basically feature less than twenty pictures.
+ Although I favor softcore over the real hard stuff, this fare goes way over the top with “soft.” Eroticism is as scarce as hen-teeth.
+ Indeed, This outfit is blatantly starving for titillation, despite the abundance of glamour and exquisite bodies
+ Each folder representing a model is made up of three to five photo sets, including videos numbering around four but usually three or less, with always one consisting wholly of an interview.
+ Small watermarks on pictures
+ Updates are less than spectacular.
+ check boxes are cleverly placed everywhere to nail you into joining additional stuff.

Bottom Line:

If you opt to sink your money into this turkey, be advised to check with our Best Porn for discounts. I learned the hard way by going elsewhere for what I thought a good deal…..Ha!

Be sure to cross all your T's and dot your I's after your credit card dispenses a chunck of your hard-earned molla into their coffers, cuz obtaining credentials to jus' smoothly slide into this harum of beauties might surprise you like it did me: Like finding your excited trip unexpectedly blocking entry at the door.

As stated: This site has some drop-dead-good-looking’ gals. But don’t expect too much motion on their movin’ parts. There’s patently a grave waste looming here that screams out that playboygirls aren’t giving us what they’re capable of. You’re jus’ sittin’ there salivating, waiting for those heavenly bodies to get your motor revved up.....but don't expect it to get beyond an idle. If they’d only let loose!

Of course, if your thing is eye-poppin’ artfully done photography, then this may be your bag.

Howsomever, I can’t recommend this site; Not even a little bit. Not Even with PU’s current, tempting discount. Jus' think of it somewhat as harddrive clutter.
Of course I could be wrong. This kind of eye candy jus' might vibrate your taste buds.
But for me, I wish I'd did some homework before steppin' into this cow pie.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	slutty (109)	Nice review graymane, I totally agree with your points, I made the mistake of joining here, or one of their many offshoots some time ago and was regretting almost instantly.	10-09-12 12:17am Reply To Message
2	graymane (27)	REPLY TO #1 - slutty : Thanks, slutty, for taking the time to add your kind thought. Your words couldn't have echoed my sentiments with this site any better. They fit quite nicely associated with my review.	10-09-12 03:05am Reply To Message
3	TheSquirrel (41)	Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.	10-10-12 01:14pm Reply To Message
4	graymane (27)	REPLY TO #3 - TheSquirrel : Thanks, squirrel for those kind words. I earlier typed out a lengthy reply detailing my appreciation and some additional comments relating our combination of thoughts about the review, as well as more on this site. Unfortunately, the half-ass method by which to transfer messages via this feature seemingly wasn't working, thus evidentaly pushing everything I wrote off into a black-hole somewhere, leaving me in a position wherein I couldn't get it back. For all of PU's many sterling qualities, the difficulties of simple matters finding where to do reviews and getting messages like this moved from point A to Point B really does a number on me. But many thanks anyway. Your reply means a lot.	10-11-12 03:15pm Reply To Message
5	TheSquirrel (41)	REPLY TO #4 - graymane : Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here). I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring. I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.	10-14-12 06:18am Reply To Message
6	graymane (27)	REPLY TO #5 - TheSquirrel : Happy to hear from you again. Messages from the regulars, esp. our noteably venerable ones such as you, are always welcome .... Correction: add the suffix combination "treasures." If you don't already practice this, here's a tip to hang on to your work while composing: Just periodocally hightlight your text, hit your Ctrl+C keys and save what you've already done. So if you're wiped out, just press the Ctrl+V keys and volia.... you're back in. You can also first put it on a Word's word-processor and transfer it onto your review -- or wherever. The only problem I have with reviews is not knowing the technical stuff pertaining to the family of image and video performance ... I mean like the number of sets, quantities of pics, resolutions and the like. I just make up for it by discribing just what I see. And like you, I almost bleed over the time and effort I put into putting together a comprehensive review. PS... I suppose you're just one of a very few who read this review ... judging, that is, from the absence of replies.	10-14-12 12:04pm Reply To Message
7	TheSquirrel (41)	REPLY TO #6 - graymane : I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should. For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does. Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.	10-14-12 04:31pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.

Review Replies (7)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7