Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 1 Pass For All Sites

1 Pass For All Sites (1)

Active
81
TheSquirrel (53) 10-03-12  02:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM, pre checked cross selling, regional discrimination, or download limits.
Mostly exclusive material, with attractive girls.
Less gynaecological close ups than some other sites.
Not too many tats, or fake breasts, and not too much choking, slapping and abuse of models, that many of us here hate.
High quality spec vids and pics on newer updates, and professionally shot.
Epoch as billing agent.
$24.31 membership available through Amour Babes instead of $34.95.
Cons: Poor customer service.
Not great membership home pages, with all of them looking the same. Once again, if you want to see what's good to download, the trailer advertising pages that are open to everyone, are far better that the membership home pages.
Only a few sites on the network updating.
Obviously with the majority of sites now defunct, the quality on those sites is below what is expected of modern standard.
Annoying navigation at times.
Irritating advertising links at top of membership pages.
Little build up or stripping in photos.
Another network with very little age, ethnic, or weight, diverstiy. The models are mainly young, white, and slim.
Most of the newer updates now have mp4, but no wmv downloads.
Bottom Line: First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. Next day the sites were functioning normally

One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was told by an automated message to apply to them to reset my password. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Support For Any Site.

The next day I finally heard from them, saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed.

Even though there are 28 individual sites, they have the same appearance, with a number of the same girls appearing on different sites, only with different outfits, different settings, and different situations. To be fair, that means it isn't any different to most of the other "networks." Names like Tricky Old Teacher, 18 Virgin Sex, Creampied Sweeties, Young Anal Tryouts, Horny In Hospital etc, gives you an idea what to expect from each. The material on updating sites is well produced, with good lighting and photography, and appeals to my taste, as it is slightly less gynaecological than some of the other networks. The girls are attractive, and there are enough of them, and enough decent material, to make the membership worthwhile.

Some of the older sites look untended and uncared for. They often have a photo and name for the girl by the video download, then next to that, on the plot synopsis, have a different name for the girl. Some of the pictures are clearly out of sequence in the set. Either no one has bothered to put them into a correct order, or no one has noticed. It leaves a very bad impression of a site about to go down the plughole, and trying to pick up a few last memberships.They have dated updates, and it seems above board, with no bringing in of old stuff and passing it off for new. If they devoted just a few minutes to tidying things up, it would leave a much better impression.

The newer photos are typical of current porn thinking. Eight or ten all looking the same, then a fast forward to the next batch, without much stripping, teasing, or attempt to set out a chronological sequence of pics. Apperance of the models is young and natural, photographed in a professional way, with little airbrushing or retouching that I could see.

It may be just me being awkward as usual, but the older defunct sites like Wild Young Honeys, and Young Models Casting have better photos as far as being in a chronological and natural order, and looking more like a genuine photo set to those of us older porn consumers. Instead of 8-10 pics all looking the same then fast forward to another bunch all with the same pose, they have more of a continual flow, than most of the modern ones. Unfortunately their specs are below average for modern porn. Why the Tatyana set on Wild Young Honeys should have a yellow/orange hue, is beyond me, but it's a shame because they were only taken six years ago, not eighty.

There is wmv or flv streaming in high or low segments, which stop at the end, and do not automatically move on to the next segment. Slide shows, and full or part downloads are also available. The slide shows disconcertingly move from right to left rather that stay still.

Download speeds are on the slow side of average, but not unacceptable, with an unstated limit of six simultaneous downloads. Picture and video quality is good on the sites that are still updating. Pictures are 1200x800 on the newer updates, 1023x680 and 960x640 on the older ones. Examples of wmv video quality are Tricky Old Teacher and I Fucked Her Finally, 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps, Young Anal Tryouts 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps and 1280x720 at 5030 kbps, Young Models Casting 832x468 at about 2000kbps, down to Wild Young Honeys and Young and Banged 520x416 at about 1450 kbps. However most of the updating sites are starting to use mp4 only, instead of wmv, for their downloading and streaming, so now you have no wmv option.

Sites which are still updating - 18 Virgin Sex, Tricky Old Teacher, She Made Us Lesbians, Horny Thief Tales, I Fucked Her Finally, Spoiled Vigins, Young Anal Tryouts, Old Goes Young.

Despite all the faults I am renewing for another month. The older sites lack modern spec, but have an older porn look that appeals to me. It's a lack of gynaecological closeups, and irritating cameramen and male leads that I find refreshing. The new material is pretty good too.

This network appeals to me, but take a look at the TBP, and other PU reviews, before deciding. For me it's a nice little goldmine. They even have a "new site coming soon."

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheSquirrel (53) There was no room to lay out the sequence of events for my first 24 hours of membership. Above is an abbreviated version. Here is the long unedited one. Incidentally since that first day, I have had no trouble accessing material.

First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. I mailed Epoch who said to try a different browser. I had already tried that, however the next day the sites were functioning properly.

One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was supposed to apply to them to reset my password, but given their lack of any customer support, thought this would be impossible. I complained to Epoch, who said it wasn't their concern. I said it was their concern as they were supposed to be a reputable billing agent dealing with reputable websites. After a while with me talking about complaining to my credit card company, the Epoch person said they may refund me if I didn't hear in 24 hours from the network. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Customer Support For Any Site.

The next day I finally heard from them saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed, and that if I wanted my money back to contact Epoch and they would refund. They also sent me a new password. My reply was "Customer support on your network seems awful, but the material although for the most part not updating, seems very good. As long as the network continues to function I am satisfied enough not to ask for my money back. The network happened to go down the very first night I was a member, and there is no customer support, so that is not a good impression if the site isn't merely laying down and dying, and scraping out a few last memberships - which is what it gives the impression of doing."

10-03-12  02:39pm

Reply To Message

2

Cybertoad (104)

Amazing review, talk about giving details that was awesome.
well done.

10-03-12  04:02pm

Reply To Message

3

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #2 - Cybertoad :

Thanks toad, much appreciated! I figure this network is very much a matter of taste and opinion and depends on what you value most. Those who like lots of high spec updates wont like it, but I do.
10-03-12  04:10pm

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (194) Glad you found a network that has some content to your liking, even with the negative aspects.

Also glad you were able to get a discounted price through Amour Babes, and pointed that out for anyone else wanting to join the network.

There are some Eastern European teens at the network that are found at a lot of other porn networks/sites. But it seems like there are too many problems for the network to interest me.

Lately, I've been so spoiled by wanting my porn sites to be well designed, easy to use, with lots of good to great content.

At one time, I could search for hours through a lot of poor or just-OK material, hoping to find the good stuff. But not anymore. Now I want the good stuff on easy display. I just don't have the patience any more that I used to have.

When you write that: "First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible."

I would have been so turned off by that experience, I would have tried getting a refund.

10-03-12  06:47pm

Reply To Message

5

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :

Yes I nearly asked for my money back. It must have merely been a blip, but to have that happen first night, with what appears to be a dying network looked very bad. I am pleased I persevered with it, as there is some worthwhile material.

There are some familiar girls on this network, but as Pat pointed out elsehwere, they have different names than on other sites. I prefer newer faces and bodies though. and there are some girls I haven't seen much before.

I didn't have to search much to find material worth downloading, but for yourself and many PU members you would probably only find this material just okay because of the quality. I am willing to put up with a little less in spec quality of pics and vids for quality of material.

10-04-12  07:00am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.