Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pearl Teens

Pearl Teens (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-22-12  07:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons: -Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line: CONS(continued):

-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.


Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.

Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141

This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.

You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.

If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.

There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.

Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Primarily: fine, fine review .... second: Thanks for the warning.
09-23-12  07:59am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) Thanks for taking the bullet. I notice that it says that you get access to 10 other sites on the main page of this site. Are all other sites just as bad as this one?
09-23-12  08:28am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Most of the other sites in this network are on the same poor level:
archive sites (stopped updating years ago), small content, videos you would not want to watch because the definition is so low (I mean really grainy, blurry pictures). Primitive navigation. No search.

There is one site in the network that is worth joining:

But compared to other pay sites that are available, you are much better off spending your money elsewhere: You will find better quality content, a larger amount of content, sites that are easier to use because of site design.

It makes you realize, if you didn't before, there are good sites out there. But this network is not one of them. What I mean is, it makes you really appreciate sites like Teen Mega World, Nubiles, or the specialty sites like X-Art, Diesel network, etc. Where you can find good to great quality, large amounts of content, and sites that are so easy to use, you forget that site design is so important.

The best thing about this site (pearl teens), is that I downloaded the entire contents in less than a day, and checked every video and photoset, so that my review is based on real-time experience.

At most sites I do not check every video and photoset, because there is too much content. But this is a tiny site.

09-23-12  10:13am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Thanks for the kind words, Denner. As we know, not all of our porn dollars are spent wisely. Which is one reason why PU is so valuable.
09-23-12  10:18am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

The strange thing is that there are still many sites/netwokrs like this one where the video and pic quality is so bad that you can't understanbd why they are still in business.

I'm glad that you reviewed the site because I won't waste my money on it now but I feel bad that you had to. There are still so many sites that deserve our porn money and wasting it on a turd is never a good thing.

09-23-12  01:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.