Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Aunt Judy\'s

Aunt Judy's (1)

Newbie
87*
bigbobby44 (0) 09-20-12  03:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: looks like there are many more (and more voluminous) updates going up (daily now), and the new higher-res videos are cool too.
Cons: the site seems to be slightly underperforming in the "mom next door" type, which had been AuntJudys big strength over the years (though this seems to be getting better with each passing update). i have also seen a few sasquatch types (renee) that were pretty unappealing. there was also an african american model that seemed a bit too "ooga booga"
Bottom Line: if they can really stay true to the AuntJudy mom-next-door-type and keep up the improved update schedule, i think this will be the best mature site on the net.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RagingBuddhist (63) Any chance of you adding some details about the site? The TBP review is over 3 years old. It'd be nice to get an idea about the number of videos and pictures online and their quality. Any navigation issues?
09-20-12  05:01pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) I like what you say under your cons when you talk about the new AJ not featuring the "mom next door" type enough, except I can't see how it is improving from update to update.

I had great hopes for this site because AJs had been steadily going downhill during the past few years with picture sets that were technically okay but generally bland, a far cry from the olden days.

The "Older Women" videos section also was a farce with videos that were no better than 640x480p being listed as HD and generally of horrible quality. This is the bulk of the material one will be subscribing to if one subscribes to the new ATK Aunt Judys and I must say that for great sets, albeit in yesterday's format, there's a gold mine if you go back five - six years.

Now back to the new AJs: I truly can't see an improvement, except for the technical part. Picture sets are high resolution, videos are now of excellent quality technically but the AJ updates are only trickling in, compared to other ATK sites and have to be augmented by bonus sets from ATK's Mature and Hairy section, a subsection of Natural and Hairy. People who subscribe to both are complaining about the duplication.

But galls me the most is the unevenness of the updates. I am tired of foot fetish updates, way out of proportion, I am tired, as you pointed out, of the attempt to import the most extreme hairy contents from N&H (extremely hairy legs) and have yet to see one set that really makes me go wow, in AJ & N&H (mature and hairy) combined.

I have lowered my expectations to such an extent that I give good marks to very mediocre sets simply because the model chose to wear one or two items of underwear. Therefore I would say that in my opinion your rating for this site is too high.

But as I have stated before ATK usually offer a quality product and I am confident that down the road the site will deserve a high mark.

09-20-12  08:07pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.