Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sasha Blonde

Sasha Blonde (1)

Active
79
lk2fireone (194) 08-21-12  02:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality.
-Credit card processor: CCBILL.
-Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl
posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching.
-If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately.
-Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can stream or download videos.
-The content (videos and photosets) are dated.
Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value.
-Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot.
-No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling.
Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates.

SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites.

If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and
SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha.

Number of videos: 431+
Number of photosets: 528+

Most videos have several download options:
WMV 1080p
MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p

Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes.
Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set.

Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size.

Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px.

You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself.

I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
A good review and, IMHO, deadly accurate too. I am a current member of the Diesel Network and consequently also of Sasha Blonde.

I get the same sense of not much personality from the collection of photo sets and videos of all their girls, with a possible exception of Gloria.

Sasha, poor girl, seems not to have been done justice on any of the sites in which she appears. MET art most captures her beauty but in a distant and impersonal manner. And Sasha Blonde is even more disappointing. It is a pity because I think she is such a beautiful and interesting model.

08-21-12  10:04am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) Very fine, informative review....!!
One I as easy could take as a warning as a recommendation (not looking at the score)
Sasha Blond certainly has something and much of her material can be seen elsewhere, but as Lk2 mention - the site itself (been there) is primarily Sasha....and in my humble view: her vids could be much better edited/produced/directed or whatever.
Her solo vids are ok, her hc/bj vids are quite a problem...in my words: strange - and not very erotic (a mess) - seen two or three of those last which was pretty god - the rest not.
Difficult site - but well reviewed here, thanks!

08-21-12  02:02pm

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Thanks for the compliment.

Sasha is a very cute girl. But her vids, and photosets, at this site are not very erotic. Sometimes you don't realize how much the photographer contributes when you look at a photo of a pretty girl, and think, "I could have shot that myself."

08-21-12  03:36pm

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - Claypaws :

I started looking at nude magazines in the 1960s and 1970s, first with Playboy, then with Penthouse. Obviously the pictures were paramount. But the accompanying personal stories made the models more real and meaningful, even if the "facts" were sometimes doctored.
08-21-12  03:53pm

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - Claypaws :

What I'm try to say is that with a short pictorial, 10 to 20 photos or less, but with accompanying personal story, the photos, and the model herself, gained meaning.

Today's photoshoots have far more photos per set, but the story is lacking, and the photos have less impact.

Other factors enter in as well. With 10 to 20 photos in a pictorial, the editing/choosing of the actual photos was more important. And I remember savoring each fine photograph like a fine dish.

Today, I go through a single photoshoot like I'm slurping down garbage, hoping that a few photos will stand out and give me pleasure.

The models today are just as physically lovely, if not more so, than the models of 50 years ago. And there are certainly more of them.

But I'm glad that some sites, like X-art and Diesel, are trying to put an erotic or sensual or quality element back into porn.

08-21-12  04:37pm

Reply To Message

6

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

Ah, I see where you are coming from now. We have a different approach to photos and stories. I am enough of a cynic to consider all the personal stories and bios to be pure fiction. For me, the personality comes through in a set of well lit, focused images in which the model engages with the camera. Sasha has hardly any of those on any site at all.
08-22-12  05:10pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.