Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Wife Writing

Wife Writing (0)

Active
82
rearadmiral (326) 08-06-12  10:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Interesting and under-served niche
- Part of the Dog Fart Network
- Many options to view / download scenes
- Photos available
- Streaming video available
- Still updating – but slowly with usually just one scene per month
- Many popular porn stars
- Supports download managers (I use Internet Download Manager)
Cons: - Small site
- Scenes are mostly just oral
- Could play the BDSM role more
Bottom Line: This review might be best served if I define the niche first. The focus on the site is that in the course of the scene the male uses a marker to write on the female’s nude body. I’m guessing that the ‘wife’ part of the title is only for alliteration.

I joined Dog Fart Network specifically to get access to this site. This is a very small niche and my interest in it stems mostly from its use as part of BDSM. While the site is interesting and reasonably well done, I was a bit disappointed with the theme since the ‘writing’ is done to highlight the fact that the scenes are interracial rather than specifically as part of BDSM. (So instead of having “Whore” written on her forehead the model might have “Black Cock Lover” instead. I’m probably really splitting hairs here but for anyone into this niche it can make a difference. Still, I’ll take what I can get.)

Two things that any future member may want to know: the male talent is all black. That shouldn’t make a difference, but some may prefer to see a Caucasian male once in a while. The other thing is that actual intercourse is rare; most of the scenes are only oral. I didn’t see any anal in the few scenes where intercourse occurs. The female talent ranges from relative unknowns to popular porn stars.

The site is quite small with only 43 scenes available. It is one of the DFN sites that is still updating though, but the updates are fairly slow only coming in approximately once a month.

The site layout is simple: you open onto a page where six scenes are listed. Each scene has a large screen-cap of the model. One thing I particularly like is that the video and photo options are available right below the model’s name and screen-cap. There’s no need to open a second page just to access the scene. I also like that there is a brief description of the scene too which can provide more information for you to consider before downloading.

Speaking of video download options, the site offers two: WMV and MP4. WMV files are usually offered in two sizes. Interestingly, both sizes come in at 640x480 but the difference in that the larger ones are 4500kb/s while the smaller ones are 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. MP4s are usually offered in three sizes. I use WMV so I don’t have the specs on the MP4s. Some of the older videos (but not all) come in at 640x360.

This seems odd in 2012, but the WMV files are also offered in segments for both the lower and higher resolutions. I can’t imagine there are many people out there who would prefer segments when the full video is available too.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links dying on me.

I didn’t view the site on a mobile device but there is a separate link for those users where various viewing and downloading options are also available. Surely no member could complain about a lack of viewing options here.

Streaming is also available, but I don’t use that so I can’t really comment on it. The scenes I tested looked okay on a monitor. The resolution of the two available streams seems to be close to the WMV downloads. The streams open in a new page and play on the site’s player.

While the site is really a video site they do offer photos. In keeping with the various options for videos there are options for the photos too. There are separate photos taken of the model during the scene. These are available as singles or zips. The resolution is pretty good at 1067x1600. There are also lower resolution screen-caps available. Then there are “panels” which is a photo made up of four screen-caps fitted per page. Neither the screen-caps nor the panels are available as zips.

As BDSM goes, this site is fairly weak. I think they could improve by playing the Dom/sub roles a bit more. Still, sites that cater to this niche are rare. This is the only one I know of, so if another PU member has some recommendations I’d appreciate getting them.

Even though the site is small and the videos aren’t exactly what I was hoping for, I’d definitely recommend the site for anyone with an interest in this niche. And I’m not just saying that because there is nothing else out there. This site could stand alone and still be a good value at the right price. Admittedly though, unless you’re into this obscure niche like I am the real value of the site is the access to the rest of the Dog Fart Network.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (10)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

marcdc1 (165) Great review thanks. I've looked at this site a couple of time and was hoping that it was more a bdsm/humiliation site. Glad to hear I haven't looked into it more. Based on your review I don't think I would have been happy.

Do you recommend an sites that better fit into the writing BDSM genre?

Thanks again for a kick ass review

08-06-12  12:56pm

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (367) I took a look at the site and you aren't likely to see too many new scenes added because these are all past porn performer who retired 2 or more years ago. Dogfart isn't the most honest when it comes to the date on most of their sites. There are only about 5 of the sites that are updating with actual new content. The others are mostly updating with remastered stuff. This is probably the case with this site if the videos are in one file and of decent resolution. It's usually easy to identify the older stuff thayt Dogfart has because it will often be broken into many pieces and resolution will be poor.

It's still a great review but I don't thinki anyone should pay the join price if they are expecting more from this site.

08-06-12  01:32pm

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (326) REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :

Now that you mention it I do recall reading that the site will re-issue videos and give them new dates so that might be happening here. I did think it odd that some of the models who's scenes are dated from 2010 were some who really hadn't been in the business for a while.

This site alone definitely isn't worth the price but the entire network is pretty good.

And pat, with your encyclopedic knowledge of porn, are you aware of any other sites with this theme?

08-06-12  04:31pm

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (326) REPLY TO #1 - marcdc1 :

Thanks for the comments. I do like the site, but I just wish it had a more sinister feel to it.

I don't know of any other sites that do this, but Jim Powers has some of it in his movies but that's hit-and-miss and a lot of his titles aren't available on the internet except through the JM Productions site which is pretty crappy. Max Hardcore did a bit of it too. I've asked resident porn expert pat362 for some advice. He may know of other sites.

08-06-12  04:35pm

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :

The only Dogfart site who's content I check every week is Blacks on Blondes. The network is way to expensive for me to join more than once or twice per year with only this site. It's not the only site with new content but all the others more or less deal with oral sex and blow bangs and these aren't my cup of tea.

The one great thing is that they started to remaster the Katie Summer and Spring Summer content and that was great news because I love those two sites. I even checked with the guys who produce their content to see if they will ever make a similar site and they said no because the industry is no longer the same.

I'm not aware of another similar site as wife writing but that's not unusual since most oftheir sites are truly exclsuif to anything else on the net. Did any of the Meatholes sites have something a litle like this? Be advised that even if they did then it will also be old content since those sites are dead.

08-06-12  05:45pm

Reply To Message

6

rearadmiral (326) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

Thanks pat. I alos liked Blacks on Blondes. That's probably the best site on the network. They've remastered a lot of the older scenes with some of the models I really like and they have a fair bit of anal too.

I was thinking of a Meatholes membership since it's been years since I had one but I recall a PU member saying he had serious credit card issues with them. That's what I recall reading but that may be incorrect.

08-06-12  05:51pm

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral :

BOB has a lot of anal. More so in their older stuff but you still get plenty of top performers shooting for them and these are even willing to do IR anal which is a lot more rare.

I will never join Meatholes because only a very small part of their content appeals to me. I'm not aware of any issue with Meatholes per say but the info on that particular network is 2 years old or more.

08-06-12  05:58pm

Reply To Message

8

marcdc1 (165) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :

Thanks for getting back to me and thanks to pat362. I feel a little guilty pulling him into this query. He has already been very generous with his knowledge on my behalf. Thank you again gentlemen.
08-06-12  07:43pm

Reply To Message

9

rearadmiral (326) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :

I'm indifferent to interracial simply because I see the male talent as part of the furniture so I would neither seek out nor avoid interracial stuff merely because it happens to be interracial. But DFN, mostly on the strength of Blacks on Blondes (and several other sites too, as you mention) is a pretty good network. I'm amazed at what some petite models can take.

As for Meatholes, please disregard my comment about possible credit card issues. There's no mention of it here on the site's page so it has to be another site. Sorry for any confusion.

08-07-12  04:09pm

Reply To Message

10

rearadmiral (326) REPLY TO #8 - marcdc1 :

If either of us should feel guilty it should be me - and trust me, I'm as interested in the answer as you are!
08-07-12  04:10pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.