Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie (0)

messmer (137) 07-22-12  11:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)

Still frustrated one year later!

And it is still in connection with the same complaint: too much air brushing, too much photo shopping until the model looks incredibly beautiful but totally plastic. Others must feel the same way because in a recent poll 58% of the subscribers would prefer if they did away with photo shop and presented their models "as is!" Hope they will listen and make the necessary changes soon because this could be a very good lingerie site.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (151) Well i'm a current member and also one of those 58% who voted in the poll. Really don't know why they feel the need to use so much airbrushing when all the models are already stunningly beautiful.They totally trashed my favorite freckled redhead Faye Regan with the airbrushing to the extent you wouldn't even know she had freckles if you'd not seen her before.
07-22-12  01:56pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

This is hilarious in a way, tangub, because my previous complaint was based on the fact that one of my favorite models, Faye Reagan, was air brushed to such an extent that I couldn't get myself to download her sets! She looked stunning, flawless ... but wasn't the Faye Reagan I was used to and collected! It is really too bad that all the "Only Tease ... only Satin" etc. sites are the same way. Gorgeous models in gorgeous lingerie but all of it air brushed way too much!
07-22-12  04:34pm

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (218) I find it even more frustrating when they put the whole photo set into some kind of filtering and come up with stuff like Celeste Star on July 11th or Rebecca Blue on June 27th, just to name two. They really ruined those!

Guess they're trying to be artists. We, on the other hand, are not interested in fucking paintings. Clearly, there's a disconnect here.

07-22-12  07:32pm

Reply To Message

4

Only Tease (6)
Webmaster
We have taken on board our users input, we have made the decision that future sets produced in-house will no longer be re-touched, please understand that there are sets already uploaded to the site that have yet to be released that have had post-production and we're not in a position to re-work those sets (some we can't anyway)
07-24-12  12:32am

Reply To Message

5

messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - Only Tease :

Thank you, that is really good to know. Would there be any way of letting the 59% of us know when the new un-retouched sets start showing up? I got so frustrated with the latest sets yesterday that I actually deleted my bookmark to your site as well as my password and username, even though I had more than a week to go until expiry! I simply couldn't stand the daily disappointment, especially since your models are so beautiful (along with their lingerie.)

Believe me when I say that there is nothing but good will toward your sites on my part and that I am looking forward to the time when the photos become more natural right across the board. BTW, what about the sets produced by other sources? Have they been instructed to keep the re-touching down as well?

Thanks a lot for responding to my comment!

07-24-12  09:45am

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :

Sorry, Drooler, I didn't mean to ignore you. I had simply forgotten all about your comment. I am happy that the webmaster seems to care and that we might see unretouched picture sets down the road yet. Most sets WERE ruined for me, to the point where I decided yesterday not to bother to return to the site even though I had more than a week to go in my subscription.
07-24-12  09:51am

Reply To Message

7

Only Tease (6)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

Hi Messmer,

We might look at adding a search "keyword" to these new sets to indicate no re-touching.

At this stage all future production will most likely be kept in-house with our staff photographers, but if any future content is purchased from other sources then it will have to comply with the same production standards as our in-house production - so no re-touching.

08-07-12  03:56pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.