Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Suicide Girls

Suicide Girls (0)

HeatherMcXxx (10) 07-15-12  06:45pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Lots of picture sets
-- An engaged community of models and members who participate in an abundance of groups both sexual and non-sexual
-- A well-organized home page allowing for easy navigation
-- Models representing lots of shapes and sizes, all of whom reflect different notions of beauty
Cons: -- Quality of pic sets varies markedly
-- Some models won't be to your liking, more so than on other sites where you find a more consistent level of beauty
-- Videos are brief and eclectic, not typically erotic (and, usually, superfluous)
-- Pic sets can't be downloaded
Bottom Line: Welcome to the post-Rigel era at Suicide Girls. Rigel was a popular model (and administrator) on the site until 2010, when conflicts at the company -- as well as a desire to return to school -- hastened her departure. She represented the ideal SG: gorgeous, shapely, inventive, and, of course, irresistible thanks to her stunning tattoos. A new Rigel set was an event -- you knew you'd get high-quality, erotic photos shaped around a creative concept. She was the best.

Her exit came after the site began expanding its model roster, and, given the influx of new talent, the quality of the photo sets diminished, and the models themselves became less compelling. Fewer and fewer captivate me now, and it's difficult to keep up with the ever-changing and expanding roster. (Only a handful of true stars, like Annalee, remain.) Many of the sets will leave you flat; others will have you scratching your head. Occasionally, you'll find a model and set that capture you. Quality control seems lacking, though part of the aim of the site, no doubt, is to be more democratic in who they feature. It is what is -- no more.

One of the advantages of SG is the active (and large) community, comprised of both models and members, who post to the site's board and who participate in an abundance of groups that cover sexuality, religion, philosophy, the arts, and pop culture. Many of the groups have active discussions. I suspect some members, like me, continue to buy a subscription merely to keep abreast of group goings-on.

On the topic of subscription rate, it's not expensive. You pay $49/year, and if you let your membership lapse, eventually you'll get an offer to renew at $29/year. So it's not a prohibitive investment, and, frankly, it's not worth any more than that, unless your fetish happens to involve tattooed and pierced women.

I've become bored with the photo sets -- they rarely have the charm that Rigel's sets (and those of other classic models) exhibited. But once in a while you're treated to a gem, and the community is always there to engage with. In addition to the pics and videos, you'll find blogs (by both models and members), interviews with well-known figures in the arts community, and a chat feature.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


otoh (54) Heather, thanks for this review - SG is a site I've toyed with joining, being vaguely into this sort of thing (the second SG book is sitting on my shelf of racy material) - so it's good to know that it's possibly not worth it.

Have you joined God Girls, which is similar? I'm also tempted by Zivity, which is a similar community-type site, but seemingly a broader range of erotic photos rather than specifically alt girls.

07-15-12  11:54pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) This site was suggested to me as a possible join a couple of years back.
When I looked into it, it struck me as a sprawling site lacking focus and direction.
I did not join.
From your review you say things have deteriorated since that time.
That is a shame, because it did have potential, I thought.

Cap'n. :0/

07-16-12  10:57am

Reply To Message


HeatherMcXxx (10) REPLY TO #1 - otoh :

Hi otoh - I've taken a look at GodsGirls, and I joined Zivity for a month. Neither captured me, though I probably didn't put enough effort into appreciating either.

Honestly, if the SG look is your cup of java, it's probably worth the $48/year -- that's just $4/month, the cost of a latte at most places now. :)

Thanks for the reply. :)


07-16-12  11:53am

Reply To Message


HeatherMcXxx (10) REPLY TO #2 - Capn :

Ahoy, Capn - I'm not sure I'd say the site lacks focus or direction -- it seems mostly on topic, though you're correct that it's sprawling (and not all areas are active). Still, once you find those elements you enjoy, you can ignore the rest. SG has plenty of members, which suggests it's doing something right.

I appreciate your reply. :)


07-16-12  11:59am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #4 - HeatherMcXxx :

I just got the impression it was more of a social media site with some photographs, rather than a photography based pornography site.

Cap'n. :0)

07-16-12  01:02pm

Reply To Message


HeatherMcXxx (10) REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

Well, it's softcore for sure, but the foundation is the photos and models (with a pronounced social focus), I'd say.
07-16-12  03:53pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #6 - HeatherMcXxx :

I think that is a fair synopsis.
Cap'n. ;0)

07-16-12  04:10pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) Great review. Have you ever looked at the stuff burning Angel puts out? I'm not sure if their content is what you are looking for but they seem to cater to people who are into models that are into body modification.
07-16-12  06:25pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.