Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18 (0)

Active
82
exotics4me (463) 07-11-12  06:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons: - I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line: I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.

I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...

For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.

The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.

I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.

The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.

There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.

I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.

Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.

I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

hodayathink (18) This review seems pretty much in line with how I feel about this site from the previews I've seen. I believe that the person that runs this site also runs another site where the girls are the masseuses and the guy is the client, but it's on an entirely separate membership from this one.
07-13-12  07:33pm

Reply To Message

2

Gasperdian (6) Thanks for a great review, exotics4me, my views exactly & my exact thoughts on the last 3-4 lines of the 2nd paragraph of your review! This site with Jake & his models is quite cool, funny & lovable. But you hit the nail on the head when you said formulaic,stereotypical & boorish. My thoughts exactly & it doesn't seem like the site administrators want to make any friends either because whenever I'd been a member, I used to be the only ones referring to my old emails for story suggestions…so much for that!

But I don't agree with what you said that the models here are slim & slender! Models like Misty, Cindy Hope, Tia Cyrus, Melanie Jane & Isis Love defy that trend. But I would say that Isis Love falls into the Bootylicious category instead. Yes, a few things are that hardly any Asian models feature,almost all models are diminutive [as compared to Jake} & few make handy conversationalists which isn't what young women are like these days. They love to talk & converse. I must say one thing about the site videos, they have become too concise & brief just like Jet, Set, Go which is an eyesore

09-08-12  05:53am

Reply To Message

3

Gasperdian (6) REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink :

You got that right, the site is MassageGirls18.com where the girls act out as masseuses & give Jake a massage & much more. Shameful that this couldn't be bundled as a bonus site
09-08-12  05:55am

Reply To Message

4

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #2 - Gasperdian :

Sorry about the delay on the reply. I've found that my views of body types are a good bit different than a lot of porn fans. I'm a huge fan of Cindy and Tia, but always considered them slim. And you threw me off on the Isis Love one. It's an easy to make mistake since it's Isis Taylor, a little lesser known model than Isis Love. And I do agree though, the Isis Taylor scene is my favorite on the site. I think the webmaster of the site tries too hard to stick to that 18 at the end of the site name, which is why so many of the models are of slimmer build. I could see models like Isis Love, Jenaveve Jolie, Sativa Rose having excellent scenes on a site with this niche, but they are all around 30 years old.
10-08-12  02:41pm

Reply To Message

5

Gasperdian (6) REPLY TO #4 - exotics4me :

Right you are "Exotics4me"! Even Jayden James,Kortney Kane,Cindy White are not exactly 18 or teens in any manner of speaking yet these kinds of models proliferate in this site. A shocker was Rebecca Linares being shown as 18 which is a far cry away. Just wish FH18 would be more accommodating and include the initiation or first time casting of these starlets as their episodes but that's not their focus anymore.It would have been so hot to see newbies doing their first porn scene or sharing their experience but hell no, they just won't have it. I believe this is a standalone site because they can't afford to give multiple access as those might be much better
10-09-12  06:46am

Reply To Message

6

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #5 - Gasperdian :

I had meant to get back to this since you mentioned standalone site. Did you ever get the bonus sites with Fucked Hard 18? When I was a member, there was a link to bonus sites, but all that was on it were a bunch of links with no descriptions of what I was downloading.

If nothing else, I think Fucked Hard 18 could alter their shooting style some. Maybe make the talk/stripping a little longer and add some kind of storyline/dialogue. I just think overall they are too sterile with the scenes. I have this image of someone holding up a placard that says, "2 more minutes of doggystyle!"

11-19-12  03:05pm

Reply To Message

7

Gasperdian (6) REPLY TO #6 - exotics4me :

Happy Thanksgiving Day "exotics4me"…you make a moot point! There are a couple of non-updating porn sites which FH18 gave limited access (streaming only) but all this is a gas & goes up in smoke. You would need a very steady datalink line to access the footage & unfortunately the bonus sites are really crappy & obsolete by modern day standards!

FH18 has always respected its women customers, believe me. The shooting is very artistic unlike several other sites which have long pussy focus from both front & rear which has too many close ups & you end up really tearing your hair from its roots! Here, the girls are excellent, nubile but some are sex capers, damsels who know an awful lot about getting it on under the sheets!

A major flaw is the sex scenes are so contrived, mechanical, crude & most rudimentary. Yes,like you said, most of the bunnies should hold up placards saying to Jake [masseur], what would like to do to me Creampie or Facial!! I'd made several unsuccessful attempts as a former member to add some spice,sensuality & color to the overall quality of scenes but hey, the webmaster throw the book in your face!

There should be some different positions, climaxes, foreplay but its very labored & self effacing

11-22-12  09:04am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.