Fetish Network (1)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
||The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
||This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"
Reply To Review